Six Wisconsin recall elections tonight

[Missourian]

You said it was out of the total votes cast today. There were 6 elections.

Lighten up Francis...it was humor...a play on Chris' 9000 record temperature posts.

Go back and read the original post you quoted and all will be clear.

Ha



ha



so funny

I get it, nothing's very funny when something you care deeply about gets defeated. Been there.

I don't want anyone to think I'm gloating with my posts to Chris.

Chris and I just like to rattle each others cages.

I didn't have a dog in this race.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Learn how to read, spidey. I said the incumbents won by more votes combined than Chrissypoo's 9,000 record temperatures. I showed just one race that beat that total.

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

OK, Mr Spiderman Tuba, if you want me to show how stupid you are, here it is.

I'm stupid just because I don't take your word for something?
You must think an awful lot of yourself.

Dist 2 - (R) 27543 - (D) 28039
Dist 8 - (R) 39471 - (D) 34096
Dist 10 -(R) 37099 - (D) 27250
Dist 14 -(R) 26554 - (D) 24365
Dist 18 -(R) 26937 - (D) 28188
Dist 32 -(R) 26724 - (D) 33192

That makes the final score (R) 184328 - (D) 165130

A spread of 19,198, over twice Chrissylumps 9,000 record temperatures.

Care to play again?

Again? That's it? What does it have to do with 9,000 record temperatures? You have yet to tie that in.

 

[CaféAuLait]

You said it was out of the total votes cast today. There were 6 elections.

Learn how to read, spidey. I said the incumbents won by more votes combined than Chrissypoo's 9,000 record temperatures. I showed just one race that beat that total.

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

Cowles , Robert (i) GOP 27,543 60%
Nusbaum , Nancy Dem 18,039 40%

Darling , Alberta (i) GOP 34,840 54%
Pasch , Sandra Dem 29,821 46%

Harsdorf , Sheila (i) GOP 37,099 58%
Moore , Shelly Dem 27,250 42%

Olsen , Luther (i) GOP 26,554 52%
Clark , Fred Dem 24,365 48%

King , Jessica Dem 28,188 51%
Hopper , Randy (i) GOP 26,937 49%

Shilling , Jennifer Dem 33,192 55%
Kapanke , Dan (i) GOP 26,724 45%


Vote difference in order as they appear above

Red GOP

Blue DNC

9450
5019
9849
2189


1251
6468

Difference in GOP favor: 18788

 

[Chris]

Learn how to read, spidey. I said the incumbents won by more votes combined than Chrissypoo's 9,000 record temperatures. I showed just one race that beat that total.

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

OK, Mr Spiderman Tuba, if you want me to show how stupid you are, here it is.

Dist 2 - (R) 27543 - (D) 18039
Dist 8 - (R) 39471 - (D) 34096
Dist 10 -(R) 37099 - (D) 27250
Dist 14 -(R) 26554 - (D) 24365
Dist 18 -(R) 26937 - (D) 28188
Dist 32 -(R) 26724 - (D) 33192

That makes the final score (R) 184328 - (D) 165130

A spread of 19,198, over twice Chrissylumps 9,000 record temperatures.

Care to play again?

Oh, we are going to play again.

Bye, bye, Scott Walker.....

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Lighten up Francis...it was humor...a play on Chris' 9000 record temperature posts.

Go back and read the original post you quoted and all will be clear.

Ha



ha



so funny

I get it, nothing's very funny when something you care deeply about gets defeated. Been there.

No - something's not funny when it relies on something so obscure that no one knows what the fuck you're talking about - like some post on a message board in another thread.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

OK, Mr Spiderman Tuba, if you want me to show how stupid you are, here it is.

I'm stupid just because I don't take your word for something?
You must think an awful lot of yourself.

Dist 2 - (R) 27543 - (D) 28039
Dist 8 - (R) 39471 - (D) 34096
Dist 10 -(R) 37099 - (D) 27250
Dist 14 -(R) 26554 - (D) 24365
Dist 18 -(R) 26937 - (D) 28188
Dist 32 -(R) 26724 - (D) 33192

That makes the final score (R) 184328 - (D) 165130

A spread of 19,198, over twice Chrissylumps 9,000 record temperatures.

Care to play again?

Again? That's it? What does it have to do with 9,000 record temperatures? You have yet to tie that in.

You have yet to read the post that started this.

 

[Chris]

Learn how to read, spidey. I said the incumbents won by more votes combined than Chrissypoo's 9,000 record temperatures. I showed just one race that beat that total.

