Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Is there some objective reason why you cited this number of troops at the border?Yeah, and 5,600 active military troops at the southern border is just right, isn't it?
Let's not talk about wasteful overkill, please.
hey're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages ', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.}}}}}}}}The FBI is no longer a law enforcement agency; it is now a politicized arm of a criminal syndicate operating under the guise of a political Party, the DNC; it has helped destroy evidence, engaged in illegal domestic spying on behalf of that Party, assisted in treasonous acts committed by the same Party, and other crimes against our country. It's job now is to aid in extorting perjured testimony from designated enemies of the Democratic Party, a job it seems to enjoy doing now. It's ironic how they're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages in while pretending to be 'investigating Russian collusion n stuff', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.
are you fn bonkers You just gave a description of your master Trump
Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
Is there some objective reason why you cited this number of troops at the border?Yeah, and 5,600 active military troops at the southern border is just right, isn't it?
Let's not talk about wasteful overkill, please.
With another Central American refugee/ violent assault specialists caravan reportedly on the way if those troops are not now at the border they soon should be.
At any rate good luck with your defective analogies.
Between your lies, wacko conspiracies, and those off topic distractions, good riddance. Seek help.Congratulations for being the first asshole to beWe have several pages dedicated to off topic conspiracies from folks who need to get off planet wacko.
banished to my ignore list. Bye.
Who are the "Russian cronies" again? Evidence of "Comey and FBI erasing Clinton's emails"? "Other evidence of felonies and treason"?hey're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages ', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.}}}}}}}}The FBI is no longer a law enforcement agency; it is now a politicized arm of a criminal syndicate operating under the guise of a political Party, the DNC; it has helped destroy evidence, engaged in illegal domestic spying on behalf of that Party, assisted in treasonous acts committed by the same Party, and other crimes against our country. It's job now is to aid in extorting perjured testimony from designated enemies of the Democratic Party, a job it seems to enjoy doing now. It's ironic how they're aping the exact same tactics Putin engages in while pretending to be 'investigating Russian collusion n stuff', when it's obvious who relates more to Putin and follows his lead.
are you fn bonkers You just gave a description of your master Trump
Yes, you're stupid; we know all about Mueller, his helping Hillary out with lining here cronies pockets in Russian deals, and we know about his millions invested in Russian deals on his own, moron. We know about Comey and the FBI helping Hillary erase her emails and the other evidence of her felonies and treason, shithead. Now run along and play 'Parrot' with the other spammers, kid.
So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
Ha coward, don't laugh, answer?So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
Ha coward, don't laugh, answer?So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
Ha retard, if it was destroyed, how do you know it was evidence then? Maybe the emails were discussions about wedding plans right? You don't know, therefore you are a liar and a full blown piece of shit liar.So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
lol idiot thinks nobody knows; how does one produce evidence that was destroyed? We have Hillary admitting it was destroyed, and we have Comey admitting they helped her destroy it, tard. Your fellow mentally ill gimps take every thread off-topic, idiot.But continue playing Stupid. It becomes you, coward. You or any other Democrat vermin calling anybody 'liars' is just hilarious; you probably are mentally retarded enough to to beleive you and the other vermin have any credibility left at all. lol
Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
Liars and cowards aren't hard to expose on this forum. And you are exhibit A. Thanks for the heads up.Ha coward, don't laugh, answer?So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidence
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
ah, now it only has the typical ' I Touched You Last!!!' rubbish now. What a dork.
Ha retard, if it was destroyed, how do you know it was evidence then? Maybe the emails were discussions about wedding plans right? You don't know, therefore you are a liar and a full blown piece of shit liar.So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?Hillary actually destroyed evidence
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
lol idiot thinks nobody knows; how does one produce evidence that was destroyed? We have Hillary admitting it was destroyed, and we have Comey admitting they helped her destroy it, tard. Your fellow mentally ill gimps take every thread off-topic, idiot.But continue playing Stupid. It becomes you, coward. You or any other Democrat vermin calling anybody 'liars' is just hilarious; you probably are mentally retarded enough to to beleive you and the other vermin have any credibility left at all. lol
Liars and cowards aren't hard to expose on this forum. And you are exhibit A. Thanks for the heads up.Ha coward, don't laugh, answer?So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
ah, now it only has the typical ' I Touched You Last!!!' rubbish now. What a dork.
Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
They're going to be manufacturing evidence from this point on. Nobody is buying their attempts art distorting it, and their base is of course getting increasingly loony and hysterical; can't let them down now.
