Should Casebolt Have Shot the Kids who Charged At Him ?

[orogenicman]

Had he done as you suggest, he would be up for murder, or dead, as the other two policemen that restrained him would probably have shot him.

No, he would have been confirmed by the 21 foot rule, and if the other officers shot him, THEY would have been arrested for murder. You talk as if the 21 foot rule didn't exist. IT DOES (and has since 1988)

It only applies to armed suspects.

Revisiting the 21-Foot Rule - Article - POLICE Magazine

Neither of those boys were armed.

Yes. The 21 foot rule typically is for weapons. Particularly knives.

But sometimes its for "unarmed" people. If 3 people charge me...well...I cant win a hand to hand fight vs three men. So...if they get to me...my life is in danger.

If the attacker is Brock Lesnar or a former SEAL...and unarmed. ..id lose that fight too. Life is in danger.

2 unknown males swarming me as I made an arrest? Maybe. With ample backup there id say dont shoot. But...thats from our view on a couch. Casebolt didnt see what was behind him...or if they had weapons. Or may want his weapon.

It was all unknown.

Drawing the gun? Im 100% ok with that.
The two males immediately ran though....so absolutely not a good shoot. And he didnt shoot...so again....not sure what all the outrag is over.

You cannot convince me that this guy pulling his gun on two unarmed teenagers who were backing away from him - in the middle of an area where dozens of kids were standing by, and when other police officers were also present, was an appropriate thing to do. The police chief said flat out that they officer was out of control, that his actions were counter to department policy. If he has fired that weapon, the chances were very high that he would have struck, and likely killed an innocent child. As it was, he was already in the process of assaulting a young girl. For anyone to justify this man's actions is just as outrageous as his actions.

Yes...the two males who swarmed him did back away...BECAUSE he drew a gun. What if he stays there and keeps trying to detain the girl? Do they assault him? Swarm him? We dont kmow. He didnt give them a chance.

He had no business assaulting the girl in the first place. If I had seen a police officer do that to a 14 year old girl, I might have confronted him as well.

 

[bucs90]

No, he would have been confirmed by the 21 foot rule, and if the other officers shot him, THEY would have been arrested for murder. You talk as if the 21 foot rule didn't exist. IT DOES (and has since 1988)

It only applies to armed suspects.

Revisiting the 21-Foot Rule - Article - POLICE Magazine

Neither of those boys were armed.

Yes. The 21 foot rule typically is for weapons. Particularly knives.

But sometimes its for "unarmed" people. If 3 people charge me...well...I cant win a hand to hand fight vs three men. So...if they get to me...my life is in danger.

If the attacker is Brock Lesnar or a former SEAL...and unarmed. ..id lose that fight too. Life is in danger.

2 unknown males swarming me as I made an arrest? Maybe. With ample backup there id say dont shoot. But...thats from our view on a couch. Casebolt didnt see what was behind him...or if they had weapons. Or may want his weapon.

It was all unknown.

Drawing the gun? Im 100% ok with that.
The two males immediately ran though....so absolutely not a good shoot. And he didnt shoot...so again....not sure what all the outrag is over.

You cannot convince me that this guy pulling his gun on two unarmed teenagers who were backing away from him - in the middle of an area where dozens of kids were standing by, and when other police officers were also present, was an appropriate thing to do. The police chief said flat out that they officer was out of control, that his actions were counter to department policy. If he has fired that weapon, the chances were very high that he would have struck, and likely killed an innocent child. As it was, he was already in the process of assaulting a young girl. For anyone to justify this man's actions is just as outrageous as his actions.

Yes...the two males who swarmed him did back away...BECAUSE he drew a gun. What if he stays there and keeps trying to detain the girl? Do they assault him? Swarm him? We dont kmow. He didnt give them a chance.

He had no business assaulting the girl in the first place. If I had seen a police officer do that to a 14 year old girl, I might have confronted him as well.

"Assaulting"? He was detaining a trespasser who aas uncooperative. Not assaulting anyone.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

No, he would have been confirmed by the 21 foot rule, and if the other officers shot him, THEY would have been arrested for murder. You talk as if the 21 foot rule didn't exist. IT DOES (and has since 1988)

It only applies to armed suspects.

