SJW's have ruined Movies/TVseries

[Dragonlady]

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

In the latest Captain America movie, the Captain is a woman. As she is in the original comic books.

 

[Godboy]

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

In the latest Captain America movie, the Captain is a woman. As she is in the original comic books.

Yeah, those writers are SUPER woke.

 

[BlueGin]

The entire concept of this conversation has escaped you.

Not at all. We have a group of people that are so consumed by politics that everything they do is seen through the lense of politics, and as such they see the boogieman behind everything.

It is a shitty way to live, but I guess it is all you people have.

So you blame the people watching (or not) the show for being too political. But not the people making the show. The ones actually putting their political views in the production aren’t the problem it’s those that decide not to watch their SJW/woke bullshit.

That is both as stupid and at the same time expected from you left wingers.

You are seeing things that do not exist, you are seeing boogiemen because you have been programmed to see them. You see a brown person or a gay person and think "Oh my god, look what they are doing".

I mean fuck, one of the people in this thread has counted the number of gay sex scenes in the show Game of Thrones, while most of the world does not even notice.

I do want to get back to your premise here and it really is the basis of the entire left.

It’s not us that’s the problem. it’s you that’s the problem.

It’s not our crazy left worthless candidates running for office, it’s you voters.

It’s not the creepy mentally unstable transvestite, it’s you.

It’s not the stupidity of all girls Ghost Busters, it’s you.

It’s not the Oscars going fuck all nuts about cow abuse, it’s you.

It’s not us making white/male 007 a black woman, it’s you.

It’s not us making a super hero a queer, it’s you.

It’s not us making up 98 genders when there are clearly only two, it’s you.

This is the new communist democrats that want to control your life from cradle to grave. It’s not them, it’s you for not putting up with it.

Yes, it is you.

You see, nobody but a sexist cares about an all girls Ghost Busters, nobody but a homophobe cares about a gay super hero, there is nothing about 007 that requires it to be a white male.

The most ironic part of this is that your counterparts on the left are doing the same kind of bitching about Hollywood. Not enough of this and not enough of that.

You wingnuts are the same, matters not which side you are on.

007 is required to be a white male because the guy that wrote the character created him that way. Did he give Hollywood permission to culturally appropriate the character and story?

the all female Ghostbusters sucked. Not because it was all women...but because it was stupid and unfunny. A disgrace to the source material actually.

 

[BlueGin]

The all girls Ghostbusters bombed. Ocean`s 8 bombed. Gay superheroes bombed. 007 was conceived as a white Male by his creator. That no one cares is the whole point. They didn't care enough to see these movies. The ones who make this unentertaining drivel don't care. They believe if they keep making drivel the public will eventually give in.

The all girls Ghostbusters was a terrible script, had notihng to do with the girls.

Every Ocean's movie has done progressively worse since the first, based upon the budget to make the movie, 8 did better than 12 or 13.

What gay superheroes bombed?

Yes, 007 was conceived as a white Male by his creator. And that has now gotten old and stale, thus they are trying something different.

No. Joe they aren't. The black woman as 007 is designed to be a one off. There will be a new, make, James Bond. Evidently no one wants to tinker with the franchise.

Gay superheroes.
20 superheroes you probably didn't know were LGBT

It's the lack of imagination. The SJW cannot come up with original stories or characters. They must endlessly reprocess all prior success into the new package where everyone is non white, gay, bi or at least trans or some combination thereof.

Until then these studios will continue to lose money.

They have to gender swap established characters and re write the past because the goal is to destroy culturally established male hero’s.

see Luke Skywalker,John Connor and Spock.

plus they can’t write good characters...especially women ,gays or POC’s because they aren’t allowed to be flawed.

See Captain Marvel.

 

[BlueGin]

WHY THE FUCK WOULD FILM PRODUCERS ALIENATE MORE THAN HALF THEIR BASE

You lying LOSERS are nowhere near half their base, you are just a tiny LOUD mouthed MINORITY in America.