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

Cowles , Robert (i) GOP 27,543 60%
Nusbaum , Nancy Dem 18,039 40%

Darling , Alberta (i) GOP 34,840 54%
Pasch , Sandra Dem 29,821 46%

Harsdorf , Sheila (i) GOP 37,099 58%
Moore , Shelly Dem 27,250 42%

Olsen , Luther (i) GOP 26,554 52%
Clark , Fred Dem 24,365 48%

King , Jessica Dem 28,188 51%
Hopper , Randy (i) GOP 26,937 49%

Shilling , Jennifer Dem 33,192 55%
Kapanke , Dan (i) GOP 26,724 45%


Vote difference in order as they appear above:

9450
5019
9849
2189


1251
6468

Difference in GOP favor: 18788

Sorry, plus two in the Dems favor.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

Learn how to read, spidey. I said the incumbents won by more votes combined than Chrissypoo's 9,000 record temperatures. I showed just one race that beat that total.

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

Cowles , Robert (i) GOP 27,543 60%
Nusbaum , Nancy Dem 18,039 40%

Darling , Alberta (i) GOP 34,840 54%
Pasch , Sandra Dem 29,821 46%

Harsdorf , Sheila (i) GOP 37,099 58%
Moore , Shelly Dem 27,250 42%

Olsen , Luther (i) GOP 26,554 52%
Clark , Fred Dem 24,365 48%

King , Jessica Dem 28,188 51%
Hopper , Randy (i) GOP 26,937 49%

Shilling , Jennifer Dem 33,192 55%
Kapanke , Dan (i) GOP 26,724 45%


Vote difference in order as they appear above

Red GOP

Blue DNC

9450
5019
9849
2189


1251
6468

Difference in GOP favor: 18788

OK. Got that. Now tie it in to what ever the fuck it has to do with 9,000 temperatures.

 

[OohPooPahDoo]

OK, Mr Spiderman Tuba, if you want me to show how stupid you are, here it is.

I'm stupid just because I don't take your word for something?
You must think an awful lot of yourself.

Dist 2 - (R) 27543 - (D) 28039
Dist 8 - (R) 39471 - (D) 34096
Dist 10 -(R) 37099 - (D) 27250
Dist 14 -(R) 26554 - (D) 24365
Dist 18 -(R) 26937 - (D) 28188
Dist 32 -(R) 26724 - (D) 33192

That makes the final score (R) 184328 - (D) 165130

A spread of 19,198, over twice Chrissylumps 9,000 record temperatures.

Care to play again?

Again? That's it? What does it have to do with 9,000 record temperatures? You have yet to tie that in.

You have yet to read the post that started this.

Or what?

 

[Rat in the Hat]

For the reading challenged tuba boy...

"You" didn't win enough to matter.

It seems the voters in 4 districts were quite content with their senators.

Maybe if they had more pissed off people than your record warmer temperatures, it might have made a difference.

Oh, wait. The challengers lost by more than a combined 9,000 votes.

 

[CaféAuLait]

OK. But the two races the Republicans lost would subtract from that total. You didn't show that.

Cowles , Robert (i) GOP 27,543 60%
Nusbaum , Nancy Dem 18,039 40%

Darling , Alberta (i) GOP 34,840 54%
Pasch , Sandra Dem 29,821 46%

Harsdorf , Sheila (i) GOP 37,099 58%
Moore , Shelly Dem 27,250 42%

Olsen , Luther (i) GOP 26,554 52%
Clark , Fred Dem 24,365 48%

King , Jessica Dem 28,188 51%
Hopper , Randy (i) GOP 26,937 49%

Shilling , Jennifer Dem 33,192 55%
Kapanke , Dan (i) GOP 26,724 45%


Vote difference in order as they appear above

Red GOP

Blue DNC

9450
5019
9849
2189


1251
6468

Difference in GOP favor: 18788

OK. Got that. Now tie it in to what ever the fuck it has to do with 9,000 temperatures.

It's a meme that was oft repeated.

More than 9,000 heat records broken or tied in July, 2011 (MAP) - StormWatch 7 | WJLA.com

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Cowles , Robert (i) GOP 27,543 60%
Nusbaum , Nancy Dem 18,039 40%

Darling , Alberta (i) GOP 34,840 54%
Pasch , Sandra Dem 29,821 46%

Harsdorf , Sheila (i) GOP 37,099 58%
Moore , Shelly Dem 27,250 42%

Olsen , Luther (i) GOP 26,554 52%
Clark , Fred Dem 24,365 48%

King , Jessica Dem 28,188 51%
Hopper , Randy (i) GOP 26,937 49%

Shilling , Jennifer Dem 33,192 55%
Kapanke , Dan (i) GOP 26,724 45%


Vote difference in order as they appear above

Red GOP

Blue DNC

9450
5019
9849
2189


1251
6468

Difference in GOP favor: 18788

OK. Got that. Now tie it in to what ever the fuck it has to do with 9,000 temperatures.

