Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Anything called "bipartisan" is almost always not bipartisan. Furthermore, you claimed that every country in the EU wants him gone. I didn't know Ukraine had an IMF which stands for "International Monetary Fund."How about if I post a bipartisan letter from congress urging the admin to get rid of the prosecutor?. If that exists and I post it would you concede that this wasn’t Joe acting alone?You failed to post any actual evidence. Obama's support is hardly evidence in your favor. Obama was involved in the corruption.There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.And do you think Biden convinced multiple governments to get rid of the prosecutor for the same reason? Do you think Biden did allWell let's see what Zelensky finds and go from there, because none of us know what really happened, and the Democrats were never expecting a Republican President, and figured they had all their bases covered.
What I think Joe did was get the prosecutor fired for going after the company his son worked for. Burisma has been long known for it's corruption in that country, and it's my theory that Hunter was hired for protection.
of this on his own accord?
So where were all these other governments to get rid of him? I only seen one do that, and it was our government.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
As I always say, adhesion to a hardcore partisan ideology distorts both perceptions and thought processes.You already shown an embarrassing inability to comprehend simple english. I’m still waiting for that quote where I said “campaign funds” .Of course you did. You stated it as if it was fact. I have seen no evidence to support such a claim.No I didn’t. Do 5 minutes of research and you will see evidence backing that upThe clam that multiple governments wanted the prosecutor fired. You made the claim by assuming it in your question.What claim? I asked two questionsI keep seeing Dims posting this claim, but I've never seen any evidence of it.
Do your own research. I don’t think you will because you know what I’m saying is the truth
He is either a complete moron or a worthless troll. At this point it’s been laid out crystal clear.Except for the last one, none of those things are actual crimes, and that one never happened. He didn't solicit campaign funds from a foreign government, you lying puss bag.Abuse of power, misuse of public office, breaking public trust, soliciting campaign aid from a foreign governmentThat's a good question. What actual crime are they going to accuse Trump of committing?Could be. That's the risk they're taking, but they can't back out now without looking even worse.It is proof that the Dems have MADE THEMSELVES LOOK BAD in the process...or rather what you stated in the OP
Hello
We'll see what the Articles of Impeachment say, if they take it that far.
.
Adam Schiff and Nazi Piglosi can be charged with all of those.
How many times do we have to explain this...
Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one... It does not state you committed a crime but are you fit to do your job...
Example:
You could commit a crime and still retain your job, the NFL has loads examples of that... There is a fair few Presidents who committed crimes (Clinton Perjury, Reagan Iran Contra,...), some big and some small, but none of those crimes were deemed fireable offences. Again this doesn't exonerate them of crimes.
So how to get impeached? Well commit a crime which deemed as fireable. If you screw the boss's daughter, it is not a crime but ain't keeping your job (unless your the son-in- law).
So the question is Trump's actions impeachable... Again this is a political process. He coerced a foreign country to open and investigation on his political rival... that way past what Nixon did if the evidence hold up which it looks like it is...
Biden’s son worked for the company under investigation you know that right? Just curious if you’re on the right road. Biden then threatened and pulled the trigger. Admitted it! Ouch extortion biglyHow about if I post a bipartisan letter from congress urging the admin to get rid of the prosecutor?. If that exists and I post it would you concede that this wasn’t Joe acting alone?You failed to post any actual evidence. Obama's support is hardly evidence in your favor. Obama was involved in the corruption.There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.And do you think Biden convinced multiple governments to get rid of the prosecutor for the same reason? Do you think Biden did allWell let's see what Zelensky finds and go from there, because none of us know what really happened, and the Democrats were never expecting a Republican President, and figured they had all their bases covered.
What I think Joe did was get the prosecutor fired for going after the company his son worked for. Burisma has been long known for it's corruption in that country, and it's my theory that Hunter was hired for protection.
of this on his own accord?
So where were all these other governments to get rid of him? I only seen one do that, and it was our government.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
How does that prove it wasn't quid pro quo? This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers.No shit sherlock. Biden was assigned to be point guy with Ukraine. This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers. You’re embarrassing yourself man.Even if they did want him gone, he remained until Biden demanded he be fired in return for $1 billion.Partisan talking point? No Ray, I’m pointing to actual things that disprove your narrative. If all these entities wanted this guy gone then it doesn’t matter what Biden said... it makes his actions that of multiple governments not personal gain. This is elementary stuff, how is it going over your head?There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.So where were all these other governments to get rid of him? I only seen one do that, and it was our government.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
It seems to me all you have is partisan talking points. Ignoring what Biden said about withholding funds to the Ukraine, his son getting a winning lottery ticket, the political unrest by the Democrats all point in one direction if you ask me. But you choose to ignore every one.
