Should Army National Guard Troops Shoot Illegal Border Crossers ?

[Conservative65]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

 

[danielpalos]

one resorts to capitalism and the other to the socialism of Government.

Why can't you have secure border's and capitalism.
It's not an either or.
If you don't have secured borders you don't have a country.

Capitalism failed in 1929 and Socialism has been bailing out Capitalism, ever since. No more right wing propaganda about allegedly free markets.

And, we have secure borders; we don't have market friendly public policies to eliminate any incentive to be illegal in our Republic.

Credit and the ticket market machines was the failure in 29.
Socialism is failing.
We do not have secure boarders when we have millions of illegals.

and no capital solutions only Government solutions? why allege to be for Capitalism instead of Socialism.

Forbes explains it better than I can.
European Socialism: Why America Doesn't Want It

why socialism on the border instead of capitalism?

 

[danielpalos]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

 

[Conservative65]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

 

[danielpalos]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

 

[Conservative65]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

 

[Faun]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

 

[Conservative65]

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

The cost of a single bullet has more monetary value than the miserable life of any illegal.

 

[Faun]

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

Let Democrat voters do what?

 

[Conservative65]

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

Let Democrat voters do what?

It's easy to see why your kind supports those pieces of shit lying about why they're coming.

 

[Faun]

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

Let Democrat voters do what?

It's easy to see why your kind supports those pieces of shit lying about why they're coming.

Why not answer the question? Let Democrats do what?

 

[LuckyDuck]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

Troops actions are limited; they can try to restrict access, detain and turn over to border patrol personnel, but that's about it. If I were a dictator, I wouldn't waste large amounts of troops on the border, but rather, have the border heavily land-mined, with a few back-up troops. After the invading horde lost a few to land-mines, they would turn back; those that didn't turn back could be dissuaded with other forms of violence.

 

[Conservative65]

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

Let Democrat voters do what?

It's easy to see why your kind supports those pieces of shit lying about why they're coming.

Why not answer the question? Let Democrats do what?

Meaningless question from a meaningless, worthless, illegal loving, piece of shit like you. Just like a I don't pretend illegals have any value, I don't pretend your questions are worth answering.

Seems you haven't figured out that you're inferior to me.

 

[Faun]

G’head, shoot ‘em. Just please do it before the election.

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

Let Democrat voters do what?

It's easy to see why your kind supports those pieces of shit lying about why they're coming.

Why not answer the question? Let Democrats do what?

Meaningless question from a meaningless, worthless, illegal loving, piece of shit like you. Just like a I don't pretend illegals have any value, I don't pretend your questions are worth answering.

Seems you haven't figured out that you're inferior to me.

LOLOL

You’re a moron. Like you, I was saying shoot them. And how can I be inferior to you? I don’t even know who you are.

 

[KissMy]

if needed to repel an invasion

central America said that in the latest caravan

headed this way they caught 100 ISIS members

 

[Conservative65]

Let Democrat voters.

Sad how you support illegals being treated like they have any value.

Let Democrat voters do what?

It's easy to see why your kind supports those pieces of shit lying about why they're coming.

Why not answer the question? Let Democrats do what?

Meaningless question from a meaningless, worthless, illegal loving, piece of shit like you. Just like a I don't pretend illegals have any value, I don't pretend your questions are worth answering.

Seems you haven't figured out that you're inferior to me.

LOLOL

You’re a moron. Like you, I was saying shoot them. And how can I be inferior to you? I don’t even know who you are.

We don't have to know each other for me to recognize that you're inferior.

 

[Faun]

Let Democrat voters do what?

It's easy to see why your kind supports those pieces of shit lying about why they're coming.

Why not answer the question? Let Democrats do what?

Meaningless question from a meaningless, worthless, illegal loving, piece of shit like you. Just like a I don't pretend illegals have any value, I don't pretend your questions are worth answering.

Seems you haven't figured out that you're inferior to me.

LOLOL

You’re a moron. Like you, I was saying shoot them. And how can I be inferior to you? I don’t even know who you are.

We don't have to know each other for me to recognize that you're inferior.

LOLOL

I posted the same thing you did. Your hallucinations are noted, laughed at and dismissed.

 

[there4eyeM]

All who are here calling for shooting instead of being at the border are simply cowards.

 

[danielpalos]

When I served in the Army National Guard, I was told the first duty of the Army National Guard is to do what the name "National Guard" clearly states > to guard the nation. And the first priority of that is to stop foreigners from invading the USA.

And the definition of invading

? > "to enter forcibly or hostilely" (Webster's New World College Dictionary, 5th ed.) Well, the caravaners already entered Mexico, from Guatemala, forcibly, and one could call it hostilely, being that it's disrespecting Mexico's immigration and border law. In doing so, the border crossers tore down fences and physical barriers.

There's no doubt that the thousands of people in this caravan have exactly that same thing in mind for the United States. The solution to stop them, according to my National Guard officers is to meet the force with greater force, and use whatever force is necessary to stop and repel the invaders.

Since an effective border wall is not yet in place or electrified fencing, barbed wire, etc, this would mean possibly shooting hundreds of the caravaners, gassing them at the border, or possibly even using artillery. The military has its job to do, the question is can (and should) we allow Honduras, Guatemala and other countries to invade us ?​

They're invaders and should be dealt with as invaders. They're no different than someone in a home invasion and should be dealt with in the same manner.

no, they aren't. they are Persons. We should insist capitalists solve capital problems before they become Government problems.

Not my fault you're too stupid to understand a simple definition. Are you one of those below average , 85 IQ blacks?

there is no invasion. a multitude is not an invasion.

where is the call for Invasion Tax Rates to prove the Right Wing is not merely frivolous with the Other Peoples' tax money and not merely indulging "chicken little-ism".

Their actions make it an invasion. Has nothing to do with the number.

I have no problem helping fund the bullets that go to fulfill the responsibility of repelling invaders.

you can't be serious with tax cut economics; why waste everyone's time.

 

[Billo_Really]

------------------------------------------- i think that the TRUMP specified 'ms13' and other gang members , As far as asylum , i think to qualify you need to claim protection from your Government and not one of your babee Daddies or 'johns' who has been beating you up [guess that that'd be 'juans' ] Billo

I don't have a clue as to what you are talking about.