Seriously, who here STILL believes that Mueller's report "fully exonerates" Trump?

As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."
/——/ I thought Trump was Putin’s puppet. Explain this: Putin calls U.S. treatment of admitted agent Butina an outrage - Reuters
Did Trump personally order her arrest?
/—-/ Yes- he tweeted it—- you moron
Post tweet (for lulz mostly).

So the US is a dictatorship where the proper channel for orders to arrest someone is by tweeting, because the word of the dictator is always followed?
 
There never was any evidence of collusion but the desperate left can't let it go. Mueller spent two years deflecting attention from the FBI's attempted coup.
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."
What exactly did Trump do that was illegal?
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."

Since zero evidence was given to show any “collusion” with Russia, yes, it’s DOES exonerate President Trump of the accusations.
 
Okay then, what evidence was presented in the Mueller report that shows trump colluded with Russia to steal the election?


Mueller left it up to either the DOJ or Congress to determine if "collusion" .....which is not technically a crime.......is enough of an IMMORAL......UNETHICAL and UNPATRIOTIC offense.

NO ONE can deny that Trump called for Russian help to win

NO ONE can deny that his son, son in law and campaign chair met with Russian on dirt against Hillary

NO ONE can deny Trump's "love" for WIKILEAKS' stealings

NO ONE can deny that Kushner wanted a back-door channel with Russia

NO ONE can deny that Trump lied about his on-going business dealings with the Moscow Tower.

etc...

Really? Because Mueller denied it

Mueller DID NOT deny any of it. Trump said he was exonerated. Mueller said he could not exonerate the President.
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."



Guess what? It was Mueller's RESPONSIBILITY to come up with a clear fucking decision on obstruction. HE DID NOT do that.... why may you ask? because he's in the game with the Democrats. Lets just drag this investigation out further. He knew damn well what he was doing. It's all about giving the democrats in congress more fuel to try to investigate, team up with the news media to create a narrative going into the next presidential election. This in their minds allows them to look into every aspect of Trumps previous life... even though it has nothing to do with Russians interfering in an election. It's not about investigating Russian interference, its about investigating someone whos politics they do not like , and fear that he would overturn everything Obama accomplished.

So the clinton campaign payed nearly a million dollars to Fusion GPS for what exactly? information out of Russia that is not verifiable? put together by a foreign agent who did not like Trump in the first place? Information by the way which was meant to sway the US election towards the Democrat candidate.... Add in a set up meeting with a Russian lawyer at Trump tower who was linked to Fusion GPS, and attended Democrat rallies. looks like foreign collusion to me. We need an investigation.... which is why the Democrats are doing everything they can to get rid of Barr. they are scared shitless because of their own corrupt actions, which they rightly should be. Dont align yourself with such pieces of shit if you are a thinking person.
 
Okay then, what evidence was presented in the Mueller report that shows trump colluded with Russia to steal the election?


Mueller left it up to either the DOJ or Congress to determine if "collusion" .....which is not technically a crime.......is enough of an IMMORAL......UNETHICAL and UNPATRIOTIC offense.

NO ONE can deny that Trump called for Russian help to win

NO ONE can deny that his son, son in law and campaign chair met with Russian on dirt against Hillary

NO ONE can deny Trump's "love" for WIKILEAKS' stealings

NO ONE can deny that Kushner wanted a back-door channel with Russia

NO ONE can deny that Trump lied about his on-going business dealings with the Moscow Tower.

etc...

Really? Because Mueller denied it

Mueller DID NOT deny any of it. Trump said he was exonerated. Mueller said he could not exonerate the President.
I provided no facts to indict him. Therefore, he exonerated him
 
Okay then, what evidence was presented in the Mueller report that shows trump colluded with Russia to steal the election?


Mueller left it up to either the DOJ or Congress to determine if "collusion" .....which is not technically a crime.......is enough of an IMMORAL......UNETHICAL and UNPATRIOTIC offense.

NO ONE can deny that Trump called for Russian help to win

NO ONE can deny that his son, son in law and campaign chair met with Russian on dirt against Hillary

NO ONE can deny Trump's "love" for WIKILEAKS' stealings

NO ONE can deny that Kushner wanted a back-door channel with Russia

NO ONE can deny that Trump lied about his on-going business dealings with the Moscow Tower.

etc...

Really? Because Mueller denied it

Mueller DID NOT deny any of it. Trump said he was exonerated. Mueller said he could not exonerate the President.

He didn't. The evidence he laid out did. It clearly established a lack of a prima facie case let alone one beyond a reasonable doubt.

What statute did Trump supposedly violate? Whats the text say?
 
Okay then, what evidence was presented in the Mueller report that shows trump colluded with Russia to steal the election?


Mueller left it up to either the DOJ or Congress to determine if "collusion" .....which is not technically a crime.......is enough of an IMMORAL......UNETHICAL and UNPATRIOTIC offense.

NO ONE can deny that Trump called for Russian help to win

NO ONE can deny that his son, son in law and campaign chair met with Russian on dirt against Hillary

NO ONE can deny Trump's "love" for WIKILEAKS' stealings

NO ONE can deny that Kushner wanted a back-door channel with Russia

NO ONE can deny that Trump lied about his on-going business dealings with the Moscow Tower.

etc...

Really? Because Mueller denied it

Mueller DID NOT deny any of it. Trump said he was exonerated. Mueller said he could not exonerate the President.
I provided no facts to indict him. Therefore, he exonerated him

These people dont understand the justice system
 
Okay then, what evidence was presented in the Mueller report that shows trump colluded with Russia to steal the election?


