Since Co2 does nothing, what does cause Earth climate change?

[EMH]

Dude, stay willfully ignorant, I posted why in now two videos

You are a full participant in deceiving Americans about the truth of the Co2 FRAUD.

You are a liar, a weasel, a chicken, and a horseshit excuse of a "person of science"

 

[jc456]

Drug addicted morons at homeless shelters endlessly watch phone videos.... and believe every one!!

People who have nothing post this ^^^^^^^

 

[jc456]

You are a full participant in deceiving Americans about the truth of the Co2 FRAUD.

You are a liar, a weasel, a chicken, and a horseshit excuse of a "person of science"

Yet, still nothing to refute

 

[EMH]

Yet, still nothing to refute

Refute the OP.

Any evidence of land within 600 miles of an Earth pole not in ICE AGE? NO

Any evidence of land outside 600 miles of an Earth pole in ICE AGE? NO

Hence, since land moves, Earth climate change truth isn't hard to comprehend....

 

[EMH]

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[jc456]

Refute the OP.

Any evidence of land within 600 miles of an Earth pole not in ICE AGE? NO

Any evidence of land outside 600 miles of an Earth pole in ICE AGE? NO

Hence, since land moves, Earth climate change truth isn't hard to comprehend....

I did. Separation from South America is why Antarctica and separation from North America for Greenland .

 

[jc456]

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

Again, it’s explained in my first video on the different ice ages

 

[EMH]

Separation from South America is why Antarctica

Antarctic and South America are discussed in detail in that link....



The original definition of ICE AGE which is still used today was formed without any knowledge that land moves via the tectonic plates. It was thought that glaciation of South America's southern tip was the result of ice from Antarctica, in its current position, growing out over ocean and freezing up southern South America "during an ice age". Since 2010 that is now recorded, cough cough, as a rapid series of Dennis Quaid style ice ages coming and going. Neither of those are correct. As this map with sea level depth exposed shows, South America on the southern tip glaciated because 20 million or so years ago it was still attached to Antarctica, but isn't anymore and that's why it melted to just mountains today...

Antarctica itself has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, because 70 million years ago it was not on the South Pole (and not covered with 2+ mile thick ice age glacier), but halfway to South Africa where it originated.




Rule 1 = Ice Age Glacier does not grow out over ocean, it breaks off - see Antarctica and Greenland, Titanic

Rule 2 = Ice Ages are Continent Specific Events because of Rule 1


The proof of this is the indisputable fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed. 20k years ago there was ice still in Chicago and Indiana. That is now gone. The Vikings were farming the southern tip of Greenland until the 1400s, when they were frozen off/out. For the past 20k years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. How far back that goes is in debate now, but it is a laughable debate. The data from Greenland is pretty well defined.

Greenland was unfrozen, completely unfrozen, 2 million years ago, as its northern tip was a flourishing forest....

A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature​

Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...

www.nature.com
Center of Greenland went from forest to ice age 400-800k years ago...

Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green​

Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.

www.livescience.com

The continent specific ice age on Greenland is under 2 million years old.


North America had this for either 75k years or 30-50 million years (the latter is the sane answer)

This map was done before the data from Greenland kept rolling in, as it was assumed Greenland and NA were attached and Greenland had been frozen for a long time = NOT THE CASE according to the data above. North America was covered with ice age glacier down to Indiana. That is the debate in the first link at the top of the post, how old that ice was and how long it took to grow and melt. Clearly, it melted, and Greenland is now frozen.

North America thawed while Greenland froze. Ice Ages are continent specific (with a planetary effect) but not planetary. THAT is the DATA...


So what causes an ICE AGE?


Land moving near the poles. When land gets to within - roughly- 600 miles of a pole, as Greenland just did, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and then it starts to stack. Stack for a million or 2 years = Greenland. Stack for 40+ million years = Antarctica. Ice ages like North American Ice Age end when the land moves outside of the 600 miles to a pole barrier.

Greenland and Antarctica are ice ages. Earth Climate Change is 99% about where land is. If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice (much warmer). If Earth had two polar continents, two "Antarcticas" it would have roughly twice the ice, oceans would be lower, there would be a thinner atmosphere with less humidity, and it would be colder...


Earth climate change is about ice. Ice controls sea level, temperature, atmospheric thickness, and humidity.