Must be why only a small portion of their movies are making money. And also why they now depend so heavily on China’s box office

 

[Dragonlady]

Not at all. We have a group of people that are so consumed by politics that everything they do is seen through the lense of politics, and as such they see the boogieman behind everything.

It is a shitty way to live, but I guess it is all you people have.

So you blame the people watching (or not) the show for being too political. But not the people making the show. The ones actually putting their political views in the production aren’t the problem it’s those that decide not to watch their SJW/woke bullshit.

That is both as stupid and at the same time expected from you left wingers.

You are seeing things that do not exist, you are seeing boogiemen because you have been programmed to see them. You see a brown person or a gay person and think "Oh my god, look what they are doing".

I mean fuck, one of the people in this thread has counted the number of gay sex scenes in the show Game of Thrones, while most of the world does not even notice.

I do want to get back to your premise here and it really is the basis of the entire left.

It’s not us that’s the problem. it’s you that’s the problem.

It’s not our crazy left worthless candidates running for office, it’s you voters.

It’s not the creepy mentally unstable transvestite, it’s you.

It’s not the stupidity of all girls Ghost Busters, it’s you.

It’s not the Oscars going fuck all nuts about cow abuse, it’s you.

It’s not us making white/male 007 a black woman, it’s you.

It’s not us making a super hero a queer, it’s you.

It’s not us making up 98 genders when there are clearly only two, it’s you.

This is the new communist democrats that want to control your life from cradle to grave. It’s not them, it’s you for not putting up with it.

Yes, it is you.

You see, nobody but a sexist cares about an all girls Ghost Busters, nobody but a homophobe cares about a gay super hero, there is nothing about 007 that requires it to be a white male.

The most ironic part of this is that your counterparts on the left are doing the same kind of bitching about Hollywood. Not enough of this and not enough of that.

You wingnuts are the same, matters not which side you are on.

007 is required to be a white male because the guy that wrote the character created him that way. Did he give Hollywood permission to culturally appropriate the character and story?

the all female Ghostbusters sucked. Not because it was all women...but because it was stupid and unfunny. A disgrace to the source material actually.

Ian Fleming is dead. 007 can be modified in any way their rights agreement says it can be. None of the movies bore any relationship to the books whose titles and characters they appropriated. So Fleming must not have cared much what they did to the books.

You Only Live Twice, the book, set in Japan, was all about a "suicide garden" where all the plants and animals were deadly. Built the garden in Japan because of the Japanese customs of ritual suicide. When Bond realizes that Ernst Blofeld is behind the garden, he sets out to kill him to avenge Blofeld's murder of his wife (Casino Royale)

You only live twice, the movie, was about American and Russian space capsules being stolen, with each thinking the other was responsible, and the world coming to the brink of nuclear war because of it. Not the same story at all.

I figure Fleming didn't much care, as long as the cheques cleared.

 

[Lysistrata]

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

First off, I don't understand who "Traditional Americans" are, what defines them, and what connection they have, if any, to "White Americans." As an American who is white, I wonder how I would be "targeted." Do I need to develop some sort of attraction to buff shirtless white guys spraying bullets? (I'll keep the buff shirtless white guys, but leave out the bullets). Do I need a "white-over" with someone teaching me how to be white like Richard Pryor taught Gene Wilder how to be black in Silver Streak?

At the most, what I get from your comment is that you want some sort of quota system in which anyone who makes a movie starring a black "hero" must then make multiple movies starring a white "hero" in which all female and black characters (if any) must conform to rigid racist and sexist stereotypes to somehow compensate. You have some sort of thing about race. What you seem to be complaining about is the appearance of non-white, non-heterosexual characters and female characters who are not submissive.

I haven't seen the movies that you discussed. Superhero movies aren't my thing. Actually, I don't watch many movies, but I do like drama and suspense. Some of my favorites that are not comedies are Shawshank Redemption, Zero Dark Thirty, True Blood, Game of Thrones, Fargo, Hunt for Red October, The Abyss.

 

[BlueGin]

But the topic of this thread is entertainment

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Because they think the 20 trolls that spam twitter all day from mommy’s basement with PC propaganda represent more of the general public than they do. They are learning otherwise.

