Rigby5
Diamond Member
- Apr 23, 2017
- 31,994
- 10,783
It's not deceptive terminology. In fact, it is an accurate economic term which reflects the fact they are an expenditure which has to be paid for. And they are paid for by higher tax rates and borrowing.You clearly do not know what tax expenditures are.Nope. Eliminating tax expenditures would not only balance the budget, it would provide a surplus which could be used to LOWER tax rates for EVERYONE.That would be a disaster for the country. Budget Deficits would balloon and the country would no longer be able to defend its interest around the world.
What you don't realize is all the functions of government that are necessary for the country to survive. Those things have to be properly funded. If you cut spending by 50%, that won't happen.
Likely you are correct, but you have to admit it is deceptive terminology and you could explain it better or use a different term. I had to look it up myself in order to know what you were talking about.
That's why I use the term very deliberately. It is the denial that they are an expenditure which is deceptive. I am undoing that deception by using the accurate and correct term.
If we eliminated tax expenditures, we would realize several benefits.
First, the budget would be balanced and we could lower tax rates for everyone.
Second, we would no longer have the existing insane system where entities earning identical incomes pay radically different taxes.
Third, we would no longer be hostage to a government behavioral control program which rewards and punishes certain behaviors.
Fourth, the incentive for special interests to bribe our politicians to put tax expenditures in the tax code for them would be removed. Instant campaign finance reform the RIGHT way.
I agree with your points, except that the words "tax expenditures" sounds like congress spending tax revenue. And when it is an allowance for taxpayers to write off some business expenses in a very selective and arbitrary manner by congress, that usually has some more descriptive terminology, like deduction or credit.
Expenditure sounds like it is money congress has already collected and has in hand, when in reality it is like congress spent the money, but only in a very abstract way because it was never in the hands of Congress. It really is more like an exemption.