Ice is about where land is. 90% on Antarctica, 7% on Greenland today.

Land moves.

Not that hard.

Atmosphere, Co2 in atmosphere and Sun are not causes of climate CHANGE. Co2 does nothing. Sun is constant. What changes is where land is...

If you understand what an ice age is, it all makes sense. If you blur it and allow the Co2 fraud to define "ice age" as a Dennis Quaid movie, you are lost, and you are playing their game of debating their fudged fraud....

 

[EMH]

separation from North America for Greenland

You and the Co2 FRAUD have ZERO EVIDENCE that NA and Greenland were ever attached. The two ice ages went opposite directions at the same time, completely refuting

Co2 FRAUD
Milankovich
glacials/interglacials

and every stupid video you post from Youtube.

 

[jc456]

Antarctic and South America are discussed in detail in that link....



The original definition of ICE AGE which is still used today was formed without any knowledge that land moves via the tectonic plates. It was thought that glaciation of South America's southern tip was the result of ice from Antarctica, in its current position, growing out over ocean and freezing up southern South America "during an ice age". Since 2010 that is now recorded, cough cough, as a rapid series of Dennis Quaid style ice ages coming and going. Neither of those are correct. As this map with sea level depth exposed shows, South America on the southern tip glaciated because 20 million or so years ago it was still attached to Antarctica, but isn't anymore and that's why it melted to just mountains today...

Antarctica itself has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, because 70 million years ago it was not on the South Pole (and not covered with 2+ mile thick ice age glacier), but halfway to South Africa where it originated.




Rule 1 = Ice Age Glacier does not grow out over ocean, it breaks off - see Antarctica and Greenland, Titanic

Rule 2 = Ice Ages are Continent Specific Events because of Rule 1


The proof of this is the indisputable fact that Greenland froze while North America thawed. 20k years ago there was ice still in Chicago and Indiana. That is now gone. The Vikings were farming the southern tip of Greenland until the 1400s, when they were frozen off/out. For the past 20k years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. How far back that goes is in debate now, but it is a laughable debate. The data from Greenland is pretty well defined.

Greenland was unfrozen, completely unfrozen, 2 million years ago, as its northern tip was a flourishing forest....

A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature​

Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...

www.nature.com
Center of Greenland went from forest to ice age 400-800k years ago...

Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green​

Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.

www.livescience.com

The continent specific ice age on Greenland is under 2 million years old.


North America had this for either 75k years or 30-50 million years (the latter is the sane answer)

This map was done before the data from Greenland kept rolling in, as it was assumed Greenland and NA were attached and Greenland had been frozen for a long time = NOT THE CASE according to the data above. North America was covered with ice age glacier down to Indiana. That is the debate in the first link at the top of the post, how old that ice was and how long it took to grow and melt. Clearly, it melted, and Greenland is now frozen.

North America thawed while Greenland froze. Ice Ages are continent specific (with a planetary effect) but not planetary. THAT is the DATA...


So what causes an ICE AGE?


Land moving near the poles. When land gets to within - roughly- 600 miles of a pole, as Greenland just did, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and then it starts to stack. Stack for a million or 2 years = Greenland. Stack for 40+ million years = Antarctica. Ice ages like North American Ice Age end when the land moves outside of the 600 miles to a pole barrier.

Greenland and Antarctica are ice ages. Earth Climate Change is 99% about where land is. If Earth had two polar oceans, it would have no ice (much warmer). If Earth had two polar continents, two "Antarcticas" it would have roughly twice the ice, oceans would be lower, there would be a thinner atmosphere with less humidity, and it would be colder...


Earth climate change is about ice. Ice controls sea level, temperature, atmospheric thickness, and humidity.

Ice is about where land is. 90% on Antarctica, 7% on Greenland today.

Land moves.

Not that hard.

Atmosphere, Co2 in atmosphere and Sun are not causes of climate CHANGE. Co2 does nothing. Sun is constant. What changes is where land is...

If you understand what an ice age is, it all makes sense. If you blur it and allow the Co2 fraud to define "ice age" as a Dennis Quaid movie, you are lost, and you are playing their game of debating their fudged fraud....

