Shocker! A Liberal Attack On Success

In my experience there are few or no "left wingers" who post on the USMB. The word leftist and term left winger are used as pejoratives to describe anyone who doesn't support the dogma most self described 'conservatives' hold dear.

If one supports gun control, equal rights for all citizens, Roe v. Wade, opposes tax schemes to further enrich the wealthy, campaign finance reform, the PPACA and government agencies which protect the food we eat, the water we drink, the air we breath, the drugs we take they must be a communist, socialist, Marxist, statist monster.

Look at the new posts on any day, generally there is at least one posted by one of the local racists, one by a constitutional 'scholar', one from the Ministry of Truth rewriting history and several parroting the latest "Breaking News" broadcast that day on the Conspiracy Channel = Fox News. None of which are substantive and many are irrational rants by fools and liars.




"I can’t prove you are a Communist. But when I see a bird that quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, has feathers and webbed feet and associates with ducks—I’m certainly going to assume that he is a duck."
Sentinel, John (September 29, 1946). "Communist Expose The Case of the Duck". Milwaukee (WI) Sentinel.

Did you just quack?

A fowl ad hominem, classic PC.

You did note that I didn't leave you out; I do know how to appeal to narcissists. For those not in the know, PC works for the Ministry of Truth, she spends her days researching little know authors who have a unique perspective on history, one which starts with the conclusion and works backward to support their claim.

Iconoclasts they are not, they, like PC, are desperate for attention. They can be forgiven, for they work for money; PC, as do all parrots, works for crackers (the praise of those USMB members who are crackers).




1. "....authors who have a unique perspective on history, one which starts with the conclusion and works backward to support their claim."

Which hardly explains why you are never able to find any errors in what I offer.

After all, I construct flawless OPs which lead to undeniable conclusions....if I don't say so myself.
And, being objective, of course I am correct.



2. "... narcissists."

Since we both bring up this....'attitude'....

...let me offer an explanation, if not a perspective.

To a degree, you add to my narcissism, for the following reason.
Instead of Snow White, imagine Goliath living with the Seven Dwarfs.

How could he possibly not see himself through a similar prism?

Surrounded by you, and other intellectual dwarfs, how could I not see myself as head and shoulders above?

I mean, seriously.

Do you now understand your responsibility for said outcome?




But I did like the 'fowl' thing....see, you're learning.
You should be bringing me an apple.
 
Last edited:
"I can’t prove you are a Communist. But when I see a bird that quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, has feathers and webbed feet and associates with ducks—I’m certainly going to assume that he is a duck."
Sentinel, John (September 29, 1946). "Communist Expose The Case of the Duck". Milwaukee (WI) Sentinel.

Did you just quack?

A fowl ad hominem, classic PC.

You did note that I didn't leave you out; I do know how to appeal to narcissists. For those not in the know, PC works for the Ministry of Truth, she spends her days researching little know authors who have a unique perspective on history, one which starts with the conclusion and works backward to support their claim.

Iconoclasts they are not, they, like PC, are desperate for attention. They can be forgiven, for they work for money; PC, as do all parrots, works for crackers (the praise of those USMB members who are crackers).




1. "....authors who have a unique perspective on history, one which starts with the conclusion and works backward to support their claim."

Which hardly explains why you are never able to find any errors in what I offer.

After all, I construct flawless OPs which lead to undeniable conclusions....if I don't say so myself.
And, being objective, of course I am correct.



2. "... narcissists."

Since we both bring up this....'attitude'....

...let me offer an explanation, if not a perspective.

To a degree, you add to my narcissism, for the following reason.
Instead of Snow White, imagine Goliath living with the Seven Dwarfs.

How could he possibly not see himself through a similar prism?

Surrounded by you, and other intellectual dwarfs, how could I not see myself as head and shoulders above?

I mean, seriously.

Do you now understand your responsibility for said outcome?




But I did like the 'fowl' thing....see, you're learning.
You should be bringing me an apple.

