Redfish
Diamond Member
- Jan 29, 2013
- 48,222
- 10,697
Which is consistent with wrongheaded conservative dogma: where income should determine the quality of healthcare and education, and those too poor to afford either should do without, the consequence of having ‘failed’ to be successful.why do the left wing regressives insist that college should be free...or rather, that the money for people's education should be extracted at gunpoint from other taxpayers....many of whom will not go to college?
Why don't they insist that those people attending college on the taxpayers expense, pay back the money they get......?
Why is that such a hard concept for bernie and hilary and the rest of the left wing regressives to get?
I'm sorry, guy, when was the last time the government extracted taxes from you at "gunpoint". I though with all your tiny-dicked whining about all the guns you own to protect yourself from Government tyranny, the IRS would have quite the mess on its hands when it came to collect your tax bill.
Reality. you probably submitted your 1040 before this weekend. Meekly. Without a fight.
But anyway.. College.
I'm not keen on the government paying for college. I think kids should come out of High School with the requisite skills they need to hold down and make a good living.
But as long as you have corporations INSISTING that they won't consider an applicant without a college degree, then that should be available to everyone, just like HS and Elementary education are.
It is available to everyone. You just have to pay for it yourself, that's all.
You want to make K - 12 that way, and let the poor kids go without an education?
The neo-Social Darwinism advocated by most conservatives is one of the more reprehensible aspects of the American right.
the constitution guarantees the PURSUIT of happiness, it does not guarantee that everyone will achieve it.
Not everyone can be Oprah, what you make of your life it up to you, not the government.