 

[Dragonlady]

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

First off, I don't understand who "Traditional Americans" are, what defines them, and what connection they have, if any, to "White Americans." As an American who is white, I wonder how I would be "targeted." Do I need to develop some sort of attraction to buff shirtless white guys spraying bullets? (I'll keep the buff shirtless white guys, but leave out the bullets). Do I need a "white-over" with someone teaching me how to be white like Richard Pryor taught Gene Wilder how to be black in Silver Streak?

At the most, what I get from your comment is that you want some sort of quota system in which anyone who makes a movie starring a black "hero" must then make multiple movies starring a white "hero" in which all female and black characters (if any) must conform to rigid racist and sexist stereotypes to somehow compensate. You have some sort of thing about race. What you seem to be complaining about is the appearance of non-white, non-heterosexual characters and female characters who are not submissive.

I haven't seen the movies that you discussed. Superhero movies aren't my thing. Actually, I don't watch many movies, but I do like drama and suspense. Some of my favorites that are not comedies are Shawshank Redemption, Zero Dark Thirty, True Blood, Game of Thrones, Fargo, Hunt for Red October, The Abyss.

You and I have similar tastes.

How are blacks not "traditional Americans"? The first blacks landed in Virginia in 1619, more than 150 years before the Declaration of Independence. They formed 19% of the American population at the start of the Civil War. We know this because the first Census was taken in 1860.

Native Americans are the real "traditional Americans", and they're hardly represented at all in the movies.

 

[Montrovant]

They are not sacrificing half their profits, you triggered snowflakes do not make up half the population, you are a tiny percent of it

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors.

What is or is not entertainment is subjective. To claim that inserting "political propaganda" is abusing their position is, frankly, ludicrous. There has been political commentary put in film from the very beginning. Authors put it in fiction. Musicians put it in their lyrics. Your argument seems to be that entertainers are only allowed to be creative in ways that you approve of.

 

[Montrovant]

rush limbaugh has a constitutional right to slip propaganda into his program 3 hours a day and into every page of his books

fox news, ann coulter, michelle malkin, bill oreilly, sean hannity all have a constitutional right to slip conservative propaganda into their programs

conservative movie makes have a right to slip conservative propaganda into their films.....

only a fascist nazi piece of crap would want to deny liberals the same constitutional right.

It's well known that when you turn on Fox news, CNN, MSNBC or Rush that the program is going to be political. It is also going to repulse a large portion of the US population.

These programs have political target audiences, and aim to derive and maximize their profits from the audience of whom they target.


At no point in this thread did I say film producers "dont have the right to insert their viewpoints."

But as supposedly non-political commercial entities, it makes no sense for them to forcefully insert so many far left SJW themes into their productions, driving away half the US population (if not more than half). And thus it must be assumed that another entity is underwriting these potential profit losses.

How Underwriters Assess the Risk of Insurers

Inasmuch as it actually is intentionally done, just because inserting political views into film might not make sense to you, doesn't mean it makes no sense.

Also, your argument about "driving away half the US population" sounds silly. You have not, that I am aware, provided any actual evidence that such is the case.

 

[Montrovant]

Bear in mind (I know this quote is from between you and another poster) that I have never demanded anything of these film producers.

I do however find their self impoverishing choices to be very strange. I cannot find any rational or logical reason for why they would purposely devalue most of their own products ... unless another entity is paying for the devaluation.

They are not self impoverishing choices, you give yourself and your fellow snowflakes far too much credit, there just really is not that many of you on either side.

They are.

They've taken some really good films and scenes and ruined them with immersion breaking SJW shit. Star Wars I Phantom Menace would have been awesome without Jar Jar Binks (immersion breaking); just as Star Wars Last Jedi would have been awesome without all the SJW bullshit.

No, Phantom Menace would absolutely NOT have been awesome without Jar-Jar. I might have been watchable, but definitely not awesome. That movie had so many problems; Jar-Jar was just the worst of them.

 

[Montrovant]

They are not self impoverishing choices, you give yourself and your fellow snowflakes far too much credit, there just really is not that many of you on either side.

