Senate "Motion To Dismiss" Impeachment....

[bigrebnc1775]

Foolish loser democrats

LOL! So you resort to silly name calling after Skylar soundly spanked you. Too funny.

Actually the one that was spanked was the moron skytard

 

[Erinwltr]

Foolish loser democrats

LOL! So you resort to silly name calling after Skylar soundly spanked you. Too funny.

Actually the one that was spanked was the moron skytard

LOL! Um no. And you resort to the same silly name calling.

 

[debbiedowner]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

They can't show you the desperation of the so called republican snowflakes is pathetic.

 

[Paulie]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.

Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...

There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written.. It requires consent of the HOR.


pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?


Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.


DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?

Yes or No

Should the House impeach Trump, what will likely happen is the Republican Senate will refuse to conduct a trial – again, further proof of the right’s contempt for the Constitution, our democratic institutions, and the will of the people.

Can John Roberts throw the trial out like a normal judge can do with a regular trial?

 

[Lesh]

Would be interesting.

The thing that gets me is the denial of equal access to mount a defense of the president by Democrats. Any prosecutor who does this in any other court in the land is charged with proescutorial misconduct. The denial of access to all information, the denial of access to witnesses and the ability to depose and subpoena records, etc... Pelosie and her chiefs are denying it all to republicans. The democrats know if they hold a vote to authorize the process Republicans get access to everything and get subpoena powers outside of the Democrat control.

Its all being denied by democrats today and its going to end badly for them..

The President can defend himself in the Senate trial stupid

The House is essentially acting as a Grand Jury.


Ask your legal eagle “friends” if they know what a Grand Jury is

 

[Billy_Bob]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.

Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...

There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written..


pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?


Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.


DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?

Yes or No

Can you show us anywhere in the constitution where it says the full house must vote on an impeachment inquiry?

Yes or no?

It doesn't have to say "The full House". It says "The House". It doesn't say "the Speaker and a highly partisan committee chairman". "The House" means "The House", ALL OF IT. I have no doubt the left will continue to ignore the Constitution anyway but if they think the American people won't object to their tactics, they're making a mistake and will pay dearly for it in 2020.

The poster is an idiot. They have no clue what the Constitution means. They can not discern a single person from the body of members..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Would be interesting.

The thing that gets me is the denial of equal access to mount a defense of the president by Democrats. Any prosecutor who does this in any other court in the land is charged with proescutorial misconduct. The denial of access to all information, the denial of access to witnesses and the ability to depose and subpoena records, etc... Pelosie and her chiefs are denying it all to republicans. The democrats know if they hold a vote to authorize the process Republicans get access to everything and get subpoena powers outside of the Democrat control.

Its all being denied by democrats today and its going to end badly for them..

The President can defend himself in the Senate trial stupid

The House is essentially acting as a Grand Jury.


Ask your legal eagle “friends” if they know what a Grand Jury is

Well Moron, that is not how impeachment works. Those who oppose the majority get to have the same powers as the majority to mount a defense in the House Of Representatives as it is a DELIBERATIVE BODY that requires information from both sides of the issue. IT IS NOT A GRAND JURY where the accused has no representation.

 

[Billy_Bob]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.

Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...

There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written.. It requires consent of the HOR.


pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?


Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.


DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?

Yes or No

Should the House impeach Trump, what will likely happen is the Republican Senate will refuse to conduct a trial – again, further proof of the right’s contempt for the Constitution, our democratic institutions, and the will of the people.

Can John Roberts throw the trial out like a normal judge can do with a regular trial?

Yes he can...

But he will not. He will call a vote to dismiss it with prejudice allowing the Senate the final say under the constitutional mandate. The Impeachment will become null and void. The house democrats will be exposed for the imbecilic fools they are.

 

[Lesh]

Would be interesting.

The thing that gets me is the denial of equal access to mount a defense of the president by Democrats. Any prosecutor who does this in any other court in the land is charged with proescutorial misconduct. The denial of access to all information, the denial of access to witnesses and the ability to depose and subpoena records, etc... Pelosie and her chiefs are denying it all to republicans. The democrats know if they hold a vote to authorize the process Republicans get access to everything and get subpoena powers outside of the Democrat control.

Its all being denied by democrats today and its going to end badly for them..

The President can defend himself in the Senate trial stupid

The House is essentially acting as a Grand Jury.


