Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If one were to make an argument with regard to the constitutionality of laws criminalizing prostitution, it would be based on the right to privacy guaranteed by the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and 14th Amendments.I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
Pornography is entitled to First Amendment protections because it’s form of free expression, where prostitution is not.
Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?
The issue as far as government goes, is that it is so intimate, and private; that they cannot be certain to recieve a cut of the profits. And the profits would be rather substantial. They simply cannot allow that much money to change hands without getting a piece of the action, so to speak...
I'd pay a woman to shut up during sex.I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
I'd pay a woman to shut up during sex.I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
But they also fine offenders. And contribute to the PIC.The issue as far as government goes, is that it is so intimate, and private; that they cannot be certain to recieve a cut of the profits. And the profits would be rather substantial. They simply cannot allow that much money to change hands without getting a piece of the action, so to speak...
But that's what they get by keeping it underground. How many people do you think file a schedule C for illegal income?
So why is it illegal if money changes hands?Sex is a normal act. It is not dirty or yuckyWhy is paying for sex a 'Crime?' It's a logical fair question. I suspect it has something to do with religious zealots of the past, forcing their agendas on others. If parties agree on a business transaction pertaining to sex, so be it. It's not a Government issue. As long as their adults, let them decide.
Decriminalizing X act leads to the normalization and acceptance of X act which leads to an anything goes, no boundaries type of society....you know, the kind of society immoral, indecent LefTards dream of.
Sometimes we have to step back and see things through a wider lens...Progressives hate that principle.
No reason it should be criminalized.
I agree...sex is amazing...I suggest people have as much sex as possible...sex should not be illegal. So what?
Prostitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.
Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns
All they do is complain, just like you. (-:Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?
Oh look, another white knight wannabe who thinks that women need to be saved from themselves.
Natural Rights! Make it Common under the Common Law!I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
Prostitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.
Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns
If Vice moves over to other lawlessness then prosecute that lawlessness
Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.
If it does....then prosecute the lawlessnessProstitution does not easily accept legalization. Like the legalization of drugs, the legalization of vice only gets more vice and lawlessness.
Amsterdam 'lawless jungle' at night, ombudsman warns
If Vice moves over to other lawlessness then prosecute that lawlessness
Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.
You miss the point completely. it has nothing to do with being okay or not okay. A robot cannot be exploited like humans can. it cannot be hurt or mistreated.Vice lends itself to lawlessness. There are just some acts and transactions that cannot be made fully legal. It might be better if robotics improves to the point where human interaction is taken out completely.
So it’s Ok to get a blow job from a robot but not from a human?
Interesting.
Apparently this is issue is why you joined the Republican Party which I find very odd. The RNC doesn’t give a shit about your libertarian beliefs. It would have made more sense to register as an independent...I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