Revisiting the 21-Foot Rule - Article - POLICE Magazine

Neither of those boys were armed.

Yes. The 21 foot rule typically is for weapons. Particularly knives.

But sometimes its for "unarmed" people. If 3 people charge me...well...I cant win a hand to hand fight vs three men. So...if they get to me...my life is in danger.

If the attacker is Brock Lesnar or a former SEAL...and unarmed. ..id lose that fight too. Life is in danger.

2 unknown males swarming me as I made an arrest? Maybe. With ample backup there id say dont shoot. But...thats from our view on a couch. Casebolt didnt see what was behind him...or if they had weapons. Or may want his weapon.

It was all unknown.

Drawing the gun? Im 100% ok with that.
The two males immediately ran though....so absolutely not a good shoot. And he didnt shoot...so again....not sure what all the outrag is over.

You cannot convince me that this guy pulling his gun on two unarmed teenagers who were backing away from him - in the middle of an area where dozens of kids were standing by, and when other police officers were also present, was an appropriate thing to do. The police chief said flat out that they officer was out of control, that his actions were counter to department policy. If he has fired that weapon, the chances were very high that he would have struck, and likely killed an innocent child. As it was, he was already in the process of assaulting a young girl. For anyone to justify this man's actions is just as outrageous as his actions.

Well you are an idiot libtard so you wouldn't know the truth anyway. I saw the video, the officer was completely justified.

And that is why people like you are part of the problem in this country.

Longtime McKinney Officer Blasts Police Conduct At Pool Party Says Department Has A Race Problem ThinkProgress

Pete Schutle, a former McKinney police officer and “longtime reserve deputy,” spoke to Fox4 Dallas and blasted the conduct of Eric Casebolt, the police corporal shown slamming a 15-year-old girl in a swimsuit to the ground.

“I don’t care what she was yelling at that officer. Anything would not have justified throwing her to the ground and pushing her down and throwing her face into the concrete like he did,” Schutle said.

Schulte also said there was no reason for Casebolt to have drawn his weapon and described Casebolt’s reaction to the situation as “crazy.”

According to Schulte, the video indicates that the McKinney police had a race problem. “There is an indication based on watching the video that the white people who were around the officers weren’t talked to, they weren’t pushed away, they weren’t told to get on the ground, they weren’t put in handcuffs. The only individuals McKinney police were doing that to were those that were African-American,” he said.

People like you are the problem in this country.

 

[orogenicman]

It only applies to armed suspects.

Revisiting the 21-Foot Rule - Article - POLICE Magazine

Neither of those boys were armed.

Yes. The 21 foot rule typically is for weapons. Particularly knives.

But sometimes its for "unarmed" people. If 3 people charge me...well...I cant win a hand to hand fight vs three men. So...if they get to me...my life is in danger.

If the attacker is Brock Lesnar or a former SEAL...and unarmed. ..id lose that fight too. Life is in danger.

2 unknown males swarming me as I made an arrest? Maybe. With ample backup there id say dont shoot. But...thats from our view on a couch. Casebolt didnt see what was behind him...or if they had weapons. Or may want his weapon.

It was all unknown.

Drawing the gun? Im 100% ok with that.
The two males immediately ran though....so absolutely not a good shoot. And he didnt shoot...so again....not sure what all the outrag is over.

You cannot convince me that this guy pulling his gun on two unarmed teenagers who were backing away from him - in the middle of an area where dozens of kids were standing by, and when other police officers were also present, was an appropriate thing to do. The police chief said flat out that they officer was out of control, that his actions were counter to department policy. If he has fired that weapon, the chances were very high that he would have struck, and likely killed an innocent child. As it was, he was already in the process of assaulting a young girl. For anyone to justify this man's actions is just as outrageous as his actions.

Yes...the two males who swarmed him did back away...BECAUSE he drew a gun. What if he stays there and keeps trying to detain the girl? Do they assault him? Swarm him? We dont kmow. He didnt give them a chance.