You’ve laid nothing outHe is either a complete moron or a worthless troll. At this point it’s been laid out crystal clear.Except for the last one, none of those things are actual crimes, and that one never happened. He didn't solicit campaign funds from a foreign government, you lying puss bag.Abuse of power, misuse of public office, breaking public trust, soliciting campaign aid from a foreign governmentThat's a good question. What actual crime are they going to accuse Trump of committing?Could be. That's the risk they're taking, but they can't back out now without looking even worse.
We'll see what the Articles of Impeachment say, if they take it that far.
.
Adam Schiff and Nazi Piglosi can be charged with all of those.
How many times do we have to explain this...
Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one... It does not state you committed a crime but are you fit to do your job...
Example:
You could commit a crime and still retain your job, the NFL has loads examples of that... There is a fair few Presidents who committed crimes (Clinton Perjury, Reagan Iran Contra,...), some big and some small, but none of those crimes were deemed fireable offences. Again this doesn't exonerate them of crimes.
So how to get impeached? Well commit a crime which deemed as fireable. If you screw the boss's daughter, it is not a crime but ain't keeping your job (unless your the son-in- law).
So the question is Trump's actions impeachable... Again this is a political process. He coerced a foreign country to open and investigation on his political rival... that way past what Nixon did if the evidence hold up which it looks like it is...
I’ve done my homework. I’m suggesting you do your own so you stop making fake statements and sounding like an idiot in these conversations.I don't do your homework.No I didn’t. Do 5 minutes of research and you will see evidence backing that upThe clam that multiple governments wanted the prosecutor fired. You made the claim by assuming it in your question.What claim? I asked two questionsI keep seeing Dims posting this claim, but I've never seen any evidence of it.And do you think Biden convinced multiple governments to get rid of the prosecutor for the same reason? Do you think Biden did all
of this on his own accord?
Your list basically says that Dims don't like the way he is running the government. No shit? How is that impeachable? The Constitution says "high crimes and misdemeanors." Your list contains no crimes or misdemeanors.He is either a complete moron or a worthless troll. At this point it’s been laid out crystal clear.Except for the last one, none of those things are actual crimes, and that one never happened. He didn't solicit campaign funds from a foreign government, you lying puss bag.Abuse of power, misuse of public office, breaking public trust, soliciting campaign aid from a foreign governmentThat's a good question. What actual crime are they going to accuse Trump of committing?Could be. That's the risk they're taking, but they can't back out now without looking even worse.
We'll see what the Articles of Impeachment say, if they take it that far.
.
Adam Schiff and Nazi Piglosi can be charged with all of those.
How many times do we have to explain this...
Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one... It does not state you committed a crime but are you fit to do your job...
Example:
You could commit a crime and still retain your job, the NFL has loads examples of that... There is a fair few Presidents who committed crimes (Clinton Perjury, Reagan Iran Contra,...), some big and some small, but none of those crimes were deemed fireable offences. Again this doesn't exonerate them of crimes.
So how to get impeached? Well commit a crime which deemed as fireable. If you screw the boss's daughter, it is not a crime but ain't keeping your job (unless your the son-in- law).
So the question is Trump's actions impeachable... Again this is a political process. He coerced a foreign country to open and investigation on his political rival... that way past what Nixon did if the evidence hold up which it looks like it is...
Producing evidence to support your sleazy claims is not my homework, moron.I’ve done my homework. I’m suggesting you do your own so you stop making fake statements and sounding like an idiot in these conversations.I don't do your homework.No I didn’t. Do 5 minutes of research and you will see evidence backing that upThe clam that multiple governments wanted the prosecutor fired. You made the claim by assuming it in your question.What claim? I asked two questionsI keep seeing Dims posting this claim, but I've never seen any evidence of it.
that was a typo, IMF and Ukraines own top officials. Since you are playing little word games instead of staying on topic I’m going to take that as a concession.No. Anything called "bipartisan" is almost always not bipartisan. Furthermore, you claimed that every country in the EU wants him gone. I didn't know Ukraine had an IMF which stands for "International Monetary Fund."How about if I post a bipartisan letter from congress urging the admin to get rid of the prosecutor?. If that exists and I post it would you concede that this wasn’t Joe acting alone?You failed to post any actual evidence. Obama's support is hardly evidence in your favor. Obama was involved in the corruption.There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.And do you think Biden convinced multiple governments to get rid of the prosecutor for the same reason? Do you think Biden did all
of this on his own accord?