It's a meme that was oft repeated.

More than 9,000 heat records broken or tied in July, 2011 (MAP) - StormWatch 7 | WJLA.com

And this one.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/environment/179308-9-000-record-high-temps-set-in-july.html

 

[Missourian]

I'm stupid just because I don't take your word for something?
You must think an awful lot of yourself.



Again? That's it? What does it have to do with 9,000 record temperatures? You have yet to tie that in.

You have yet to read the post that started this.

Or what?

​

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You have yet to read the post that started this.

Or what?

​

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Missourian again

I owe you some, neighbor.

 

[SFC Ollie]

So, was it worth it? Was it really "fair?" Was this all based on policy that was given no time to mature? What I'm asking is, this was more or the the "heat" of it all and from what I saw it looks like if more time were given it could have been possible no seats would have been lost... Is that not a heavy Dem state anyways? Maybe I'm worng.

Depends how you define worth it. After all, the voters got to speak their mind and two races had results that changed something.

Two more could change next week for a total of 4.

Come on Modbert, the voters had spoken last November, and this BS started because the Unions were pissed just 3 months after the newly elected took office.......This is simply a reconfirmation of what they voted for. So the Unions bought 2 seats, wasn't enough..........Nothing changes....... Now we'll see if the policies will work or not....

 

[WillowTree]

So, was it worth it? Was it really "fair?" Was this all based on policy that was given no time to mature? What I'm asking is, this was more or the the "heat" of it all and from what I saw it looks like if more time were given it could have been possible no seats would have been lost... Is that not a heavy Dem state anyways? Maybe I'm worng.

Depends how you define worth it. After all, the voters got to speak their mind and two races had results that changed something.

Two more could change next week for a total of 4.

Come on Modbert, the voters had spoken last November, and this BS started because the Unions were pissed just 3 months after the newly elected took office.......This is simply a reconfirmation of what they voted for. So the Unions bought 2 seats, wasn't enough..........Nothing changes....... Now we'll see if the policies will work or not....

Unions being thugs. what else?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The comical denial of facts by a couple IDIOTS in this thread is sheer joy to witness. Makes me really excited for 2012.

We won 2/6, we have a secret power that makes that mean something but we can't tell you what! Lulz

 

[Chris]

The comical denial of facts by a couple IDIOTS in this thread is sheer joy to witness. Makes me really excited for 2012.

We won 2/6, we have a secret power that makes that mean something but we can't tell you what! Lulz

Sorry Grampa, you lost two seats.

You will lose more than that in 2012...

 

[Chris]

In what may be the result of one of the great political miscalculations of our time, Scott Walker’s popularity in his home state is fast going down the tubes.

A Rasmussen poll out today reveals that almost 60% of likely Wisconsin voters now disapprove of their aggressive governor’s performance, with 48% strongly disapproving.

While these numbers are clearly indicators of a strategy gone horribly wrong, there are some additional findings in the poll that I suspect deserve even greater attention.

It turns out that the state’s public school teachers are very popular with their fellow Badgers. With 77% of those polled holding a high opinion of their educators, it is not particularly surprising that only 32% among households with children in the public school system approve of the governor’s performance. Sixty-seven percent (67%) disapprove, including 54% who strongly disapprove.

Can anyone imagine a politician succeeding with numbers like this among people who have kids?

Gov. Scott Walker Has Lost The War - Forbes

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

In what may be the result of one of the great political miscalculations of our time, Scott Walker’s popularity in his home state is fast going down the tubes.

A Rasmussen poll out today reveals that almost 60% of likely Wisconsin voters now disapprove of their aggressive governor’s performance, with 48% strongly disapproving.

While these numbers are clearly indicators of a strategy gone horribly wrong, there are some additional findings in the poll that I suspect deserve even greater attention.

It turns out that the state’s public school teachers are very popular with their fellow Badgers. With 77% of those polled holding a high opinion of their educators, it is not particularly surprising that only 32% among households with children in the public school system approve of the governor’s performance. Sixty-seven percent (67%) disapprove, including 54% who strongly disapprove.

Can anyone imagine a politician succeeding with numbers like this among people who have kids?

Gov. Scott Walker Has Lost The War - Forbes

Hate to break it to you but he already got the most important part of his legislation passed. By the time his tenure is up the money and jobs saved will prove his position correct. The recall is over, he and his party weathered it retaining control. If your party with all that money couldn't muster a significant change while the heat of the fire was still hot you got nothing. Americans vote their wallets and if his policies prove fruitful you got no hope.

You may now return to the beach and stick your head back in the sand where it belongs. Facts are not kind to your type.