Show Me the Fossils!

Giant Noah's Ark Attraction In Kentucky Features Caged Dinosaurs​

Come on. This is actual earth history, just a few thousand years ago. Didn't you know that evilutionist atheist scientists are out every night, under cover of darkness with their spades and shovels planting evidence as a part of their global conspiracy?

I thought you had this all figured out.








It's like the 'Flintstones,' except on a big boat.
Ed Mazza | HuffPost

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/noahs-ark-dinosaurs_n_577d9ff8e4b0344d514dea93
https://twitter.com/share?text=That giant Noah's Ark in Kentucky features dinosaurs in cages&url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/noahs-ark-dinosaurs_n_577d9ff8e4b0344d514dea93?utm_campaign=share_twitter&ncid=engmodushpmg00000004&hashtags=&via=HuffPostWeird



Dinosaurs on display in a cage at the Ark Encounter in Kentucky. The creationist behind the attraction claims dinosaurs and man lived together.


Dinosaurs on display in a cage at the Ark Encounter in Kentucky. The creationist behind the attraction claims dinosaurs and man lived together.
BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES
Am I allowed to adopt one?
 
I'd be perfectly happy if people would say, "Darwin's mechanism for that evolution, natural selection, is a plausible theory but the truth is likely to be more complicated." I agree with that statement, my argument is with people who claim that Darwin's theories are scientific fact.

I wonder if that statement were put on a sticker for textbooks, if the USSC would say that it amounted to "establishment of religion." Based on precedent, it would.
I you agree that descent from a common ancestor has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, we agree.
 
The 'Evolution' is NOT proven...that is why it is called THEORY of Evolution. Some of you omitting the term THEORY. And that's why you are so confused.

Now...why is it so important to you that this theory of evolution be right? think hard.
 
hollie said:
Not at all. The evidence that biological organisms evolve is well documented. That species adapt and change due to environmental pressures is also well documented.

that's not evolution. That's adaptation. TWO very VERY different things. I understand why evolutionists try to conflate the two. It's all they've got to hold onto. But it is not scientific, it is not legitimate.
 
Just dealing with the one, arguably the most famous and now debunked Lucy...australopithecus afarensis..... only fragments of her bones were found 47 out of 200 plus and so......scientists had to 'interpret' the parts missing. now come on man. That is not science as what we grew up with, observational science....it is the new science...historical or origins science. Where the scientist gets to make it up as he goes along.
 

Forum List

Back
Top