So where were all these other governments to get rid of him? I only seen one do that, and it was our government.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
It’s not historical, it’s treasonous. They either have a crime or they don’t. Just because they wished for one doesn’t trump trump’s constitutional rights. He’s a citizen and protected against illegal search and seizure laws. They need warrantsThe Articles of Impeachment would require more specifics than we're getting now. Specifics behind which the Dems would have to stand in historical terms.What document and why do you need it? Either there’s a crime to investigate or not. Our rule of law doesn’t allow to point at an individual and say let’s find dirt! Did you leave the country?Everything is just noise and guesses and assumptions and bullshit until we see that document.That's a good question. What actual crime are they going to accuse Trump of committing?Could be. That's the risk they're taking, but they can't back out now without looking even worse.It is proof that the Dems have MADE THEMSELVES LOOK BAD in the process...or rather what you stated in the OP
Hello
We'll see what the Articles of Impeachment say, if they take it that far.
.
.
Last time I checked trump’s still a citizen and is allowed the same rights as you
by the way, mueller shared his document and didn’t find dirt
I assumed that would be obvious.
.
You have laid out your idiocy and bogus claims crystal clear.He is either a complete moron or a worthless troll. At this point it’s been laid out crystal clear.Except for the last one, none of those things are actual crimes, and that one never happened. He didn't solicit campaign funds from a foreign government, you lying puss bag.Abuse of power, misuse of public office, breaking public trust, soliciting campaign aid from a foreign governmentThat's a good question. What actual crime are they going to accuse Trump of committing?Could be. That's the risk they're taking, but they can't back out now without looking even worse.
We'll see what the Articles of Impeachment say, if they take it that far.
.
Adam Schiff and Nazi Piglosi can be charged with all of those.
How many times do we have to explain this...
Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one... It does not state you committed a crime but are you fit to do your job...
Example:
You could commit a crime and still retain your job, the NFL has loads examples of that... There is a fair few Presidents who committed crimes (Clinton Perjury, Reagan Iran Contra,...), some big and some small, but none of those crimes were deemed fireable offences. Again this doesn't exonerate them of crimes.
So how to get impeached? Well commit a crime which deemed as fireable. If you screw the boss's daughter, it is not a crime but ain't keeping your job (unless your the son-in- law).
So the question is Trump's actions impeachable... Again this is a political process. He coerced a foreign country to open and investigation on his political rival... that way past what Nixon did if the evidence hold up which it looks like it is...
Show us where the IMF demanded that the prosecutor be fired.that was a typo, IMF and Ukraines own top officials. Since you are playing little word games instead of staying on topic I’m going to take that as a concession.No. Anything called "bipartisan" is almost always not bipartisan. Furthermore, you claimed that every country in the EU wants him gone. I didn't know Ukraine had an IMF which stands for "International Monetary Fund."How about if I post a bipartisan letter from congress urging the admin to get rid of the prosecutor?. If that exists and I post it would you concede that this wasn’t Joe acting alone?You failed to post any actual evidence. Obama's support is hardly evidence in your favor. Obama was involved in the corruption.There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.So where were all these other governments to get rid of him? I only seen one do that, and it was our government.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
Of course you do, cause you can’t winthat was a typo, IMF and Ukraines own top officials. Since you are playing little word games instead of staying on topic I’m going to take that as a concession.No. Anything called "bipartisan" is almost always not bipartisan. Furthermore, you claimed that every country in the EU wants him gone. I didn't know Ukraine had an IMF which stands for "International Monetary Fund."How about if I post a bipartisan letter from congress urging the admin to get rid of the prosecutor?. If that exists and I post it would you concede that this wasn’t Joe acting alone?You failed to post any actual evidence. Obama's support is hardly evidence in your favor. Obama was involved in the corruption.There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.So where were all these other governments to get rid of him? I only seen one do that, and it was our government.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
And why they wanted him fired.Show us where the IMF demanded that the prosecutor be fired.that was a typo, IMF and Ukraines own top officials. Since you are playing little word games instead of staying on topic I’m going to take that as a concession.No. Anything called "bipartisan" is almost always not bipartisan. Furthermore, you claimed that every country in the EU wants him gone. I didn't know Ukraine had an IMF which stands for "International Monetary Fund."How about if I post a bipartisan letter from congress urging the admin to get rid of the prosecutor?. If that exists and I post it would you concede that this wasn’t Joe acting alone?You failed to post any actual evidence. Obama's support is hardly evidence in your favor. Obama was involved in the corruption.There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
It was quid pro quo, I never said it wasn’t. Biden used aid as leverage to get the guy firedHow does that prove it wasn't quid pro quo? This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers.No shit sherlock. Biden was assigned to be point guy with Ukraine. This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers. You’re embarrassing yourself man.Even if they did want him gone, he remained until Biden demanded he be fired in return for $1 billion.Partisan talking point? No Ray, I’m pointing to actual things that disprove your narrative. If all these entities wanted this guy gone then it doesn’t matter what Biden said... it makes his actions that of multiple governments not personal gain. This is elementary stuff, how is it going over your head?There is a bipartisan letter from our congress urging the administration to remove the prosecutor, theres the support of our executive branch, the support of the European Union and the support of Ukraine’s own IMF to remove this guy because he was doing nothing to stop corruption.