Why do you think that Black Panther made so much money?

Because it was a really well made movie with a good story line.

Bullshit. It sucked. But it pandered to a ethnic group that likes to spend money and spent a lot of money seeing it over and over again.

it was a great movie, one of the better superhero movies ever. That you think it sucks is all on you, and not on the movie.

i guess there were too many black people for you in it.,

Wow. YOu made it about race. What a shocker. I am shocked. Shocked.


It sucked. The story was weak as shit. They failed to explain, pretty much everything about Wakanda. They tried to have a fusion of high tech and ancient african culture, which was brave, but they failed, they pandered shamelessly to racist black nationalism, insulting the intelligence of their target audience by doing it badly.

But they made a shit load of money, because they pandered to what their audience wanted to see.


How much money do you think they could have made, if they had did something similar but to a much larger group? Only not without being shit?

Black Panther is the 12th highest grossing movie of all time, so....probably not much more.

 

[Correll]

Are you saying that only black people are allowed to admire Black Panther?

I am saying that is why conservatives hate it so much

I've heard very few conservatives talk about it. None that have, had stated that.


SO, you are just talking shit. Like normal.

You go to more klan meetings than I do

YOu are really quite the asshole online. YOu must be very different in real life, huh?

Your affiliation with elements of the klan is well known.

Your saying shit you can't back up, and being a coward, is well know.


I like that you did not even deny being very different in real life. I guess there are limits to how stupid you want to look.

 

[Correll]

I've heard very few conservatives talk about it. None that have, had stated that.


SO, you are just talking shit. Like normal.

You go to more klan meetings than I do

YOu are really quite the asshole online. YOu must be very different in real life, huh?

Name-calling again.

You do agree that rw deserved it, do you not?

I have my best people looking into your klan affiliation. They cannot believe what they are finding

Have you ever spoken like this to someone in real life, and what does it mean that you only are an asshole, when you are online?

 

[Correll]

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

But the topic of this thread is entertainment

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

Show reality. 95 pound women beating the crap out of buffed former special forces guys is quite a push. you are questioning people who question. As long as I know who does the dirty work needed to keep everything going that is what counts. And it ain't you.

I have heard of studies on how women cops have to escalate violence a lot faster, then male cops who can actually physically subdue male criminals.


It does raise an interesting question. Has there been any studies done on how well female cops are doing? We've had a couple decades with large numbers of female officers, so we should have the data.


Has anyone dared to collect it and look at it? Or don't we do stuff like that anymore as a society?

 

[Correll]

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

But the topic of this thread is entertainment

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

the INCELs sure do take these movies personally.

That your only answer is to personally attack the poster, shows that A you can't challenge his point, and B. that you are an asshole.

 

[Correll]

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

the INCELs sure do take these movies personally.

Living vicariously through fantasy role play is all they have.

Says the woman with 21 thousand posts.

 

[rightwinger]

These Are The 2019 Movies That Most Divided Critics & Fans, According To Rotten Tomatoes

Interesting, audiences loved some really terrible movies. Anna was an awful movie and it got an audience rating of 81%

These Are The 2019 Movies That Most Divided Critics & Fans, According To Rotten Tomatoes

Interesting, audiences loved some really terrible movies. Anna was an awful movie and it got an audience rating of 81%

One of the worst movies ever in my view was American Beauty...it won the OSCAR for best picture

There have been a lot of stinkers as best picture in recent years

Shape of Water?

 

[rightwinger]

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

Show reality. 95 pound women beating the crap out of buffed former special forces guys is quite a push. you are questioning people who question. As long as I know who does the dirty work needed to keep everything going that is what counts. And it ain't you.

I have heard of studies on how women cops have to escalate violence a lot faster, then male cops who can actually physically subdue male criminals.


It does raise an interesting question. Has there been any studies done on how well female cops are doing? We've had a couple decades with large numbers of female officers, so we should have the data.


Has anyone dared to collect it and look at it? Or don't we do stuff like that anymore as a society?

I hear the opposite where female cops are more likely to de escalate a situation and relieve tension

Male cops are more likely to pound heads