Ask your legal eagle “friends” if they know what a Grand Jury is

Well Moron, that is not how impeachment works. Those who oppose the majority get to have the same powers as the majority to mount a defense in the House Of Representatives as it is a DELIBERATIVE BODY that requires information from both sides of the issue. IT IS NOT A GRAND JURY where the accused has no representation.

The minority gets a VOTE...as does the majority. All members do.

That is ALL the Constitution says on the matter.

Go back to "law school" with your barbershop buddies

 

[Lesh]

But he will not. He will call a vote to dismiss it with prejudice allowing the Senate the final say under the constitutional mandate. The Impeachment will become null and void. The house democrats will be exposed for the imbecilic fools they are.

Nope.

McConnell: If the House impeaches, the Senate has "no choice" but to take it up

Back to school for you. FAIL

 

[Billy_Bob]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.

Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...

There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written..


pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?


Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.


DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?

Yes or No

Can you show us anywhere in the constitution where it says the full house must vote on an impeachment inquiry?

Yes or no?

It doesn't have to say "The full House". It says "The House". It doesn't say "the Speaker and a highly partisan committee chairman". "The House" means "The House", ALL OF IT. I have no doubt the left will continue to ignore the Constitution anyway but if they think the American people won't object to their tactics they're making a mistake and will pay dearly for it in 2020.

Then it will be remarkably easy for you to quote the constitution saying that a full vote of the house is necessary to open an impeachment inquiry.

Please do so.

Quite babbling this lie. YOU HAVE BEEN SHOWN THE VERBIAGE AND WHY IT MUST OCCUR>!

Telling this lie over and over doesn't make it true! Heir Goebbels...

 

[Lesh]

Telling this lie over and over doesn't make it true!

The stop fucking doin it moron.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

An impeachment inquiry is not an impeachment it's just part of the process.

Then you admit that there is no where in the constitution that a full house vote is required for an impeachment inquiry.

Thank you.

LOL... It is implied...

Says you, citing you.

No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.

And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.

Get used to the idea

None of this has been done
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives

The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.

Right they are bound to not hide their vote from the voters

They are bound to make only 1 vote each which keeps all votes equal

Only a full house voting on any action can be constitutional !!!

 

[Billy_Bob]

Telling this lie over and over doesn't make it true!

The stop fucking doin it moron.

Poor libtard is triggered by the truth... Now quit lying lesh...

 

[Billy_Bob]

Just checked the Congressional record.. Still no authorization by the HOR to conduct an impeachment investigation into the president..

The Circus continues...

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

A Grand jury of idiots can indict a ham sandwich.. The House is one big lot of idiots... The Constitution demands that the house have sole power but a few in the house seem to think they dont have to get consent... Its all going to back fire..

I don't fully blame the Left.
ALL of this could EASILY have been avoided .......The right GAVE the House to the Left...asking for it.

If only Republicans had gotten off their lazy asses and voted in the midterms. But no, they were still high on Trump's 2016 victory and didn't care.
Also, Republicans voluntarily QUIT in mass numbers from the House and that hurt.
So, it seems "Republicans" were as complicit in this entire mess as the democrats are. Republicans grabbed ankles, Democrats shoved it where the Sun doesn't shine.

OR.....the other explanation is that it's ALL a Dog & Pony show to keep Americans at each other. Good Cop Bad Cop game played by those in Washington against those outside the Belt. I say the vast majority of Americans are clueless to how they're being fooled and manipulated.

All that is required for evil men to prevail is for Lazy republicans to do NOTHING......not even vote.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.

Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...

There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written.. It requires consent of the HOR.


pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?


Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.


DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?

Yes or No

Should the House impeach Trump, what will likely happen is the Republican Senate will refuse to conduct a trial – again, further proof of the right’s contempt for the Constitution, our democratic institutions, and the will of the people.

Can John Roberts throw the trial out like a normal judge can do with a regular trial?

John Roberts is shaking in his boots

This nation of men disagreeing with his vote with the liberals to make a 5-4 win will not stand

Roberts will get locked up by the majority of the men who judges it different

 

[GreenAndBlue]

A Grand jury of idiots can indict a ham sandwich.. The House is one big lot of idiots... The Constitution demands that the house have sole power but a few in the house seem to think they dont have to get consent... Its all going to back fire..

I don't fully blame the Left.
ALL of this could EASILY have been avoided .......The right GAVE the House to the Left...asking for it.

