- Thread starter
- #241
In my experience there are few or no "left wingers" who post on the USMB. The word leftist and term left winger are used as pejoratives to describe anyone who doesn't support the dogma most self described 'conservatives' hold dear.
If one supports gun control, equal rights for all citizens, Roe v. Wade, opposes tax schemes to further enrich the wealthy, campaign finance reform, the PPACA and government agencies which protect the food we eat, the water we drink, the air we breath, the drugs we take they must be a communist, socialist, Marxist, statist monster.
Look at the new posts on any day, generally there is at least one posted by one of the local racists, one by a constitutional 'scholar', one from the Ministry of Truth rewriting history and several parroting the latest "Breaking News" broadcast that day on the Conspiracy Channel = Fox News. None of which are substantive and many are irrational rants by fools and liars.
"I can’t prove you are a Communist. But when I see a bird that quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, has feathers and webbed feet and associates with ducks—I’m certainly going to assume that he is a duck."
Sentinel, John (September 29, 1946). "Communist Expose The Case of the Duck". Milwaukee (WI) Sentinel.
Did you just quack?
A fowl ad hominem, classic PC.
You did note that I didn't leave you out; I do know how to appeal to narcissists. For those not in the know, PC works for the Ministry of Truth, she spends her days researching little know authors who have a unique perspective on history, one which starts with the conclusion and works backward to support their claim.
Iconoclasts they are not, they, like PC, are desperate for attention. They can be forgiven, for they work for money; PC, as do all parrots, works for crackers (the praise of those USMB members who are crackers).
1. "....authors who have a unique perspective on history, one which starts with the conclusion and works backward to support their claim."
Which hardly explains why you are never able to find any errors in what I offer.
After all, I construct flawless OPs which lead to undeniable conclusions....if I don't say so myself.
And, being objective, of course I am correct.
2. "... narcissists."
Since we both bring up this....'attitude'....
...let me offer an explanation, if not a perspective.
To a degree, you add to my narcissism, for the following reason.
Instead of Snow White, imagine Goliath living with the Seven Dwarfs.
How could he possibly not see himself through a similar prism?
Surrounded by you, and other intellectual dwarfs, how could I not see myself as head and shoulders above?
I mean, seriously.
Do you now understand your responsibility for said outcome?
But I did like the 'fowl' thing....see, you're learning.
You should be bringing me an apple.
Last edited: