Lakhota
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #121
I think so. I admit that she comes across as somewhat goofy in interviews - but she's experienced, smart, and very effective. She gets results. She remembers Nixon and Watergate. HOWEVER, I believe she should be forced to clarify her positions on how she will lead the House before she is voted on - especially on all things Trump.
What do you think?
Since it matters not to me, I’ll throw in my 2 cents and even try to do it without partisanship.
Whether she should be speaker or not depends on what her party wants to become. It seems to me that they have not figured it out. Nancy represents the old guard and I’m not sure that that is the way a lot of the democrats want to go anymore. But then is it the right time to go in the “Democratic Socialist” direction yet? I think that is where a growing majority of the party wants to go and I don’t think that Pelosi represents that direction no matter what she says.
It’s a good question and will be interesting to watch.
Thank you for your input. You make some very good points. I can't think of anymore more qualified and suitable to be Speaker at this time than Pelosi. I would like for her to lead the Trump oversight - at least for one year. She can walk and chew gum at the same time, so I expect she can accomplish much more than just Trump oversight. HOWEVER, as I said in my OP: I believe she should be forced to clarify her positions on how she will lead the House before she is voted on - especially on all things Trump.