He had no business assaulting the girl in the first place. If I had seen a police officer do that to a 14 year old girl, I might have confronted him as well.

"Assaulting"? He was detaining a trespasser who aas uncooperative. Not assaulting anyone.

She was walking away after he told her to leave. She might have said something he didn't like but that did not justify him throwing her to the ground and then shoving her face in the dirt. She was a fucking child for Pet's sake. And if she did say something to him, So what? Did you hear the language he was spewing at these kids during that entire video? Several kids even asked him to stop cursing at them. So what the hell did he expect?

 

[Camp]

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

 

[orogenicman]

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

The officer was crouched down assaulting a 14 year old girl in a bathing suit when they approached him from the side. If they had approached him from behind while he was in that position, he would have been unable to even see that they were there. Stop justifying the unjustifiable.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

The officer was crouched down assaulting a 14 year old girl in a bathing suit when they approached him from the side. If they had approached him from behind while he was in that position, he would have been unable to even see that they were there. Stop justifying the unjustifiable.

He wasn't assaulting Her, he was trying to restrain her. Idiot libtard. Stop protecting thugs.

 

[Camp]

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

You sound like a dick wad racist. Are you a dick wad racist? Are you using the word thug because you don't have the balls to use another word?

 

[orogenicman]

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

The officer was crouched down assaulting a 14 year old girl in a bathing suit when they approached him from the side. If they had approached him from behind while he was in that position, he would have been unable to even see that they were there. Stop justifying the unjustifiable.

He wasn't assaulting Her, he was trying to restrain her. Idiot libtard. Stop protecting thugs.

He had no cause to "restrain" this 14 year old girl. She did nothing to him, was not threatening him or anyone else, and was, in fact, leaving the scene as he directed when he came up behind her and threw her to the pavement face first. In fact, during that entire video, you cannot see where she did anything to justify his actions towards her. And you are wrong to call that violent throw down of a child "restraint". It was purely and simply an assault on a child. He violated her civil rights, and violated department policy. During that entire video he was cursing these kids, screaming at them, and talking in a very disrespectful manner. He did not do behave this way towards any white children who were there, and their certainly were plenty white children running around at the scene.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

The officer was crouched down assaulting a 14 year old girl in a bathing suit when they approached him from the side. If they had approached him from behind while he was in that position, he would have been unable to even see that they were there. Stop justifying the unjustifiable.

He wasn't assaulting Her, he was trying to restrain her. Idiot libtard. Stop protecting thugs.

He had no cause to "restrain" this 14 year old girl. She did nothing to him, was not threatening him or anyone else, and was, in fact, leaving the scene as he directed when he came up behind her and threw her to the pavement face first. In fact, during that entire video, you cannot see where she did anything to justify his actions towards her. And you are wrong to call that violent throw down of a child "restraint". It was purely and simply an assault on a child. He violated her civil rights, and violated department policy. During that entire video he was cursing these kids, screaming at them, and talking in a very disrespectful manner. He did not do behave this way towards any white children who were there, and their certainly were plenty white children running around at the scene.

The white kids weren't running back and forth mouthing off. That girl he restrained was in and out of the scene, instead of leaving she kept coming back running her mouth.

 

[orogenicman]

Texas pool brawl When cops fight the law the law must win - LA Times

Let's review what unfolded in McKinney.

A resident with access to the community's private pool threw a party with loud music and invited more people than were allowed under the rules of the local homeowners association. The loudness of the music and the size of the party were violations of the HOA agreement, but because the party-goers were guests of someone with legitimate legal access to the property, they were not trespassing. The only "law-breaking' apparently was a violation of a contract, specifically a violation of the HOA agreement on pool usage. HOA disputes are notoriously testy but are usually safely arbitrated between community members without police involvement.

Witnesses, both black and white, say the cops were called after some white residents started shouting racial slurs at the African American party-goers, leading to an argument. The officers' arrival was not welcomed -- and was greeted with rude remarks -- in part because cops are rarely welcome at parties (as any frat boy can tell you), but more significantly because the party-goers had not committed any crime and had already been called racial slurs.