Mueller left it up to either the DOJ or Congress to determine if "collusion" .....which is not technically a crime.......is enough of an IMMORAL......UNETHICAL and UNPATRIOTIC offense.

NO ONE can deny that Trump called for Russian help to win

NO ONE can deny that his son, son in law and campaign chair met with Russian on dirt against Hillary

NO ONE can deny Trump's "love" for WIKILEAKS' stealings

NO ONE can deny that Kushner wanted a back-door channel with Russia

NO ONE can deny that Trump lied about his on-going business dealings with the Moscow Tower.

etc...

Yet the reason we are in this mess is because Clinton paid for Russian gossip and the FBI passed it off as credible information. Are you concerned about that?
 
Yet the reason we are in this mess is because Clinton paid for Russian gossip and the FBI passed it off as credible information. Are you concerned about that?


I'm not here to defend Hillary, nor is this thread about her......

But check out what Carter Page was doing

Check out what Manafort was doing

Check out what Papadapolous was doing

....................and then of course, you can always fall back to the same fucking excuse of '''........but, but, Hillary......."
 
Yet the reason we are in this mess is because Clinton paid for Russian gossip and the FBI passed it off as credible information. Are you concerned about that?


I'm not here to defend Hillary, nor is this thread about her......

But check out what Carter Page was doing

Check out what Manafort was doing

Check out what Papadapolous was doing

....................and then of course, you can always fall back to the same fucking excuse of '''........but, but, Hillary......."
What was Carter doing?

What was Manafort doing?

What was Papadapolous doing?
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."

Gnat, you're dumb as a fucking cat turd.

You have no ability to reason, and you simply ape the bullshit from Soros hate sites. I get it, you're a shit flinging feral baboon.

See stupid fuck, prosecutors don't "exonerate." Prosecutors can CHARGE, or DECLINE to charge. That is ALL they can do.

Do you grasp that, you drooling fucking moron? :dunno:
 
prosecutors don't "exonerate." Prosecutors can CHARGE, or DECLINE to charge



OK, Mr Fuckhead..........

Did Barr EXONERATE Trump????..............Yes or No??

Has Trump stated that....based on Barr's summary....he was FULLY EXONERATED??....... Yes or No?

See, you Trump ass kissers get caught up on your own fucking stupidity and actually flaunt your stupidity through your LAME use of semantics.

Read, Learn, and stop being a fucking ass kisser.
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."
You have evidence of something?? Wow
 
OK, Mr Fuckhead..........

Did Barr EXONERATE Trump????..............Yes or No??

Gnat, you're dumb as a fucking cat turd.

You have no ability to reason, and you simply ape the bullshit from Soros hate sites. I get it, you're a shit flinging feral baboon.

See stupid fuck, prosecutors don't "exonerate." Prosecutors can CHARGE, or DECLINE to charge. That is ALL they can do.

Do you grasp that, you drooling fucking moron? :dunno:


Has Trump stated that....based on Barr's summary....he was FULLY EXONERATED??....... Yes or No?

See, you Trump ass kissers get caught up on your own fucking stupidity and actually flaunt your stupidity through your LAME use of semantics.

Read, Learn, and stop being a fucking ass kisser.

Prosecutors don't exonerate, stupid fuck.

Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada found no evidence of criminal acts by the President.

No collusion, which he went to great pains to explain doesn't even exist - the whole witch hunt was based on a fraud. No conspiracy, and no evidence of obstruction.

Oh yes, Herr Weissman whined that the president fire Comey - who the fuck cares? Stated the absolute fact that the witch hunt was a witch hunt, well DUH!

Weissman is a cvnt and belongs in prison - I have confidence he will be incarcerated soon. (That means "go to jail," you drooling retard.)

But the witch hunt after TWO FUCKING YEARS, found no crimes.

You filthy fucks lost, you staged a coup, but it failed.
 
Prosecutors don't exonerate, stupid fuck.


What a fucking moron getting caught in his own stupidity


Is BARR a prosecutor???................Yes or No???

Did BARR exonerate Trump?..........Yes or No???

LMAO
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."
ROFLMFAO

Welcome to our world!

Now, it's your turn...
Lock Him Up, Lock Him up
 
As I once stated.........Trump acolytes and sycophants CAN foolishly believe that

Barr "fully exonerated" Trump

Trump "fully exonerated" Trump

Conway "fully exonerated" Trump

Putin and the Russian so-called media "fully exonerated" Trump

BUT........if your read the damn report, ANYONE with an education above 3rd grade would HAVE TO conclude that Mueller's report did NOT exonerate Trump.

Mueller......working under the CLEAR DOJ policy that a sitting president CANNOT be indicted........did the next best thing....

Mueller laid out clear evidence that TWO options are offered to the American public based on his findings:

1. Congress can undertale impeachment hearings.........and

2. Trump CAN be rightfully indicted AFTER he vacates the oval office....

Really.......simple as that IF one reads the entire report and not stooge Barr's mornic "summary."

Gnat, you're dumb as a fucking cat turd.

You have no ability to reason, and you simply ape the bullshit from Soros hate sites. I get it, you're a shit flinging feral baboon.

See stupid fuck, prosecutors don't "exonerate." Prosecutors can CHARGE, or DECLINE to charge. That is ALL they can do.

Do you grasp that, you drooling fucking moron? :dunno:



Totally agree with you Uncensored2008, !!!!!:thup:
 

Forum List

Back
Top