Debate Now Should Gay Couples Be Able to Adopt?

[Captain Caveman]

Yes, we know people like you think your personal fetishes and neuroses should be codified into law. So did the founding fathers, which is why they put protections in place.

Do you live in a democracy, and do you know what that means?

Anywhere between direct and representative democracy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Do you live in a democracy, and do you know what that means?

Yes, it means that, if enough people share a fetish or neurosis, they can possibly get it codified into law and force others to soothe their wittle fee fees.

Do you know what it means to have a constitution?

 

[Road Runner]

Here's another topic that I made about this because it's another question that I had. It was sort of on topic but I was afraid that posting it here would start getting too off topic as this thread is about if gay people should adopt, not how they explain how they're their parents in the first place.

How Do Gay Parents Explain How Babies Are Born?

Serious question because picture this; Little five year old Annie or Andrew goes up to his or her two daddies or two mommies and asks them this very question. Obviously they're going to tell them that it takes a mommy and a daddy to make a baby right? So the very next question is going to...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[elektra]

should gay couples be able to adopt, or
should adults be able to do whatever they want, or
should adults force their will on infants

there is no infant, that would naturally choose to have two men, or two women, as parents

All children adopted, eventually wish to know who their real parents are

Gay people, they could give as much love to an infant as anyone else, but gay couples can not give infants what they all want, mom and dad

 

[Captain Caveman]

Yes, it means that, if enough people share a fetish or neurosis, they can possibly get it codified into law and force others to soothe their wittle fee fees.

Do you know what it means to have a constitution?

Then a democracy would allow you vote in a referendum/election to your accordance. And if other Western countries were brave enough to have a more direct democracy system like Switzerland, then the public would enjoy referendums on important issues, such as gay marriage, abortion etc.. And on gay marriage, my vote would be a no.

As for constitutions, yes, America's codified constitution is probably the oldest at 1788 containing 7,762 words. Being the oldest, makes it the most out of date. The UK's constitution is uncodified, so you have to check across multiple documents, laws, publications etc.. Parts of the UK's constitution is not written into law. The origin of the UK's constitution was in 1215, and start your research from the Peace Treaty at Lambeth 1217 if you're interested. The advantage of a constitution not being in one document, is that it's updated and flexible to a changing society.

So for example wit the US, the 2A was deemed adequate hundreds of years ago, it's now dangerously out of date (injury and death statistics indicates the truth in that)

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Gay people, they could give as much love to an infant as anyone else…

Indeed. Look how much “love” William and Zachary Zulock made sure their two adopted boys received.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

As for constitutions, yes, America's codified constitution is probably the oldest at 1788 containing 7,762 words. Being the oldest, makes it the most out of date. The UK's constitution is uncodified, so you have to check across multiple documents, laws, publications etc.. Parts of the UK's constitution is not written into law. The origin of the UK's constitution was in 1215, and start your research from the Peace Treaty at Lambeth 1217 if you're interested. The advantage of a constitution not being in one document, is that it's updated and flexible to a changing society.

So for example wit the US, the 2A was deemed adequate hundreds of years ago, it's now dangerously out of date (injury and death statistics indicates the truth in that)

Perfect demonstration as to why American governance is still none of your fucking business. You're nothing but a pathetic relic of the degenerate tyranny against which we violently rebelled in order to establish our sovereignty and independence as a nation, and to establish basic, essential human rights almost two and a half centuries ago, that your shithole of a nation still refuses to recognize or uphold.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Perfect demonstration as to why American governance is still none of your fucking business. You're nothing but a pathetic relic of the degenerate tyranny against which we violently rebelled in order to establish our sovereignty and independence as a nation, and to establish basic, essential human rights almost two and a half centuries ago, that your shithole of a nation still refuses to recognize or uphold.

Check out my signature for the clichés, you nailed one.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then a democracy would allow you vote in a referendum/election to your accordance.

All for it!. Its the easiest way to squash this right wing fetishism and get the agenda passed that the majority of the people support.

Thanks, see you there!

 

[Frankenstein]

That certainly leaves out cultists.

You mean people with TDS

 

[elektra]

As for constitutions, yes, America's codified constitution is probably the oldest at 1788 containing 7,762 words. Being the oldest, makes it the most out of date.

Hahahaha
Being old does not make the Constitution out of date.

There is no expiration on rights.

In this thread we're talking about the right of heterosexual newborns, infants, children to be raised by as close to what they would freely choose, a heterosexual mom and dad.

Homosexuals give up their right to children by being homosexual.

 

[playtime]

Perfect demonstration as to why American governance is still none of your fucking business.

that would be your support of the bigger more intrusive gov'ment getting all up inside a female's reproductive choices.

 

[Frankenstein]

I did, as did 2 of my pastors, they each adopted two !

No it's true, you can't accept that because it destroys you narrative!

 

[Frankenstein]

Yes, we know people like you think your personal fetishes and neuroses should be codified into law. So did the founding fathers, which is why they put protections in place.

Tis far better than giving children to delusional people with mental illness! What fetish are you speaking of what neuroses

 

[Frankenstein]

that would be your support of the bigger more intrusive gov'ment getting all up inside a female's reproductive choices.

She should have though about that before letting someone else get all up in her reproductive area

 

[Frankenstein]

Yep. A bunch of squids in camo hoodies who clearly think about pedophilia and perversion more than the average gay person does.

Wow, talk about projection!

 

[playtime]

In this thread we're talking about the right of heterosexual newborns, infants, children to be raised by as close to what they would freely choose, a heterosexual mom and dad.

why are there close to 1/2 million children in foster care? no doubt the vast majority ( if not all ) have been 'raised' by their biological incompetent & unworthy parents. you would rather they stay in foster care than be adopted by loving parents who will go thru a stringent investigation & absorb the cost of legal protocols?

what about those homogays that go thru the medical means to have a biological child? should THEY be put into foster care because their parents don't love each other the way you approve?

 

[playtime]

She should have though about that before letting someone else get all up in her reproductive area

or it's none of yer fucking biz'nez, francis.

 

[Frankenstein]

why are there close to 1/2 million children in foster care? no doubt the vast majority ( if not all ) have been 'raised' by their biological incompetent & unworthy parents. you would rather they stay in foster care than be adopted by loving parents who will go thru a stringent investigation & absorb the cost of legal protocols?

what about those homogays that go thru the medical means to have a biological child? should THEY be put into foster care because their parents don't love the way you approve?

Easiest question! Because people who had unprotected sex when they had no business doing so, had the kids instead of killing them. Now if we could just stop ignorant people who can't control their lust, from engaging in unprotected sex we could take care of the first part

 

[playtime]

Easiest question! Because people who had unprotected sex when they had no business doing so,

how very fascist of you.

had the kids instead of killing them.

'cept killing kids is already against the law.

Now if we could just stop ignorant people who can't control their lust, from engaging in unprotected sex we could take care of the first part

see part 1 of my reply.