Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No doubt that the unborn child is a separate entity GROWING inside the woman. Without help after birth the child will die.
A FETUS is not viable outside of the womb.
You get an A for sloganeering.
A fetus is not a slogan. It is just a fetus that cannot survive outside of the womb. Neither can the embryo. Do you consider an embryo a "child" too?
You are hitting every one of the pro-abortion sloganeering meme. Using the term fetus as if that inoculates you against the killing of the most innocent of society. Call the unborn something other then and unborn child and somehow that make pro-abortionists feel better. The unborn child is not is not part of the woman's body, if it were it could not be aborted nor born.
Never the less we are getting off topic. You seem impassioned about the genocidal abortion industry. Can you tell me how YOUR uterus is regulated? Can you? Can you tell us how hard it is for you to get birth control? Can you honestly? I'll tell you how hard, take an aspirin and hold it tightly between your knees, how easy is that? Tell me, how hard is it to call PP and go ahead and kill the life that is within you, go ahead, tell us.
It's not a "term." Fetuses and embryos is what they are.
The thread is not about me. I suggest you stop trying to make it personal. Try and act like an adult, please.
The ignorance is just amazing.
A FETUS is not viable outside of the womb.
You get an A for sloganeering.
A fetus is not a slogan. It is just a fetus that cannot survive outside of the womb. Neither can the embryo. Do you consider an embryo a "child" too?
You are hitting every one of the pro-abortion sloganeering meme. Using the term fetus as if that inoculates you against the killing of the most innocent of society. Call the unborn something other then and unborn child and somehow that make pro-abortionists feel better. The unborn child is not is not part of the woman's body, if it were it could not be aborted nor born.
Never the less we are getting off topic. You seem impassioned about the genocidal abortion industry. Can you tell me how YOUR uterus is regulated? Can you? Can you tell us how hard it is for you to get birth control? Can you honestly? I'll tell you how hard, take an aspirin and hold it tightly between your knees, how easy is that? Tell me, how hard is it to call PP and go ahead and kill the life that is within you, go ahead, tell us.
It's not a "term." Fetuses and embryos is what they are.
The thread is not about me. I suggest you stop trying to make it personal. Try and act like an adult, please.
The term fetus is just a word the pro-abortionist like to use. Because if they used the words unborn child, the inference is too bad even for them.
So you are posting as someone else, ok gottja. Now go ask them the same questions I asked you and get back to us.
OK, ask that person one question. HOW ARE THEIR UTERUS BEING REGULATED. Should be easy considering the OP said they were more regulated then guns.
The ignorance is just amazing.
More sloganeering.
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Yes, it is. But not in the way you think.The ignorance is just amazing.
All very pro-abortion, btw.It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Sounds like Hitler, Mao and Stalin
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Sounds like Hitler, Mao and Stalin
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Sounds like Hitler, Mao and Stalin
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Sounds like Hitler, Mao and Stalin
I'm old enough to remember when the NRA was invited into our schools to educate students on gun safety. Yes, I'm old, and I grew up in rural Alaska, but the NRA as an institution has changed as much as everything else has since then. It now operates as a lobby for gun manufacturers rather than for responsible gun owners who grew up with the traditions of hunting and shooting.
It has blamed everything from video games, to Hollywood to "gun-free zones" for escalating gun violence in the country. In 2010, the NRA held its convention in North Carolina in a location where guns were banned. Its cheery note to attendees told them to leave their guns at home. It seemed fine enough with a "gun-free zone" then. Charlotte Allen blames (the brutal mass murder in Newtown, Conn., last week on) a lack of men and the "over-feminization" of our school system. Autism and mental health have been blamed. A godless tolerance for homosexuals has been faulted. Several people have said God wouldn't show up in public schools where he's not wanted. Apparently, he's still smarting from the lack of audible prayer, so he allowed the shooting to happen.
One week after the massacre, the NRA, in a paranoid fit, proposed changes. Let's have more guns in schools! Armed guards have been present at many massacres and haven't been able to stop them. And who is supposed to pay for the wages and benefits for armed guards at every school in the nation? "The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun," says the NRA. It's a nice advertisement for gun sales but it's ludicrous. The bad guy in Tucson, Ariz., who shot Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was stopped because he was reloading. Should we have armed guards everywhere there has been a mass shooting? Schools, malls, theaters, grocery stores and churches? Are they proposing a jobs bill?
"If only those teachers had a gun," laments the NRA. At a time when teachers are blamed for far more than what is in their control, and for being "union thugs," you want them to carry a weapon? Seriously? Think about that for a minute. A company in Utah had profits jump 500 percent this week by selling BULLET-PROOF BACKPACKS FOR CHILDREN. Children should not be shouldering the panic. The best thing about little children is they haven't figured out yet that some people want to hurt them. Times have changed. If you're not a cynic by third grade, you're not paying attention.
I'm worried that again nothing will happen in the face of a great problem. The violence that destroyed so many lives in Newtown, Conn., has changed the discussion in this country on gun control, but will that be enough this time?
In Alaska, many of us need guns to fill our freezers, but if you need a 30-round clip you're a pretty poor hunter. If you are hoarding automatic (yes, they are legal) or semi-automatic weapons, you need Viagra.
Oh, that's right, it's about the "well-regulated militia." The Second Amendment was written by men who had fought alongside men who didn't survive their revolt against tyranny. They had the assistance of the French government. They used muskets. If you think it is your right or duty to overthrow the government at this point in time, you're going to need more than a few guns and monster clips. You'll need weapons-grade uranium, a few tanks, a submarine and an army of your own to go up against our 3 million strong military. You very well may need the aid of another country. Good luck with that, and I think your three-cornered hat may be on a little too tight. The same founders who thought a militia was a good idea would never have expanded gun ownership to blacks. The whole slavery situation could have gotten awkward quickly.
So the tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of kindergarteners, mall shoppers and moviegoers? Is that freedom?
More: Shannyn Moore: My Guns Are Less Regulated Than My Uterus
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Sounds like Hitler, Mao and Stalin
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
The idea of the 2nd amendment providing an armed citizenry that can overthrow its own government by force to retain its freedoms if needed disappeared 100 years ago.
If every single US citizen were armed with a semi-auto AR-15 and we had to fight our own military we'd last less than a week. They have thousands of tanks, thousands of artillery pieces, jets, helos, aircraft carriers, cruise missilles, heavy bombers, fighters, and nukes.
Sorry folks, if you still believe we can defend ourselves against a hostile takeover from within you live in a time when cars were still a novelty and the Wright Brothers had the most advanced aircraft in the world.
You cling to a fantasy that ended a century ago.
It's time for civilized people to regulate guns!
Sounds like Hitler, Mao and Stalin
Regulate does not mean confiscate - it means regulate.