An apple to go with your crackers? Sorry, Snow White you're not, though I can understand how you might think so (are there as many as seven mental dwarfs who thank you?).
 
Just how far, to what lengths....of should I ask, to what depths will Liberals sink in their efforts to attack 'success'?

Here....to set the stage, the explanation for the Left's hatred of capitalism and the free market, e.g., Wal-Mart: it is a system which produces winners and losers, a painful fact that the Left would rather not see.


There are Winners and Losers in North Korea
There are Winners and Losers in Cuba
There are Winners and Losers in Venezuela
There are Winners and Losers in China
There are Winners and Losers in Africa
There are Winners and Losers in Riyadh
There are Winners and Losers in Australia

Where in the World are there an absence of Winners and Losers? If America is so bad and corrupt, compare the demand level of people wanting to come to America vs. the rest of the World the Left would have US emulate?
 
You need a job commensurate with your constellation of skills....

....too bad Eli Whitney invented that darn cotton gin.

You mean unlike YOU, who, because you have no job, have fulfilled that measure perfectly...

btw, instead of dodging the argument you just lost, don't you want to try to contest the fact that long lines for low paying jobs such as those at Walmart indicate a dire need for work,

as opposed to indicating some sort of positive indication of the quality of the jobs?

silly left-wing idiot;

you admitted there is a dire need for work.
that destroys the left-wing argument that things are so much better now.
it also tells you obama isnt creating jobs at all; and IF job openings are available it is for low-paying jobs

good one idiot; and you losers are so hateful to WalMart

great job; show hatred and animosity to one of the only people hiring AT ALL in the tough obama years!

But, but, but...government doesn't create jobs....:eek:
 
um; the Left's next presidential sits, or sat; on the board of WalMart

understand?
oh and the loony Left would rather see people unemployed than working at WalMart; thats why they actually refuse to let WalMart build stores in some very blue areas. why should libs care?
they have hundreds of billions of other people's money to dole out in the form of welfare and food stamps

do you thing the RECORD welfare and food stamps on Progressive's watch is a coincidence?
I'm sorry does this interrupt your delusions? Wal-Mart doesn't pay their people enough money to not live off of state aid. How do you not know this?

So when will it start to sink in that the lefts continuous over spending and high unemployment is leading to inflation. Looked at the price of food, gas or just about anything else these days??

Because of the current administrations policies and the refusal to create jobs the money that would normally be enough to live on is just not making it any more. It ain't justt Wally worlds folks that are seeing this. Now it is not the business fault, they are caught up in the same sad economy Obummbler has imprisoned us in since the inception of his administration.

That is an asinine attempt at deflection. We call that a major fail.

Wal-Mart fails to pay their people...........um......Obama.
 
And then you go twisting my words. I don't want Public Schools to be disbanded, but improved upon. The only people I want to profit are the children.

So, what do you have to say for yourself, Disir?


I don't have to twist your words. I just need to kick back and let you spew long enough so your Libertopia becomes obvious.

You have lost this argument. Your ad hominem makes that clearly evident.

I haven't lost anything. You failed to make a comparison. You attempted to claim that I support the Common Core. You sitting there denying everything does not a winner make.
 
silly left-wing idiot;

you admitted there is a dire need for work.
that destroys the left-wing argument that things are so much better now.
it also tells you obama isnt creating jobs at all; and IF job openings are available it is for low-paying jobs

good one idiot; and you losers are so hateful to WalMart

great job; show hatred and animosity to one of the only people hiring AT ALL in the tough obama years!

I asked before so here's your chance. Tell us why Obama is to blame for the 30 year de-industrialization of America that led to American workers having to line up by the hundreds for shit jobs at Walmart.

Please be specific.



Easy.


Look at the results of the policies this wind-bag has instituted:



1. "Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession | The Weekly Standard


2. ... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun


Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Matthew 7:20





In Frazer's "The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion," he explains how primitive societies relied on their leader to intermediate with the gods, and obtain good weather, etc.
(The book served as an important cornerstone of "Apocalypse, Now.")