Yea right Sling Blade. They've been trying to "manufacture evidence" against Hillary going on fifty years, and they're still "manufacturing". What a bunch of pure dumb asses.Yea, "reverse Psychology" - any evidence = equals liars and off topic cowards. That would be you.Liars and cowards aren't hard to expose on this forum. And you are exhibit A. Thanks for the heads up.Ha coward, don't laugh, answer?So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
ah, now it only has the typical ' I Touched You Last!!!' rubbish now. What a dork.
Oh noes, it's 'reverse psychology'!!!' lol lol lol
But the evidence is not; Mueller’s team seizes “voluminous and complex” evidence in Roger Stone probeA well to do 72 year old political advisor is not a drug dealer. And it doesn't take 29 FBI agents, with their specially equipped fleet of SUVs and helicopter, to prevent an old man just rousted out of bed, from destroying evidence or putting up a fight (which is an absurd thought) or any otherTempest in a teapot and there goes graham again.There was a great potential that stone would destroy evidence, and serving arrest warrants has been shown to be a very dangerous business. One doesn't call up a drug dealer and tell him that he will be arrested the following day so that he has time to flush everything illegal down the toilet.
Why do people insist that right-wingers be treated like royalty, anyway? They are just like everyone else.
unlikely scenario you can dream up.
Good God...Stone knew he was going to jail. If he had any evidence that needed to be destroyed, as you theorize, it wouldn't be just sitting around for no good reason. It would have been long gone starting when he was originally indicted.
Don't be such an idiot which is what someone has to be to defend Herr Mueller's ridiculous wasteful unnecessary show of force. He, Mueller, is clearly off his rocker.
Have you read the thread topic there Goober? Didn't see much typed about Hillary.Ha retard, if it was destroyed, how do you know it was evidence then? Maybe the emails were discussions about wedding plans right? You don't know, therefore you are a liar and a full blown piece of shit liar.So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.Evidence of what, and your proof of where and how that evidence was obtained?
So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
lol idiot thinks nobody knows; how does one produce evidence that was destroyed? We have Hillary admitting it was destroyed, and we have Comey admitting they helped her destroy it, tard. Your fellow mentally ill gimps take every thread off-topic, idiot.But continue playing Stupid. It becomes you, coward. You or any other Democrat vermin calling anybody 'liars' is just hilarious; you probably are mentally retarded enough to to beleive you and the other vermin have any credibility left at all. lol
Tard thinks there were no threads on this. What a loser gimp. Actually thinks it gets to make demands on people, too, despite it's history of fake news shilling, lying, and trolling. lol the loon thinks it's relevant.
Hillary actually destroyed evidenceWell, intimidating congressional witnesses is a serious crime, and he was a threat to destroy evidence. Couldn't puzzle that out for yourself, eh?Just why does Lord Mueller treat the arrest of a harmless 72 year old political apparatchik like the D-Day invasion?
They're going to be manufacturing evidence from this point on. Nobody is buying their attempts art distorting it, and their base is of course getting increasingly loony and hysterical; can't let them down now.
Have you read the thread topic there Goober? Didn't see much typed about Hillary.Ha retard, if it was destroyed, how do you know it was evidence then? Maybe the emails were discussions about wedding plans right? You don't know, therefore you are a liar and a full blown piece of shit liar.So, the question was, "what evidence did Hillary destroy" with proof of course, and like a good little Trump Sheep coward, you didn't answer. As a matter of fact, you aren't going to answer, because you have no answer, therefore, you're just a liar. And, on top of that, you're an off topic coward.So playing stupid is your gimmick? Well, it's better than your usual attempts at lying and parroting rubbish, anyway, but that's not saying much. Try smoking even more meth and see if that works; most of the other Hilary fag hags seem to think it does.
lol idiot thinks nobody knows; how does one produce evidence that was destroyed? We have Hillary admitting it was destroyed, and we have Comey admitting they helped her destroy it, tard. Your fellow mentally ill gimps take every thread off-topic, idiot.But continue playing Stupid. It becomes you, coward. You or any other Democrat vermin calling anybody 'liars' is just hilarious; you probably are mentally retarded enough to to beleive you and the other vermin have any credibility left at all. lol
Tard thinks there were no threads on this. What a loser gimp. Actually thinks it gets to make demands on people, too, despite it's history of fake news shilling, lying, and trolling. lol the loon thinks it's relevant.