Have you done any independent research on this subject? Look for hard evidence not just partisan talking points. That’s the first thing you should have done so you didn’t spend days making false accusations
It seems to me all you have is partisan talking points. Ignoring what Biden said about withholding funds to the Ukraine, his son getting a winning lottery ticket, the political unrest by the Democrats all point in one direction if you ask me. But you choose to ignore every one.
To protect his corrupt son.It was quid pro quo, I never said it wasn’t. Biden used aid as leverage to get the guy firedHow does that prove it wasn't quid pro quo? This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers.No shit sherlock. Biden was assigned to be point guy with Ukraine. This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers. You’re embarrassing yourself man.Even if they did want him gone, he remained until Biden demanded he be fired in return for $1 billion.Partisan talking point? No Ray, I’m pointing to actual things that disprove your narrative. If all these entities wanted this guy gone then it doesn’t matter what Biden said... it makes his actions that of multiple governments not personal gain. This is elementary stuff, how is it going over your head?It seems to me all you have is partisan talking points. Ignoring what Biden said about withholding funds to the Ukraine, his son getting a winning lottery ticket, the political unrest by the Democrats all point in one direction if you ask me. But you choose to ignore every one.
An investigation of a company his son was working with! That’s extortion and illegal. Thanks for finally admitting itIt was quid pro quo, I never said it wasn’t. Biden used aid as leverage to get the guy firedHow does that prove it wasn't quid pro quo? This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers.No shit sherlock. Biden was assigned to be point guy with Ukraine. This is like trying to explain algebra to preschoolers. You’re embarrassing yourself man.Even if they did want him gone, he remained until Biden demanded he be fired in return for $1 billion.Partisan talking point? No Ray, I’m pointing to actual things that disprove your narrative. If all these entities wanted this guy gone then it doesn’t matter what Biden said... it makes his actions that of multiple governments not personal gain. This is elementary stuff, how is it going over your head?It seems to me all you have is partisan talking points. Ignoring what Biden said about withholding funds to the Ukraine, his son getting a winning lottery ticket, the political unrest by the Democrats all point in one direction if you ask me. But you choose to ignore every one.
Again, do your homework... learn what high crimes and misdemeanors are...Your list basically says that Dims don't like the way he is running the government. No shit? How is that impeachable? The Constitution says "high crimes and misdemeanors." Your list contains no crimes or misdemeanors.He is either a complete moron or a worthless troll. At this point it’s been laid out crystal clear.Except for the last one, none of those things are actual crimes, and that one never happened. He didn't solicit campaign funds from a foreign government, you lying puss bag.Abuse of power, misuse of public office, breaking public trust, soliciting campaign aid from a foreign governmentThat's a good question. What actual crime are they going to accuse Trump of committing?
Adam Schiff and Nazi Piglosi can be charged with all of those.
How many times do we have to explain this...
Impeachment is not a criminal process but a political one... It does not state you committed a crime but are you fit to do your job...
Example:
You could commit a crime and still retain your job, the NFL has loads examples of that... There is a fair few Presidents who committed crimes (Clinton Perjury, Reagan Iran Contra,...), some big and some small, but none of those crimes were deemed fireable offences. Again this doesn't exonerate them of crimes.
So how to get impeached? Well commit a crime which deemed as fireable. If you screw the boss's daughter, it is not a crime but ain't keeping your job (unless your the son-in- law).
So the question is Trump's actions impeachable... Again this is a political process. He coerced a foreign country to open and investigation on his political rival... that way past what Nixon did if the evidence hold up which it looks like it is...
The quid pro quo claim has been emphatically debunked. You sleazy lying morons believe if you keep repeating it that you can fool people into believing it.