In modern society an astute voter expects the elected leader to be competent, to have effective policies to better the nation.

Clearly, Obama votes are hardly astute voters.
Raise your paw.

So now you've decided to switch from arguing (1) how great the low paying jobs at Walmart are, because people are lining up to get them,

to arguing that (2) people lining up to get low paying jobs at Walmart is symbolic of how badly our economy is doing, how poor the recovery is, and how terrible it is that wages are stagnant or even lower?

Very funny. Should I guess how many posts it will take you to be back to position (1)?
 
silly left-wing idiot;

you admitted there is a dire need for work.
that destroys the left-wing argument that things are so much better now.
it also tells you obama isnt creating jobs at all; and IF job openings are available it is for low-paying jobs

good one idiot; and you losers are so hateful to WalMart

great job; show hatred and animosity to one of the only people hiring AT ALL in the tough obama years!

You need to be arguing with PoliticalChic, not me. She's the one saying that all the people trying to get jobs at Walmart is why the country is doing so well.

She's praising the so-called Obama economy.




Wow...another shocker: a Liberal lying.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.

Do you deny, outright, citing the demand for Walmart jobs as a GOOD thing?

Please do.
 
silly left-wing idiot;

you admitted there is a dire need for work.
that destroys the left-wing argument that things are so much better now.
it also tells you obama isnt creating jobs at all; and IF job openings are available it is for low-paying jobs

good one idiot; and you losers are so hateful to WalMart

great job; show hatred and animosity to one of the only people hiring AT ALL in the tough obama years!

I asked before so here's your chance. Tell us why Obama is to blame for the 30 year de-industrialization of America that led to American workers having to line up by the hundreds for shit jobs at Walmart.

Please be specific.



Easy.


Look at the results of the policies this wind-bag has instituted:



1. "Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession | The Weekly Standard


2. ... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun


Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Matthew 7:20





In Frazer's "The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion," he explains how primitive societies relied on their leader to intermediate with the gods, and obtain good weather, etc.
(The book served as an important cornerstone of "Apocalypse, Now.")


In modern society an astute voter expects the elected leader to be competent, to have effective policies to better the nation.

Clearly, Obama votes are hardly astute voters.
Raise your paw.

All you've done is confirmed the long term effect of the de-industrialization of America.
 
I asked before so here's your chance. Tell us why Obama is to blame for the 30 year de-industrialization of America that led to American workers having to line up by the hundreds for shit jobs at Walmart.

Please be specific.



Easy.


Look at the results of the policies this wind-bag has instituted:



1. "Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession | The Weekly Standard


2. ... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun


Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Matthew 7:20





In Frazer's "The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion," he explains how primitive societies relied on their leader to intermediate with the gods, and obtain good weather, etc.
(The book served as an important cornerstone of "Apocalypse, Now.")


In modern society an astute voter expects the elected leader to be competent, to have effective policies to better the nation.

Clearly, Obama votes are hardly astute voters.
Raise your paw.

All you've done is confirmed the long term effect of the de-industrialization of America.





See what I mean about you Liberals lying every chance you get?
 
I don't have to twist your words. I just need to kick back and let you spew long enough so your Libertopia becomes obvious.

You have lost this argument. Your ad hominem makes that clearly evident.

I haven't lost anything. You failed to make a comparison. You attempted to claim that I support the Common Core. You sitting there denying everything does not a winner make.

Your snideness and false equivalency arguments have proven that your position has lost favor.
 
Shocker! A Liberal Attack On Success

The shocker, is a con trying to CONvince us that only cons are successful, when in reality, it's an attack on the rigging of the system in favor of greedy slime balls which is the base of the GOP.
 
Shocker! A Liberal Attack On Success

The shocker, is a con trying to CONvince us that only cons are successful, when in reality, it's an attack on the rigging of the system in favor of greedy slime balls which is the base of the GOP.



