Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
No, you're ignorant of the facts and the law.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
No, you're ignorant of the facts and the law.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
Public accommodations laws apply solely to goods and services offered to the general public in the normal course of doing business.
If a baker doesn't sell wedding cakes he cannot be compelled to sell one to a same-sex couple.
If a baker sells wedding cakes to the general public in the normal course of business he may not refuse to accommodate a patron because that patron is gay, if the law in his jurisdiction affords protections to gay customers.
Public accommodations laws are necessary, proper, and Constitutional, authorized by Commerce Clause jurisprudence.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
A gay couple in Oregon demanded a special cake and were denied. They sued and won.
Oregon ruling really takes the cake -- Christian bakery guilty of violating civil rights of lesbian couple Fox News
No, you're ignorant of the facts and the law.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
Public accommodations laws apply solely to goods and services offered to the general public in the normal course of doing business.
If a baker doesn't sell wedding cakes he cannot be compelled to sell one to a same-sex couple.
If a baker sells wedding cakes to the general public in the normal course of business he may not refuse to accommodate a patron because that patron is gay, if the law in his jurisdiction affords protections to gay customers.
Public accommodations laws are necessary, proper, and Constitutional, authorized by Commerce Clause jurisprudence.
We're gonna change the law.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
A gay couple in Oregon demanded a special cake and were denied. They sued and won.
Oregon ruling really takes the cake -- Christian bakery guilty of violating civil rights of lesbian couple Fox News
No liar, they ordered a wedding cake. It wasn't "special", it was a wedding cake, just like the wedding cakes they baked all the time.
No, you're ignorant of the facts and the law.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
Public accommodations laws apply solely to goods and services offered to the general public in the normal course of doing business.
If a baker doesn't sell wedding cakes he cannot be compelled to sell one to a same-sex couple.
If a baker sells wedding cakes to the general public in the normal course of business he may not refuse to accommodate a patron because that patron is gay, if the law in his jurisdiction affords protections to gay customers.
Public accommodations laws are necessary, proper, and Constitutional, authorized by Commerce Clause jurisprudence.
We're gonna change the law.
Oh? Which law are "we" going to change? All Public Accommodation laws or just the gay ones?
What you're dealing with there is, quite simply, old fashion evil. It's a lie designed for no other purpose than to produce chaos, calamity and catastrophe.
Want some drugs little "waif"?...
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
A gay couple in Oregon demanded a special cake and were denied. They sued and won.
Oregon ruling really takes the cake -- Christian bakery guilty of violating civil rights of lesbian couple Fox News
No liar, they ordered a wedding cake. It wasn't "special", it was a wedding cake, just like the wedding cakes they baked all the time.
They had cakes already made they were willing to sell them. Read the article, queer.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
A gay couple in Oregon demanded a special cake and were denied. They sued and won.
Oregon ruling really takes the cake -- Christian bakery guilty of violating civil rights of lesbian couple Fox News
No liar, they ordered a wedding cake. It wasn't "special", it was a wedding cake, just like the wedding cakes they baked all the time.
They had cakes already made they were willing to sell them. Read the article, queer.
They would not sell the couple a wedding cake...that they would sell any other couple. The gay couple did not ask for a product the business did not provide, just one they did not want to provide to THAT couple. Hence the discrimination. If you ask for a product the company does not sell it is not discrimination.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
A gay couple in Oregon demanded a special cake and were denied. They sued and won.
Oregon ruling really takes the cake -- Christian bakery guilty of violating civil rights of lesbian couple Fox News
No liar, they ordered a wedding cake. It wasn't "special", it was a wedding cake, just like the wedding cakes they baked all the time.
They had cakes already made they were willing to sell them. Read the article, queer.
They would not sell the couple a wedding cake...that they would sell any other couple. The gay couple did not ask for a product the business did not provide, just one they did not want to provide to THAT couple. Hence the discrimination. If you ask for a product the company does not sell it is not discrimination.
You're making up shit.
No, I'm countering your ridiculous hyperbole with facts. None of the couples made a special order of the businesses, they simply asked that they provide a service they would provide any other couple. Your bovine feces blogger was making a special order not ordering what the company provides. You can't walk into a Jewish deli and order an un-kosher product if they don't carry it. That's not discrimination.
A gay couple in Oregon demanded a special cake and were denied. They sued and won.
Oregon ruling really takes the cake -- Christian bakery guilty of violating civil rights of lesbian couple Fox News
No liar, they ordered a wedding cake. It wasn't "special", it was a wedding cake, just like the wedding cakes they baked all the time.
They had cakes already made they were willing to sell them. Read the article, queer.
They would not sell the couple a wedding cake...that they would sell any other couple. The gay couple did not ask for a product the business did not provide, just one they did not want to provide to THAT couple. Hence the discrimination. If you ask for a product the company does not sell it is not discrimination.
It was never about "equality". It's about submission.
![/QUOTE]And to their demand for our submission, we, the Americans respond only with our contempt and our unwavering demand that they kiss our ass.
It was never about "equality". It's about submission.
We aren't interested in whether you are a submissive or not.
A special order is completely different than simply being asked to bake a cake out of a catalog. In none of the Public Accommodation cases did the gay couples ask for a service or item not already provided by the business.
You're making up shit.
That's what is known as "relativism"... it is the same perversion of human reasoning which justifies sexual gratification through sexual behavior with their own gender. It's OKA: Delusion.
At one time in this society, we put millions of people just like that in facilities which housed them.
For decades now, they have gone untreated... and the election of a Non-"Natural Born" individual to the Office of the Chief Executive. An individual who has known loyalties to the religion with which the United States is largely at war and whose known background is mired in replete examples of his life long indoctrination in an ideology which is vehemently hostile to American principle... and we're now experiencing the consequences of tolerating insanity, for decades.
And sadly, the delusional have now trained up subsequent generations on their perverse reasoning. It is all their idiot children know... and I am sad to report that because of that, there is little hope that those idiots will ever be capable of rising above the infliction that their worthless parents have saddled upon them.
