Should we always believe women accusers?

[Asclepias]

Woman who lied about rape at Michigan college sentenced to jail

'Every district attorney’s nightmare': Two men exonerated in 1991 rape claim

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...-to-falsely-accusing-2-black-m-1826645429/amp

New York woman, 20, who lied about rapes, appears to roll her eyes in court as she's jailed for a year

No Jail Sentence for Woman Who Falsely Claimed Rape by Three Unidentified Black Men





At what point do we start demanding more evidence to prevent lives being destroyed on accusations alone?
How do you determine who to believe and who not to believe unless you begin with a standard of requirements for such accusations to be credible?

Always is a big word. So... “No.” Would seem to be the reasonable answer...

I think women should be believed until it can be proven they are lying.

Really? And why shouldn’t men be believed until it’s proved they are lying?

Because way more men rape women than the other way around for starters.

 

[Montrovant]

If you're just talking about personal opinions and not legal issues, I think it should be taken on a case-by-case basis. Whether you're going to believe the accused or the accuser will depend on the details of the accusation, what sort of evidence is available to the public, and what opinions you may already hold about the accused and/or accuser. There is no blanket answer for every accusation IMO.

 

[Flash]

Should we believe a woman accuser when is a

...a filthy ass hate mongering Democrat who is suffering from TDS?

...a woman whose family was judged against by the mother of the person she is accusing?

...a woman who marched around in a pink pussy hat?

...a woman who is a college professor that her students says she is bat shit crazy and vindictive?

...a woman whose brother is linked to Fusion GPS?

I don't think so.

 

[Missourian]

I don't believe her. So the answer is no.

 

[Missourian]

Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.

Why just this, and not everything?

 

[Brain357]

Repubs will believe if against a dem.
Dems will believe if against a repub.

Always partisan.

 

[Avatar4321]

Make a judgment based on evidence case by case

 

[karpenter]

Fuck no. Some idiot pulled the theory out of their ass and declared it so. Probably some progressive.

It Was Hillary

 

[Asclepias]

Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.

Why just this, and not everything?

Not sure what you mean? I tend to believe one side or the other in everything. Once I see all the facts I give myself permission to admit I was wrong in my belief or pat myself on the back for being correct.

 

[Meister]

Kavanaugh is guilty as sin because Trump nominated him.

 

[WillowTree]

Woman who lied about rape at Michigan college sentenced to jail

'Every district attorney’s nightmare': Two men exonerated in 1991 rape claim

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...-to-falsely-accusing-2-black-m-1826645429/amp

New York woman, 20, who lied about rapes, appears to roll her eyes in court as she's jailed for a year

No Jail Sentence for Woman Who Falsely Claimed Rape by Three Unidentified Black Men





At what point do we start demanding more evidence to prevent lives being destroyed on accusations alone?
How do you determine who to believe and who not to believe unless you begin with a standard of requirements for such accusations to be credible?

Always is a big word. So... “No.” Would seem to be the reasonable answer...

I think women should be believed until it can be proven they are lying.

Really? And why shouldn’t men be believed until it’s proved they are lying?

Because way more men rape women than the other way around for starters.

That is a stupid reason.

 

[Vastator]

Make a judgment based on evidence case by case

Not sure about the laws in the state where this allegedly happened; but I would think that the statute of limitations makes it a moot point. The time between when this supposedly happened, and when she decided to make an issue of it is beyond suspect. And frankly not worth consideration...

 

[Asclepias]

Woman who lied about rape at Michigan college sentenced to jail

'Every district attorney’s nightmare': Two men exonerated in 1991 rape claim

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...-to-falsely-accusing-2-black-m-1826645429/amp

New York woman, 20, who lied about rapes, appears to roll her eyes in court as she's jailed for a year

No Jail Sentence for Woman Who Falsely Claimed Rape by Three Unidentified Black Men





At what point do we start demanding more evidence to prevent lives being destroyed on accusations alone?
How do you determine who to believe and who not to believe unless you begin with a standard of requirements for such accusations to be credible?

Always is a big word. So... “No.” Would seem to be the reasonable answer...

I think women should be believed until it can be proven they are lying.

Really? And why shouldn’t men be believed until it’s proved they are lying?

Because way more men rape women than the other way around for starters.

That is a stupid reason.

Its only a stupid reason if youre a stupid person.

 

[jc456]

Never have. I think Franken was a fking fool. if a women ever thought a moment was inappropriate, then there needed to be a report somewhere to document the moment it happened. End of fking story. I don't care who it is, dem or repub. don't care. It's wrong on every level to come out decades later and make some hokie accusation.

 

[edward37]

Kavanaugh is guilty as sin because Trump nominated him.

How have all the others trump wanted done? He brought the cess pool to DC with him How many are gone?? Last count I got was 60

 

[jc456]

Like the one that always yells at the top of their lungs "fake News". Should we always believe that fool?

Woman who lied about rape at Michigan college sentenced to jail

'Every district attorney’s nightmare': Two men exonerated in 1991 rape claim

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.th...-to-falsely-accusing-2-black-m-1826645429/amp

New York woman, 20, who lied about rapes, appears to roll her eyes in court as she's jailed for a year

No Jail Sentence for Woman Who Falsely Claimed Rape by Three Unidentified Black Men





At what point do we start demanding more evidence to prevent lives being destroyed on accusations alone?
How do you determine who to believe and who not to believe unless you begin with a standard of requirements for such accusations to be credible?

when the facts back him up all the time, sure.

 

[Asclepias]

Kavanaugh is guilty as sin because Trump nominated him.

Drumpf does seem to have talent for surrounding himself with criminals.

 

[LaDexter]

Hillary during the Clarence Thomas hearings....

"When a woman accuses a man of sexual harassment, we should believe the woman!!!"

Hillary after Bill settled the Paula Jones lawsuit....

"It is all a vast right wing conspiracy"

 

[Meister]

Kavanaugh is guilty as sin because Trump nominated him.

Drumpf does seem to have talent for surrounding himself with criminals.

Opie would have had the same issue if it wasn't for a crooked Holder and Lynch.

 

[The VOR]

But the majority of rape claims are bogus bullshit by manipulative women who regret consenting to it.

I'm guessing that statement is based on nothing but the idiotic thoughts bouncing around in your fucked up skull.