Well again, there have been ice ages due to many different reasons. Your fantasy is wrong and each explained in the first video I posted

 

[EMH]

Well again, there have been ice ages due to many different reasons. Your fantasy is wrong and each explained in the first video I posted

Your "the video explains it" is bullshit.

You have ZERO EVIDENCE to refute anything posted here. ZERO.

Go ahead and post 500 more videos. None of them refute it.

The 600 miles to the pole is indisputable, you know it, you won't admit it, because you are a slimy lowlife low character liar... as is everyone else employed by the Co2 FRAUD, especially the "faux skeptics" like you, Ding, and Toddster...

 

[jc456]

Your "the video explains it" is bullshit.

You have ZERO EVIDENCE to refute anything posted here. ZERO.

Go ahead and post 500 more videos. None of them refute it.

The 600 miles to the pole is indisputable, you know it, you won't admit it, because you are a slimy lowlife low character liar... as is everyone else employed by the Co2 FRAUD, especially the "faux skeptics" like you, Ding, and Toddster...

First is huronian ice age, 300 million years long and unknown origin.

Second, ice age began because of volcano eruptions and new rocks with CO2 and that reaction with h2o creating Chemical weathering chemically creating calcium carbonate creating new rock by drawing co2 out of the air the cryogenian ice age creating plankton was 100 million years long


Third one was Andean-Saharan ice age and again, really unknown to what caused it , speculation is a orcdovician meteor event in the asteroid belt sending debris to earth shutting out sunlight in earth’s atmosphere 30 million year long

Over time the ice melt caused decreasing albedo of the surface and more heat absorption for 200 million years when Antarctica broke away from South America
Causing the circumpolar Antarctic current isolating Antarctica no more heated water to go around the pole.

Greenland separation and the other northern continents closed around the northern pole keeping warmer water out.
Quaternary ice age

And why we still have ice at both poles

 

[EMH]

First is huronian ice age, 300 million years long and unknown origin.

Second, ice age began because of volcano eruptions and new rocks with CO2 and that reaction with h2o creating Chemical weathering chemically creating calcium carbonate creating new rock by drawing co2 out of the air the cryogenian ice age creating plankton was 100 million years long


Third one was Andean-Saharan ice age and again, really unknown to what caused it , speculation is a orcdovician meteor event in the asteroid belt sending debris to earth shutting out sunlight in earth’s atmosphere 30 million year long

Over time the ice melt caused decreasing albedo of the surface and more heat absorption for 200 million years when Antarctica broke away from South America
Causing the circumpolar Antarctic current isolating Antarctica no more heated water to go around the pole.

Greenland separation and the other northern continents closed around the northern pole keeping warmer water out.
Quaternary ice age

And why we still have ice at both poles

South America's southern tip melted because it broke off Antarctica and moved outside of 600 miles to the pole.

We have ice at both poles simply because there is land there. Two polar oceans and Earth has no ice. Ice is about land near the poles, which is why 97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to the poles.

Everything else is 100% Co2 FRAUD bullshit.

 

[Crick]

South America's southern tip melted because it broke off Antarctica and moved outside of 600 miles to the pole.

We have ice at both poles simply because there is land there. Two polar oceans and Earth has no ice. Ice is about land near the poles, which is why 97% of Earth ice is on the two land masses closest to the poles.

Everything else is 100% Co2 FRAUD bullshit.

What happens to the infrared light that CO2 and water vapor absorb?

 

[jc456]

What happens to the infrared light that CO2 and water vapor absorb?

The issue is we have too much oxygen

 

[EMH]

What happens to the infrared light that CO2 and water vapor absorb?

All gasses absorb part of EM spectrum. O3 absorbs powerful UV. IR is weak. That is why it does nothing...

 

[EMH]

The issue is we have too much oxygen

The taxpayer pays this treasonous liar to post this shit....

 

[Crick]

The issue is we have too much oxygen

You didn't answer my question. What happens to the infrared radiation absorbed by CO2 and water vapor?

 

[jc456]

You didn't answer my question. What happens to the infrared radiation absorbed by CO2 and water vapor?

since the earth has convection, what you're pushing here is not what happens on earth. Here video for you.

 

[EMH]

You didn't answer my question. What happens to the infrared radiation absorbed by CO2 and water vapor?

It doesn't warm JACK SHIT.

Sincerely,

highly correlated satellite and balloon data