Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I'll bet that was the last time that a$$hole engaged in 'Political Posturing' using his Armed Forces along the borders of Israel..."...It was obvious Political Postering by Nasser..."
God called the Israeli Prime Minister last night and told him to hang onto it for a while.Jerusalem belongs to God so whatever he says should be done with it should be done with it and that's that.
Nah, Arabs tried over and over to destroy the Jewish state and failed miserably each time. 1967 was just another example.Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia a tour of the 67 War...It was obvious Political Postering by Nasser...He wanted Public Aprooval for his Arab Leadership asperations , and the 6 day war surely prooves that it was a War of Aggression to Annex Land.If those quates are wrong, or is this your usual Camel Crap? Alan Hart is a goole search, I'm sure Wiki has the same...
No matter which way you put it, Alan Hart has no credibility. I've read that article before and it's filled with lies, sorry just my opinion.
To think that Israel was the aggressor in the 1967 war is absurd. Look at a map of Israel compared to Syria, Egypt and Jordan, who also had plenty of support from about 8 other Arab/Muslim States.
There is nothing that says that the belligerent who fired the first shot is the aggressor
That simple.
Sounds like you know all the haters, but they are just trees in a forest. Most Jews and Arab would share Palestine and recognized as a Jewish State by the Arab League.There's your Alan Hart, sounds like he makes his living bashing Jews and Israel:If those quates are wrong, or is this your usual Camel Crap? Alan Hart is a goole search, I'm sure Wiki has the same...Alan Hart? Professional anti Semite and false propagandist. Next?
Some have gone further. For example, Alan Hart, once a reporter for BBC, alleged in a May 2010 Internet radio interview with Kevin Barrett that Israel and the Mossad were behind the 9/11 attacks.
After pre-emptively trying to dismiss charges of anti-Semitism, Hart asserts:
I tell you what I honestly believe. I think it started out as an all-Muslim operation, but I think it would have been very quickly penetrated by Mossad agents My guess is at an early point they said to the bad guys at the CIA, 'Hey this operation is running. What do we do?" And the Zionists and the neo-cons said, 'Let's use it."
Hart's interview has appeared on YouTube and other places on the Internet. His video is just one of thousands online blaming Jews or Israel for 9/11. These videos have been seen by tens of thousands of people and continue to gain currency among those who wish to demonize Israel and the Jews.
In May 2010, Hart stated on various media, including the Kevin Barrett Show, that consultants close to the worlds most prominent construction company assured him that The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes. Hart also speculated that the planes had been fitted with transponders and that Israeli Mossad agents guided them into the towers. Regarding the purpose of the 9/11 attacks, Hart stated that: My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA hey this operations running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said lets use it. Hart also stated that the Israeli operation which became 9/11 was likely aided by certain corrupt American leaders.[9][10]
In another interview, Hart stated that "In my analysis theres enough evidence visual, technical and scientific, and from eye-witnesses including fire fighters to invite the conclusion that the Twin Towers, like Building Seven, were pre-wired for controlled demolition with nanothermite, the highest-tech military explosive."[11]
Books[edit]
He also stated that the "Jews who went to Palestine in answer to Zionisms call had no biological connection to the ancient Hebrews. The incoming Zionist Jews were mainly foreign nationals of many lands... The notion that there are two entire peoples with an equally valid claim to the same land is an historical nonsense.".[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hart_(writer)
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia a tour of the 67 War...It was obvious Political Postering by Nasser...He wanted Public Aprooval for his Arab Leadership asperations , and the 6 day war surely prooves that it was a War of Aggression to Annex Land.If those quates are wrong, or is this your usual Camel Crap? Alan Hart is a goole search, I'm sure Wiki has the same...
No matter which way you put it, Alan Hart has no credibility. I've read that article before and it's filled with lies, sorry just my opinion.
To think that Israel was the aggressor in the 1967 war is absurd. Look at a map of Israel compared to Syria, Egypt and Jordan, who also had plenty of support from about 8 other Arab/Muslim States.
There is nothing that says that the belligerent who fired the first shot is the aggressor
That simple.
Can you ask him/her to speak up? No-one can hear him but you!Jerusalem belongs to God so whatever he says should be done with it should be done with it and that's that.
Yeah, Israel also made peace with the Jordanians. But Palestinians never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. It also has to do with the fact that external factors such as Iran and Syria have such great influence that they will never allow the Palestinians to enter into any concrete treaty with Israel. The survival of many of these regimes and groups depends on the continuation of the Palestinian conflict.
They also conquered the Sinai, which they gave back in exchange for peace.
You just quoted this "hater", moron. I learned about these haters from anti Semites like you that keep repeating their lies and propaganda as legitimate sources. There's a few more losers like this Hart character.Sounds like you know all the haters, but they are just trees in a forest. Most Jews and Arab would share Palestine and recognized as a Jewish State by the Arab League.There's your Alan Hart, sounds like he makes his living bashing Jews and Israel:If those quates are wrong, or is this your usual Camel Crap? Alan Hart is a goole search, I'm sure Wiki has the same...
Some have gone further. For example, Alan Hart, once a reporter for BBC, alleged in a May 2010 Internet radio interview with Kevin Barrett that Israel and the Mossad were behind the 9/11 attacks.
After pre-emptively trying to dismiss charges of anti-Semitism, Hart asserts:
Hart's interview has appeared on YouTube and other places on the Internet. His video is just one of thousands online blaming Jews or Israel for 9/11. These videos have been seen by tens of thousands of people and continue to gain currency among those who wish to demonize Israel and the Jews.
