Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One additional issue.....
Cohen's attorneys were making a claim that the records seized from Cohen should fall under "attorney-client" privileges......
If Hannity vehemently claims that he was not Cohen's client, then ANY documentation between Cohen and Hannity does NOT fall under that privilege.
You CANNOT have it both ways.
Hannity is lying like the lil bitch he is -
What did he lie about?
Seriously? He claims there were no documents, no contracts, no money exchanged. The hearing was ALL ABOUT DOCUMENTS and Cohen's team spent several days attempting to protect his identity because THEY KNOW THERE ARE DOCUMENTS.
Hannity is a lying punk
Anyway, what on Earth does this have to do with possible Russian meddling in the election?
Anyway, what on Earth does this have to do with possible Russian meddling in the election?
We'll all find out very soon
Oh, so, you were at the hearing? Anyway, what on Earth does this have to do with possible Russian meddling in the election?
How so?Sure they do. I knew a lot of guys at my last job that "knew the law".How can any of these posters set any record straight when all they can do is parrot 3rd and 4th hand "news"?
It's kind of the law...You know regular folks watch law dramas and this comes up...
Actually in UK and Ireland the regular population know more about US law than there own country...
Appearing as the defendants in cases doesn't qualify as "knew the law"....
Oh, so, you were at the hearing? Anyway, what on Earth does this have to do with possible Russian meddling in the election?
Moron...........Mueller handed over the Cohen investigation to the DOJ AND NYC federal attorneys...Why the fuck do you bring the above up?
Now, if any of those documents confirm that Cohen DID go to Prague, then the shit will really hit the fan.....Stay tuned.
The fun part will also be if FOX decides to fire Hannity's sorry ass......Trump cultists will have a royal fit.
There's a few issues that need to be clarified on this forum regarding the "relationship" between Cohen and Hannity:
1. It was Cohen (no one else) who labeled Sean Hannity a CLIENT
2. Attorney-client privilege does NOT include the divulging of a client's name (as circuit courts have determined.) .......so, the claim that Hannity's name as a "client" should not be known, is invalid.
3. The exchange of money between an attorney and an individual is NOT a requisite to determine that the individual is a client.......For example, pro bono cases do not require payments.....
But, much more damaging to the Cohen-Hannity relationship COULD BE the exchange of legal advice (by Cohen) for the "payment" (by Hannity) in providing good press for Trump on his TV/Radio shows. This would certainly be very hard to prove, but I point it out solely because the relationship between these 2 men should have been openly disclosed much earlier.
Hiding in plain sight.Frank's problem is that I can handle ten of him, while ten of him can't handle one of me, Nat.
It is hilarious, looking at my posting numbers, to think I have time for a sock and a full writing career.
One additional issue.....
Cohen's attorneys were making a claim that the records seized from Cohen should fall under "attorney-client" privileges......
If Hannity vehemently claims that he was not Cohen's client, then ANY documentation between Cohen and Hannity does NOT fall under that privilege.
You CANNOT have it both ways.
Oh Christ, here we go again, any day now, any day now....
Patience, son....Have patience....Judgment day is coming, and you won't like it........LOL
Good point, Jake
Still on that "Jake" thing, Frankie???.........lol
Since when is 51%, 1/3?And ABC, CBS,NBC, MSNBC, CNN, NPR, Washington Post, and the New York Times are the bootlicking PR spokesman for the DNC!
Yes, the entire fucking planet (except for that 1/3 of the Trump cult members) are against you....Take some chips while you hide under your bed.
