Frankenstein
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2022
- 7,672
- 5,032
Yeah, if we were talking about want, and not mandate, that might hold waterIf Paul loves freedom he would allow people to wear a mask if they want and to not wear a mask if they want.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, if we were talking about want, and not mandate, that might hold waterIf Paul loves freedom he would allow people to wear a mask if they want and to not wear a mask if they want.
your post in context "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! NextWrong, that Is an incomplete quote with no link to see the rest.You fail to include that with every discussion of masks, included is social distances, vaccinations and boosters. Your bullshit quote is another example of your ignorance and stupidity.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!He’s a lying sack of shit.
You really areAnother lazy mfker.
When inconvenient information doesn’t fit the narrativeWrong, that Is an incomplete quote with no link to see the rest.You fail to include that with every discussion of masks, included is social distances, vaccinations and boosters. Your bullshit quote is another example of your ignorance and stupidity.
Obviously you can’t. You’ve yet to do it
Still no quotes ?
You being a complete science illiterate would make such an ignorant post.
Here is how it’s done.
And the mask mandates your god Fauci shoved down our throats have been shown had zero statistical impact on covid. Zero.
If Paul loves freedom he would allow people to wear a mask if they want and to not wear a mask if they want.
You guys are idiots, as usualThis just came in from "MedPage Today", and is interesting.
{...
Last week, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal in New Orleans revived a lawsuit brought by three doctors alleging that the FDA overstepped in its public statements about ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, the Associated Pressopens in a new tab or window reported.
The lawsuit argues FDA messaging such as, "I'm not a horse!" interfered with their practice, and in "most of that messaging," left out the human version of ivermectin that the plaintiffs were prescribing.
The lawsuitopens in a new tab or window was originally brought by otolaryngologist Mary Talley Bowden, MD, and critical care doctor Paul E. Marik, MD -- both of whom have faced professional repercussions after touting the anti-parasitic, among other controversies -- and emergency medicine doctor Robert L. Apter, MD.
A district court judge had dismissed the lawsuit in December, but the New Orleans appellate court argued that the FDA exceeded its authority under federal law, though normally government entities have more protections from civil lawsuits because of what's known as "sovereign immunity."
"FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise -- but not to endorse, denounce, or advise," Judge Don Willett, MA, JD, a Trump appointee, wrote for the panel, according to the AP. "The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA's Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to.
...}
If you want to understand why the FDA was wrong about Ivermectin, I can explain it.
The parasites it is used to kill, have no eyes, nose, etc., and work on protein sensors.
By dulling these sensors, the parasites do not recognize food and starve to death.
The cell ACE2 receptors of our own cells are the same sort of sensors, so by dulling them, our cells stop letting in corona viruses.
He is dumb, you’re dumbCorrect.
Those over 70 were 400 times more likely to die from covid than those under 40, so it should have been personal choice.
The lowest death toll would have been if those over 70 masked up and those under 40 did not.
Still no quotes about Fouci ? Dancing all over the place.,This just came in from "MedPage Today", and is interesting.
{...
Last week, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal in New Orleans revived a lawsuit brought by three doctors alleging that the FDA overstepped in its public statements about ivermectin as a COVID-19 treatment, the Associated Pressopens in a new tab or window reported.
The lawsuit argues FDA messaging such as, "I'm not a horse!" interfered with their practice, and in "most of that messaging," left out the human version of ivermectin that the plaintiffs were prescribing.
The lawsuitopens in a new tab or window was originally brought by otolaryngologist Mary Talley Bowden, MD, and critical care doctor Paul E. Marik, MD -- both of whom have faced professional repercussions after touting the anti-parasitic, among other controversies -- and emergency medicine doctor Robert L. Apter, MD.
A district court judge had dismissed the lawsuit in December, but the New Orleans appellate court argued that the FDA exceeded its authority under federal law, though normally government entities have more protections from civil lawsuits because of what's known as "sovereign immunity."
"FDA is not a physician. It has authority to inform, announce, and apprise -- but not to endorse, denounce, or advise," Judge Don Willett, MA, JD, a Trump appointee, wrote for the panel, according to the AP. "The Doctors have plausibly alleged that FDA's Posts fell on the wrong side of the line between telling about and telling to.
...}
If you want to understand why the FDA was wrong about Ivermectin, I can explain it.
The parasites it is used to kill, have no eyes, nose, etc., and work on protein sensors.
By dulling these sensors, the parasites do not recognize food and starve to death.
The cell ACE2 receptors of our own cells are the same sort of sensors, so by dulling them, our cells stop letting in corona viruses.
Institution. You should be in one.You really are
Here ya go boy
![]()
Fauci’s Mask Flip-Flop, Explained (by Economics)
Newly published emails from February 2020 undermine Dr. Fauci's claim that his early recommendation to not wear masks was motivated by fear of causing a mask-purchasing stampede.fee.org
Went to Devry Institute and graduatedInstitution. You should be in one.
In the meantime, conservatives died at a higher rate because of their failure to take the vaccine when it became available. Proof positive, you don’t know shit.I am anti-Trump, but he was correct about covid.
The correct strategy was to ignore it so that we developed herd immunity as quickly as possible. It could have been ended in 3 months, with only 30k deaths per month.
By delaying its ending out over 10 times longer, it killed over 10 times as many people.
Only with the demofks narrative! The inconvenient fact is there’s no data to support your statementIn the meantime, conservatives died at a higher rate because of their failure to take the vaccine when it became available. Proof positive, you don’t know shit.
So, you’re proud of graduating from a University that thinks your ideas are full,of shit ? What an effin hypocrite younare.Went to Devry Institute and graduated