No one envies the cop for having to deal with this situation, and situations such as this one are among the reasons why being a cop is one of the toughest jobs in America, a job that deserves to be compensated generously when done well.

But here's the important thing: telling a cop to " ... off" is not illegal. Even getting in the officer's face and saying " ... off" is not illegal. It's protected speech under the 1st Amendment. The rules of military engagement do not apply.

The 1st Amendment, including its allowances for people to talk back to police, exists because sometimes authority figures throw their weight around when no crime is being committed. Authority cannot be used without the mandate of law, and if it is, it's tyranny.

Casebolt's escalation of the situation was, at the least, unprofessional, but by detaining people without reasonable suspicion that they had committed a crime, he broke the law. By throwing someone around who was exercising her 1st Amendment rights, he broke the law. And when an officer of the law breaks the law, it undercuts other law enforcement officers who are trying to do the right thing.

Because police forces are so essential to a free society, and because in a democracy their use of force is explicitly a reflection of the will of the people, that use of force must be held to a high standard. And if an officer uses force in contradiction of the law, it is a violation of the trust society has placed in him.

This analysis may sound abstract, at least in part, because it’s easy to say these things when working in a violence-free profession. But it’s also important to remember that even with a few high-profile, tragic incidents, research shows that being an American police officer, while stressful, is less dangerous than being a garbage collector. It isn’t a war zone out on America’s streets, contrary to what we see in TV shows and movies. In fact, in 2013 more officers died in traffic accidents than because of gunfireor other violence.

When a police officer violates the law and punishes people who have not broken the law themselves, it undermines police everywhere -- and, in so doing, undermines one of the foundations of society. It's an affront to the people whose rights were unduly violated, to law-abiding law enforcement officers, and to the society itself. If we truly care about law and order, then, we must make sure that incidents such as what we saw in McKinney simply do not happen in America, anywhere.

To do otherwise would be indefensible.

 

[orogenicman]

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

The officer was crouched down assaulting a 14 year old girl in a bathing suit when they approached him from the side. If they had approached him from behind while he was in that position, he would have been unable to even see that they were there. Stop justifying the unjustifiable.

He wasn't assaulting Her, he was trying to restrain her. Idiot libtard. Stop protecting thugs.

He had no cause to "restrain" this 14 year old girl. She did nothing to him, was not threatening him or anyone else, and was, in fact, leaving the scene as he directed when he came up behind her and threw her to the pavement face first. In fact, during that entire video, you cannot see where she did anything to justify his actions towards her. And you are wrong to call that violent throw down of a child "restraint". It was purely and simply an assault on a child. He violated her civil rights, and violated department policy. During that entire video he was cursing these kids, screaming at them, and talking in a very disrespectful manner. He did not do behave this way towards any white children who were there, and their certainly were plenty white children running around at the scene.

The white kids weren't running back and forth mouthing off. That girl he restrained was in and out of the scene, instead of leaving she kept coming back running her mouth.

Yes they were. Go back and view the video.

 

[Vandalshandle]

The girl, (who was actually 15) was a clear and present danger. She could have taken off her bikini top, and used it to strangle the police officer. She might had had one of those hidden gun gadgets that James Bond always seems to have, tucked away in her bikini bottom.

 

[JQPublic1]

Hmm your a troll. Besides he did not pull the gun until the kids were running away. Yeah shoot them in the back. Besides they were kids and any decent person would had done the same if someone in uniform or not was manhandling a 14 year old girl. In fact the disgusting cop went back and attacked the girl when she was just sitting there. Assault of a minor. I guess in your world you want kids shot and girls forced into submission for no reason, because there was no reason for it. Go donate to this bully cop, or hire him since you seem to be in love with him. Like it or not police are ambassitors of the state and are in the public eye, they are to be held to the highest standards because they have so much power, if they cannot handle it like casebolt they have no business being a policeman. When one screws up they all look bad. It is this way everywhere, and need to mend fences. They need to adopt military type evaluations, meaning they need to volunteer and work their off time with the communities and schools and habitat for humanity, and be evaluated ever quarter, if they do not they should be demoted. They need to get out in the communities and work with people. The military does this. If you do not volunteer time and effort in the community you get poor ratings which make it impossible to be promoted. Protect and serve. if you don't like it don't be a cop. Only responsible people need apply.

