Dayton3
Gold Member
- May 3, 2009
- 3,407
- 1,303
- 198
US oil companies receive hundreds of billion of dollars every year in subsidies.
Please provide evidence from unbiased sources.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
US oil companies receive hundreds of billion of dollars every year in subsidies.
We shouldn't be subsidizing oil companies. But government shouldn't be allowed to use such subsidies for arm-twisting, in any case.We always hear from the right that US oil can lower gas prices, but the truth is that the vast majority of US oil is sold to other countries, because the oil companies can make more money exporting it than selling it domestically.
I think we should stop subsidizing any oil company that does not sell at least 51% of the oil they drill in the US. The American taxpayers shouldn't be forced to subsidize companies that only care about profit and don't care about helping their country.
Please provide evidence from unbiased sources.
So, you are aware that, by their own statements, Exxon made over $23 billion net last year..
At the average of 377 gallons of Motor Fuel a day at $4.00 a gallon ($1.51 billion)
And 166 million gallons of Aviation Fuel a day at $4.80 a gallon ($796.8 million)
The Oil Companies sell us $2.31 billion a day in fuel alone.
Not to mention they get it from the ground, through the refinery and in a gas station in your neighborhood.
That's just fuel and the numbers you see will look huge because we use a lot of damn oil ...
.
So, you are aware that, by their own statements, Exxon made over $23 billion net last year.
Oil company profits are chump change. $1,700 BILLION the amount Dems have vampire sucked from students trying to get a college degree.
The Keystone pipeline still does operate under those rules. For some reason morons have been sold the nonsense the XL is the only pipeline out there ...
I acknowledge you're a self-righteous Cretin who knows about 1/100 of what he thinks he knows.
$23 billion you say. Dems have raked in $1,700 billion scamming students on student loans, plus interest.So, you are aware that, by their own statements, Exxon made over $23 billion net last year.
I have yet to see anything like the massive production cuts in 2020 under Trump happen during Biden.
If you he oil is drilled HERE and we need more oil, then exports should be decreased dramatically. After all it's OUR oil, not the oil companies oil.
Who said anything about them sourcing it from oversees. I am talking about oil drilled in the US. Almost all of it is exported. If more of it was sold in the US, it could help lower gas prices. But the companies choose to export because they can make more money selling it oversees than domestically. And if they make that choice, they shouldn't receive tax subsidies.
Exxon says, not I. What the "Dems" say or do is something else and has nothing to do with me. Companies having so much economic and, by consequence, political power is obviously dangerous to any nation.$23 billion you say. Dems have raked in $1,700 billion scamming students on student loans, plus interest.
25 percent of our oil is from govt lands.Actually it's property owners oil. Most of our oil comes from private land. The landowner sells his or her oil to oil companies. The only oil that's actually "ours" is oil drilled on public land.
Actually it's property owners oil. Most of our oil comes from private land. The landowner sells his or her oil to oil companies. The only oil that's actually "ours" is oil drilled on public land.
Actually it's property owners oil. Most of our oil comes from private land. The landowner sells his or her oil to oil companies. The only oil that's actually "ours" is oil drilled on public land.
Do you think if they produce more oil they should learn less?The quantity of profit. Are you trying to confuse things?
His opinion is based on an error. The US doesn't export much oil.We shouldn't be subsidizing oil companies. But government shouldn't be allowed to use such subsidies for arm-twisting, in any case.