whitehall
Diamond Member
You can pretty much tie in abortion and prostitution. They are both demeaning and dangerous to women but they are issues that benefit and are kept legal by mostly liberal men.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dayum, where are you going with this??I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
Decriminalizing X act leads to the normalization and acceptance of X act which leads to an anything goes, no boundaries type of society....you know, the kind of society immoral, indecent LefTards dream of.
Sometimes we have to step back and see things through a wider lens...Progressives hate that principle.
So you like the idea of Father Government putting the brakes on activity that you don't approve of?
How conservative of you.
First world societies stay first world societies through law and order...you didn’t know this basic shit?
What else can I teach you?
First world societies stay first world societies through law and order...you didn’t know this basic shit?
What else can I teach you?
You can teach me why it's your business as to who fucks who.
I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.
First world societies stay first world societies through law and order...you didn’t know this basic shit?
What else can I teach you?
You can teach me why it's your business as to who fucks who.
Again, think big picture...wide lens...it’s what smart people do.
First world societies stay first world societies through law and order...you didn’t know this basic shit?
What else can I teach you?
You can teach me why it's your business as to who fucks who.
Again, think big picture...wide lens...it’s what smart people do.
Oh, I see. We allow prostitution and the next thing you know, murder is allowed.
It already is. Though unconstitutional laws prevent it for the large part. What consenting adults do in the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness isn’t really anyone’s business. Unless it infringes on a third parties pursuit of the same. It’s only the governments desire to get a cut of the monetary transaction that muddies the waters...Sorry bout that,
Regards,
- Paying whores for sex should never be a constitutional right, brothels will spring up all over America if so.
SirJamesofTexas
Sex is a normal act. It is not dirty or yuckyWhy is paying for sex a 'Crime?' It's a logical fair question. I suspect it has something to do with religious zealots of the past, forcing their agendas on others. If parties agree on a business transaction pertaining to sex, so be it. It's not a Government issue. As long as their adults, let them decide.
Decriminalizing X act leads to the normalization and acceptance of X act which leads to an anything goes, no boundaries type of society....you know, the kind of society immoral, indecent LefTards dream of.
Sometimes we have to step back and see things through a wider lens...Progressives hate that principle.
Worth every pennyIve never paid a woman for sex - I pay them to leave after sex.
Trump has had his share of high cost hookerswhat the do-gooder Trumpbots cant seem to fathom is par for their course-
Trump can do it and its ok - anyone else does it and it leads to murder, rape, and abortion.
F'em
Sex is a normal act. It is not dirty or yuckyWhy is paying for sex a 'Crime?' It's a logical fair question. I suspect it has something to do with religious zealots of the past, forcing their agendas on others. If parties agree on a business transaction pertaining to sex, so be it. It's not a Government issue. As long as their adults, let them decide.
Decriminalizing X act leads to the normalization and acceptance of X act which leads to an anything goes, no boundaries type of society....you know, the kind of society immoral, indecent LefTards dream of.
Sometimes we have to step back and see things through a wider lens...Progressives hate that principle.
No reason it should be criminalized.
So did Prince Harry and Michelle obama.Trump has had his share of high cost hookerswhat the do-gooder Trumpbots cant seem to fathom is par for their course-
Trump can do it and its ok - anyone else does it and it leads to murder, rape, and abortion.
F'em
He married one
That you are being a partisan dupe?Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?
Do you believe in freedom or not?
You don't have to like something in order to support it as a right.
It tells us you’re a liar, as ‘liberals’ support no such thing.Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?
I wouldn't say that Liberals show a disdain or hatred for women in this context.Prostitution is demeaning to women but supported by liberals. What does that tell you?
If one were to make an argument with regard to the constitutionality of laws criminalizing prostitution, it would be based on the right to privacy guaranteed by the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and 14th Amendments.I was reading an article from Politico Magazine about the case against the owners of Backpage and the free speech implications. I just can't see how the law that put them out of business can be upheld in court. But it got me thinking about something else. In this day and age spending money itself is legally equated with free speech.
With that foundation already laid, I now submit it's a first amendment right to get paid to get laid, even if it's not on camera. Years ago we showed that paying someone to have sex on camera was protected free speech. It's about time we extend that off camera, too.