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

I saw the video idiot, they came up behind him

Read my post #8, boo boo.

Yeah. That was REFUTED in Post # 10, and before that, in the OP. (doo doo)

You've gotten enough information from me, and the video, and the links about the 21 FOOT rule, to cure you of your media induced mental paralysis. You don't need any more help from me.

I'm off the computer now

1. I'll let your dumb ass slide THIS TIME. If you call me a troll again, I'll report you.

2. Obviously, he was pulling his gun as he saw them approaching. You're either an idiot, or a baldfaced liar.

3. Doesn't matter if they were kids. The guy that looked like he was reaching into his back pocket for a weapon is 18 years old. Thousands of people (including cops) have been killed by 18 year olds.

4. The 14 or 15 year old girl was resisting arrest. She is supposed to be manhandled under that situation.

5. You don't know what reason there was for Casebolt to apprehend the girl. Where they first come in contact with each other isn't shown on the video. She must have committed a crime. So don't talk about what you don't know.

6. I already sent a email to the McKinney police that we would like to have Casebolt come here to Tampa to be on our police force.

7. Casebolt did not "screw up" Your perception (influenced by the biased media) is what is screwed up.

8. Police are ALREADY out in the communities, and working with people more than you know anything about.

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

Those so called charging thugs were not charging at all when Jackass cop pulled his weapon. The vid clearly shows them backing off and moving away from Jackass as soon as he reaches for his weapon. By the time he pulls leather the suspects are beginning to turn and run. If Jackass cop had shot one of those guys he would be facing murder charges.

those thugs only ran when the good cop pulled his gun. Libtards=thug lovers.

The officer was crouched down assaulting a 14 year old girl in a bathing suit when they approached him from the side. If they had approached him from behind while he was in that position, he would have been unable to even see that they were there. Stop justifying the unjustifiable.

He wasn't assaulting Her, he was trying to restrain her. Idiot libtard. Stop protecting thugs.

It only applies to armed suspects.

Revisiting the 21-Foot Rule - Article - POLICE Magazine

Neither of those boys were armed.

Yes. The 21 foot rule typically is for weapons. Particularly knives.

But sometimes its for "unarmed" people. If 3 people charge me...well...I cant win a hand to hand fight vs three men. So...if they get to me...my life is in danger.

If the attacker is Brock Lesnar or a former SEAL...and unarmed. ..id lose that fight too. Life is in danger.

2 unknown males swarming me as I made an arrest? Maybe. With ample backup there id say dont shoot. But...thats from our view on a couch. Casebolt didnt see what was behind him...or if they had weapons. Or may want his weapon.

It was all unknown.

Drawing the gun? Im 100% ok with that.
The two males immediately ran though....so absolutely not a good shoot. And he didnt shoot...so again....not sure what all the outrag is over.

You cannot convince me that this guy pulling his gun on two unarmed teenagers who were backing away from him - in the middle of an area where dozens of kids were standing by, and when other police officers were also present, was an appropriate thing to do. The police chief said flat out that they officer was out of control, that his actions were counter to department policy. If he has fired that weapon, the chances were very high that he would have struck, and likely killed an innocent child. As it was, he was already in the process of assaulting a young girl. For anyone to justify this man's actions is just as outrageous as his actions.

Yes...the two males who swarmed him did back away...BECAUSE he drew a gun. What if he stays there and keeps trying to detain the girl? Do they assault him? Swarm him? We dont kmow. He didnt give them a chance.

He had no business assaulting the girl in the first place. If I had seen a police officer do that to a 14 year old girl, I might have confronted him as well.

"Assaulting"? He was detaining a trespasser who aas uncooperative. Not assaulting anyone.

The girl was not a trespasser. BTW,how would Casebolt have known the difference?

Obviously,he assumed she was a trespasser.....because? Let's see if you can guess?

 

[protectionist]

It only applies to armed suspects.

