Since we live in a country where a majority of Americans are in agreement............

[Auld Phart]

Leaving millions of people under represented.

Leaving millions of people under represented.

and each state equally represented.

 

[berg80]

You want tyranny, not democracy.

The opposite is true. Why don't you want a majority to have control over policies affecting them?

 

[berg80]

and each state equally represented.

Not the citizens of those states.

 

[Auld Phart]

How you them is factually inaccurate. AL wasn't a state until 1819.

whoopie

NY vs RI then.

 

[Auld Phart]

The opposite is true. Why don't you want a majority to have control over policies affecting them?

Why don't you want a majority to have control over policies affecting them?

That's the Houses job.

The Senate represents the states.

 

[berg80]

The roughly 60M residents of NY and CA are represented by 4 senators. The same can be said for the roughly 3.6M residents of WY and IO. How is that democratic?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I want the Senate to more closely represent the views of the vast majority of Americans.

Who’s gonna produce the food? The majority can’t.
It’s mentalities like yours that inspired the constitution.

 

[berg80]

whoopie

NY vs RI then.

You understand there were no organized political parties when the Constitution was ratified, right? Therefore, no chance of fractured partisan politics like we have now. Getting the picture? Probably not.

 

[Auld Phart]

The roughly 60M residents of NY and CA are represented by 4 senators. The same can be said for the roughly 3.6M residents of WY and IO. How is that democratic?

The roughly 60M residents of NY and CA are represented by 4 senators

because the house is based on population. the senate is based on states, equally.

 

[berg80]

Who’s gonna produce the food? The majority can’t.
It’s mentalities like yours that inspired the constitution.

Gosh, that was........well.........I really shouldn't say so as not to be insulting. Have a nice day.

 

[Auld Phart]

You understand there were no organized political parties when the Constitution was ratified, right? Therefore, no chance of fractured partisan politics like we have now. Getting the picture? Probably not.

How is that democratic

 

[berg80]

because the house is based on population. the senate is based on states, equally.

You said that already. It doesn't change how grossly under represented the residents of large states are in the Senate. And since the House can effectively negate anything the Senate does................................

 

[Blaster]

I want the Senate to more closely represent the views of the vast majority of Americans.

Then there would be no Democrats in the Senate.

 

[berg80]

You'll have to do better than a cartoon. If you can.

 

[berg80]

Then there would be no Democrats in the Senate.

Do some research on the positions of a majority of Americans on the aforementioned issues and get back to me.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

My plan is to have a majority of Americans rule federal policy.

My plan is to secede from you tyrannical narcissists.

 

[Auld Phart]

You said that already. It doesn't change how grossly under represented the residents of large states are in the Senate. And since the House can effectively negate anything the Senate does................................

You said that already

and I'll keep saying it til it gets thru your thick skull.

 

[berg80]

Who’s gonna produce the food? The majority can’t.
It’s mentalities like yours that inspired the constitution.

So you think the organizing principle of the Constitution was agriculture? You know this was before commercial farming, right?

 

[berg80]

My plan is to secede from you tyrannical narcissists.

Don't let the door.........................

 

[berg80]

and I'll keep saying it til it gets thru your thick skull.

I have no problem understanding what you are saying. It's just that it's horseshit.