1. Don't be afraid to stand on your own...there's no "us."


2. The OP is quite specific: Wal-Mart, and charter schools are being attacked both by the Liberal NYTimes, and by Liberal posters in this thread.
They are both successes, and are attacked for that reason.
And for reasons related to the Liberal worldview.


Care to provide a cogent post on the actual OP, not the one in your imagination?


Dare ya'.
 
Do you get paid by the entire post or by the word?

Too bad you don't get paid to read or you might have come up with a real comment instead of another lame troll post.

It's all about giving families a choice regarding their child's school. The public schools are letting them down and the Walton family is responsible for families having other options.

Why are liberals again vouchers that offer options? Do they not think that parents are capable of making such big decisions when it comes to their child's education?

Do you actually have an opinion or are you just here to spout talking points and move on?
 
Shocker! A Liberal Attack On Success

The shocker, is a con trying to CONvince us that only cons are successful, when in reality, it's an attack on the rigging of the system in favor of greedy slime balls which is the base of the GOP.



1. Don't be afraid to stand on your own...there's no "us."

.

Since more than one person is reading and/or participating in this thread, the proper term, of course, is 'us'.
 
Do you get paid by the entire post or by the word?

Too bad you don't get paid to read or you might have come up with a real comment instead of another lame troll post.

It's all about giving families a choice regarding their child's school. The public schools are letting them down and the Walton family is responsible for families having other options.

Why are liberals again vouchers that offer options? Do they not think that parents are capable of making such big decisions when it comes to their child's education?

Do you actually have an opinion or are you just here to spout talking points and move on?
....by the word.
 
Easy.


Look at the results of the policies this wind-bag has instituted:



1. "Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession
. ...the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey ....indicate that the real (inflation-adjusted) median annual household income in America has fallen by 4.4 percent during the "recovery," after having fallen by 1.8 during the recession.
Incomes Have Dropped Twice as Much During the 'Recovery' as During the Recession | The Weekly Standard


2. ... in today’s recovery — the slowest in the modern era going back to 1947 — private capital investment has lagged badly. ... so has the jobs situation, with 92 million dropping out of the workforce altogether. A labor-participation rate of 62.8% and an employment-to-population rate of 58% are historic lows indicative of the anemic jobs recovery. Big Business Swings Behind a Mantra of Growth - The New York Sun


Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
Matthew 7:20





In Frazer's "The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion," he explains how primitive societies relied on their leader to intermediate with the gods, and obtain good weather, etc.
(The book served as an important cornerstone of "Apocalypse, Now.")


In modern society an astute voter expects the elected leader to be competent, to have effective policies to better the nation.

Clearly, Obama votes are hardly astute voters.
Raise your paw.

All you've done is confirmed the long term effect of the de-industrialization of America.





See what I mean about you Liberals lying every chance you get?

If you want to debate that America has not been de-industrialized over the past 30 years and lost large numbers of good paying jobs as a consequence by all means let's have it.
 
You need to be arguing with PoliticalChic, not me. She's the one saying that all the people trying to get jobs at Walmart is why the country is doing so well.

She's praising the so-called Obama economy.




Wow...another shocker: a Liberal lying.

If you are going to be two faced, at least make one of them pretty.

Do you deny, outright, citing the demand for Walmart jobs as a GOOD thing?

Please do.

Excellent. You won't deny it. Therefore you look quite foolish flip flopping from that to claiming that low wage jobs are a BAD thing and Obama is to blame.
 
All you've done is confirmed the long term effect of the de-industrialization of America.





See what I mean about you Liberals lying every chance you get?

If you want to debate that America has not been de-industrialized over the past 30 years and lost large numbers of good paying jobs as a consequence by all means let's have it.




You elected an unaccomplished wind-bag who has not only not improved the economy...or the world for that matter.....in almost six years.....but has made everything worse.


I don't blame him, his personal aggrandizement is a human trait....

..you and those other idiots who saddled this nation with an incompetent Leftist....is that redundant?....are the ones who should be punished.



We on the Right warned you about him at the start.
 

Forum List

Back
Top