Revisiting the 21-Foot Rule - Article - POLICE Magazine

Neither of those boys were armed.

ANYONE attacking toward you is considered armed. You have no way of knowing if someone is carrying a knife which can be pulled in a FRACTION OF A SECOND, or if the attacker might seize your own gun. You have to be told this TWICE ?Read the OP.

Yep.

If 6'3 260 pound former UFC heavyweight champion Brock Lesnar attacked a 5'9 160 pound cop....would that cop be justified shooting that "unarmed" man? Absolutely.

Of course his size (and fighting expertise) is his weapon. In reality , nobody is ever unarmed. You could be wearing steel tipped shoes, carry a ball point pen, be wearing a belt, have shoelaces, have a golf ball in your pocket, a cigarette lighter - all are weapons.(as are the hands, which can wrest a gun away from the person being attacked)

 

[protectionist]

The girl was not a trespasser. BTW,how would Casebolt have known the difference?

Obviously,he assumed she was a trespasser.....because? Let's see if you can guess?

"Obviously,he assumed she was a trespasser" ??? That's one of the more odd things I've hear the last few days in the McKinney issue. Well, it's not obvious to me, nor do I even see ANY reason to think that at all. So OK. I give up. How is it obvious that he assumed she was a trespasser ? No, I can't guess. Not at all.

 

[protectionist]

The girl, (who was actually 15) was a clear and present danger. She could have taken off her bikini top, and used it to strangle the police officer. She might had had one of those hidden gun gadgets that James Bond always seems to have, tucked away in her bikini bottom.

But you don't know if the girl WAS a danger or not, or if she had committed a crime or not, right ? So why are you joking about this. You don't know any more than the rest of us.

 

[protectionist]

Ok since we're talking about unknowns, you do not know that she did commit a crime but assume she did, as you said she must had committed a crime. Second in earlier posts you said they came up behind him which they never did. But you and even hannity on fox said they came up behind him... That was a lie.report me dude because you are a troll and I will give you the benefit of the doubt and say you can't possible believe the crap that your saying. No one could be that stupid. Hence you must be a troll trying to get a reaction. Lol

1. I don't recall saying they came up behind him. Where did you see that ?

2. I'm guessing she probably did do something to cause Casebolt to arrest her. I couldn't see it on the video, nor could all the people who mindlessly say she did nothing wrong, which they don't know.

3. You're reported.

4. So when someone disagrees with you , you call him a troll. You;re an idiot, and you haven't once said anything about the primary subject of the thread (the 21 foot rule). And all yuo rfancy explanation for calling me a troll, doesn't even begin to fly.
, You don't think anything about what I'm doing - you just want to fling the word "TROLL' around, and you shouldn't get away with that.
,

 

[protectionist]

You cannot convince me that this guy pulling his gun on two unarmed teenagers who were backing away from him - in the middle of an area where dozens of kids were standing by, and when other police officers were also present, was an appropriate thing to do. The police chief said flat out that they officer was out of control, that his actions were counter to department policy. If he has fired that weapon, the chances were very high that he would have struck, and likely killed an innocent child. As it was, he was already in the process of assaulting a young girl. For anyone to justify this man's actions is just as outrageous as his actions.

1. Unarmed is irrelevant. If you're attacked that's enough to warrant self-defense witha gun - for a cop or civilian. And as i said before, no one is ever unarmed.

2. Don't me that backing away crap. When Casebolt first caught sight of these 2 numbskulls, they were approaching , and that's when his draw began. As the video described there is a lag time of about a second or two between first recognition of attack, and when the gun comes out of the holster.

3. Whether you are convinced of anything is irrelevant. The gun draw was appropriate. See the pictures in Post # 21.

4. The police chief is the MOST IRRELEVANT part of this whole thing.

5 The child, as you call him was not "innocent".. He was charging straight at a police officer in the performance of his duty.

6. He was not assaulting anyone. He is authorized to subdue the girl, who was engaging in a criminal act of resisting arrest.

7. For anyone to condemn this man for just doing his job is either outrageous dishonesty, or idiocy.