If only Republicans had gotten off their lazy asses and voted in the midterms.
Also, Republicans voluntarily QUIT in mass numbers from the House and that hurt.
So, it seems "Republicans" were as complicit in this entire mess as the democrats are. Republicans grabbed ankles, Democrats shoved it where the Sun doesn't shine.

All that is required for evil men to prevail is for Lazy republicans to do NOTHING......not even vote.

This last election in North Carolina shows the improvement of the men and military for trump

The deep state WILL get locked up

The patriots are on FIRE !!

 

[Skylar]

Then you admit that there is no where in the constitution that a full house vote is required for an impeachment inquiry.

Thank you.

LOL... It is implied...

Says you, citing you.

No where in the constitution itself does it say that an impeachment inquiry requires a full vote of the House.

And the house isn't bound to what YOU insist the constitution is supposed to mean, and any extra-constittional requirement that you make up. Constitutionally, you're nobody, Billy.

Get used to the idea

None of this has been done
The House's Role
The House brings impeachment charges against federal officials as part of its oversight and investigatory responsibilities. Individual Members of the House can introduce impeachment resolutions like ordinary bills, or the House could initiate proceedings by passing a resolution authorizing an inquiry. The Committee on the Judiciary ordinarily has jurisdiction over impeachments, but special committees investigated charges before the Judiciary Committee was created in 1813. The committee then chooses whether to pursue articles of impeachment against the accused official and report them to the full House. If the articles are adopted (by simple majority vote), the House appoints Members by resolution to manage the ensuing Senate trial on its behalf. These managers act as prosecutors in the Senate and are usually members of the Judiciary Committee. The number of managers has varied across impeachment trials but has traditionally been an odd number. The partisan composition of managers has also varied depending on the nature of the impeachment, but the managers, by definition, always support the House’s impeachment action.
Impeachment | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives

The house is bound by its constitutional requirements. And there is no constitutional requirement to vote on an impeachment inquiry.

Right they are bound to not hide their vote from the voters

They are bound to make only 1 vote each which keeps all votes equal

Only a full house voting on any action can be constitutional !!!

Says you, pretending you're the constitution.

Back in reality, the entire House votes when assigning committee members, with all votes being equal. Once the committees are set, these committees wield authority within their sphere of influence sufficient to open investigations without the need for a full House vote.

You say 'uh-uh'. And yet House committees have been opening investigations without full House votes. Under Democrats, under Republicans.

Once again, Green.....your feelings on a legal matter don't have any relevance to the actual law.

 

[Skylar]

U.S. Senate Rejects The Impeachment from the House of Representatives due to the fact that it is Illegitimate because the House never held a vote...forces House Democrats - to include those 'vulnerable' - to either officially going on record as being for Impeachment or drop it....?!

And show us where in the constitution a full vote of the House is necessary to conduct an impeachment inquiry.

Constitution of the United States - We the People

Show us. Don't tell us.

I will repeat, the Constitution It is very explicit... THE HOUSE MUST ACT to do anything on impeachment.

Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution states: "The House of Representatives shall [choose] their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Read the Constitution, it explicitly states the "House of Representatives shall" and "sole power" not piglosie will...

There is nothing ambiguous about how it is written.. It requires consent of the HOR.


pay attention.. "The House of Representatives ... shall have the sole Power of Impeachment."

Now read it slowly.... If the House of Representatives has the sole power, how do they start?


Please tell me how you can start impeachment anything without the consent of the HOR.


DO YOU HAVE CONSENT OF THE HOR where SOLE POWER TO IMPEACH RESIDES?

Yes or No

Should the House impeach Trump, what will likely happen is the Republican Senate will refuse to conduct a trial – again, further proof of the right’s contempt for the Constitution, our democratic institutions, and the will of the people.

Can John Roberts throw the trial out like a normal judge can do with a regular trial?

John Roberts is shaking in his boots

This nation of men disagreeing with his vote with the liberals to make a 5-4 win will not stand

Roberts will get locked up by the majority of the men who judges it different

Says your imagination. Remember, this elaborate pseudo-legal fantasy you've made up is gloriously irrelevant to the the real world.

And you playing make believe, pretending you're John Roberts has no more relevance than you playing pretending you're the constitution.

Again, Green......your feelings don't define law. No matter how much you might wish they did.