In May 2010, Hart stated on various media, including the Kevin Barrett Show, that consultants close to the world’s most prominent construction company assured him that “The twin towers were brought down by a controlled ground explosion, not the planes.” Hart also speculated that the planes had been fitted with transponders and that Israeli Mossad agents guided them into the towers. Regarding the purpose of the 9/11 attacks, Hart stated that: “My guess is that at an early point they said to the bad guys in the CIA – hey this operation’s running what do we do, and the zionists and the neo-cons said let’s use it.” Hart also stated that the Israeli operation which became 9/11 was likely aided by certain corrupt American leaders.[9][10]
In another interview, Hart stated that "In my analysis there’s enough evidence – visual, technical and scientific, and from eye-witnesses including fire fighters – to invite the conclusion that the Twin Towers, like Building Seven, were pre-wired for controlled demolition with nanothermite, the highest-tech military explosive."[11]
Books[edit]
He also stated that the "Jews who went to Palestine in answer to Zionism’s call had no biological connection to the ancient Hebrews. The incoming Zionist Jews were mainly foreign nationals of many lands... The notion that there are two entire peoples with an equally valid claim to the same land is an historical nonsense.".[3]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Hart_(writer)
This is Israel's real opportunity for Legitimacy by the Arabs and the World.
I hope they don’t miss this Historic Oppurtunity.
They'd be lucky to get a portion of those offers today. That boat left a long time ago. And with the passing of time, it's getting much worse for the Palestinians. As I said the only real option is Israel eventually annexing the West Bank or creation of a mini Palestinian state in the West Bank, that guarantees the safety of the Jews that are already there. There isn't going to be a removal of over 300,000 Jews from the West Bank. As they say, those are the "facts in the ground" that dictate the conditions of any deal. Gaza will not be part of any deal.Then there was the offers made to the Palestinians for a peace treaty in 1993, 2000, and 2008 which they refused
Bah! For every Hawking there are a thousand scientists that respect and admire Israel.If Dr. Hawkins is an anti-Semite because he can see the forrest from the trees, I take your accusations of anti-Semistism as a despereate defenses when you cannot attack the logic of what is posted...Some anti Semites like Paeballs do a good job hiding their anti Semetism but when exposed you will find them to be even worse than the openly anti Semitic ones such as Sherri.I have been struggling mightily to avoid casting our colleague "pbel" in the same mold as Sherri and GeorgeP, despite increasing indications to the contrary as this newcomer (me) has been finding his way around this board system.
Post #278 cured me of that particular bit of foolishness.
Remember how you were once told be be careful of the quiet ones that show very little emotion?
To me, the truth matters.
...Jerusalem is off the table.
Then there was the offers made to the Palestinians for a peace treaty in 1993, 2000, and 2008 which they refused
That's fine, right up to the moment when the Israelis begin condemning whole city blocks under eminent domain, paying-off the residents, evicting them from their homes, refusing to sell or rent replacement housing to them inside the City, and setting them on the road to other destinations. There's a much easier workaround to that than you're giving credit for, and the Israelis will not hesitate for one moment to undertake such measures if it becomes clear to them that they are 'losing' Jerusalem in the manner that you describe."...unless you want Jerusalem to eventually become an Arab city due to the Palestinians' very high birthrate."
Then there was the offers made to the Palestinians for a peace treaty in 1993, 2000, and 2008 which they refused
No final settlement was offered in 1993.
The 2000 offer gave the Palestinians only 75% of the West Bank for the next 25 years. No Palestinians leader would accept such a deal.
The 2008 offer by Olmert was meaningless as he was about to be indicted for felony charges and was in no position to offer anyone anything, nor to carry out such a deal.
The 2000 proposal (Camp David summit) would have given the Palestinians 92% of the West Bank . They would get 75% right away and the rest over the next decade.
Olmerts deal was incredibly generous, and if you or any other pro - Palestinian think a better offer will be proposed, you will be sorely dissapointed.
The '67 border will never happen
Right of return will never happen.
The sooner people can accept this, the sooner we can move on !
Don't look now, but what the Palestinians consider 'acceptable' or 'unacceptable' is quickly becoming a moot point, as they continue to be squeezed off of the few scraps of land still remaining to them, and stacked higher on top of each other, or shunted off to Lebanon or Jordan. The days of Attractive Deals have passed, and the same is now almost true even for Bad Deals. They should have cut a Good Deal years ago, while they still could. Too late now."...Sorry, but that was totally unacceptable..."
Don't look now, but what the Palestinians consider 'acceptable' or 'unacceptable' is quickly becoming a moot point, as they continue to be squeezed off of the few scraps of land still remaining to them, and stacked higher on top of each other, or shunted off to Lebanon or Jordan. The days of Attractive Deals have passed, and the same is now almost true even for Bad Deals. They should have cut a Good Deal years ago, while they still could. Too late now. and the Ironic and funny part about that is, the world at-large is beginning not to care any longer; being bone-weary of this $hit and just wanting it to be over."...Sorry, but that was totally unacceptable..."
...The days of Attractive Deals have passed, and the same is now almost true even for Bad Deals. They should have cut a Good Deal years ago, while they still could. Too late now. and the Ironic and funny part about that is, the world at-large is beginning not to care any longer; being bone-weary of this $hit and just wanting it to be over.
