SJW's have ruined Movies/TVseries

[The Original Tree]

Too bad our wonderful President isn't putting an end to the SJW culture the way Hitler did to the twisted Weimar culture.

I can sympathize with the German people of the era getting fed up with the wantonness of the time.

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Dude, you are a Commie Tard, God Hating DemNazi. Everything you post is a lie because you are all Deranged and Insane because God cursed you for being a Hateful Retard.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

The Parallels are between Hitlery Von Cankles McPutin and Hitler.

Just like we compare you to Joseph Goebells.

Don't be sad little DemNazi. After Jesus comes for The Church and removes them from Earth and The 21 End Time Plagues Come, you and Bernie will actually be allowed to Behead People with your Guillotines. You'll accept The Mark of Anti-Christ, The Lefty Messiah, and then on Judgment Day after Armageddon, you will go to Hell, and burn there with Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton too.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Too bad our wonderful President isn't putting an end to the SJW culture the way Hitler did to the twisted Weimar culture.

I can sympathize with the German people of the era getting fed up with the wantonness of the time.

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Dude, you are a Commie Tard, God Hating DemNazi. Everything you post is a lie because you are all Deranged and Insane because God cursed you for being a Hateful Retard.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

The Parallels are between Hitlery Von Cankles McPutin and Hitler.

Just like we compare you to Joseph Goebells.

Don't be sad little DemNazi. After Jesus comes for The Church and removes them from Earth and The 21 End Time Plagues Come, you and Bernie will actually be allowed to Behead People with your Guillotines. You'll accept The Mark of Anti-Christ, The Lefty Messiah, and then on Judgment Day after Armageddon, you will go to Hell, and burn there with Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton too.

There are not 21 end time plagues, your Russian to English translation program glitched again

 

[Correll]

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

No, that has never been the topic of this thread.

The topic of this thread is why would film producers sacrifice more than half their profits/revenues for political purposes?

Companies don't exist to lose money, they exist to maximize profit.

I want to know know who is covering their loss of 1/2 their potential revenue.

Stop trying to hijack and redefine my OP and poll.

ty.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

Show reality. 95 pound women beating the crap out of buffed former special forces guys is quite a push. you are questioning people who question. As long as I know who does the dirty work needed to keep everything going that is what counts. And it ain't you.

Hmmmm.... the point of most Hollywood movies is (giggle) probably not to depict reality. Not a lot of box office in watching the unremarkable and mundane.

Well, that is wrong on two levels.


1. Reality can have drama. Thus realistic stories can have drama.

2. Even if the story itself has an unrealistic setting or elements, having the people react to those elements realistically, creates an illusion of "realism" and can help get the viewer invested in the story and characters.

 

[Correll]

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

1. It could be that in the modern political climate, that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.


2. The terms are changing as America changes. I used both to signify that point.

3. My point was that Captain America COULD have been used to pander to a certain target audience like Black Panther was used. Black Panther outperformed Captain America, despite being a far worse movie, and targeting a minority population. If similar tactics were used aimed at a viewer pool that was five times larger...

 

[The Original Tree]

7 seal Judgments
7 trumpet judgments
7 bowl judgments.

What are the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls in the Book of Revelation? | GotQuestions.org

Question: "What are the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls (vials) in the Book of Revelation?"

Answer: The seven seals (Revelation 6:1–17; 8:1–5), seven trumpets (Revelation 8:6–9:21; 11:15–19), and seven bowls/vials (Revelation 16:1–21) are three series of end-times judgments from God. The judgments get increasingly worse and more devastating as the end times progress. The seven seals, trumpets, and bowls are connected to one another. The seventh seal introduces the seven trumpets (Revelation 8:1–5), and the seventh trumpet introduces the seven bowls (Revelation 11:15–19; 15:1–8).

The seven seals include the appearance of the Antichrist (Revelation 6:1–2), great warfare (Revelation 6:3–4), famine (Revelation 6:5–6), plague (Revelation 6:7–8), the martyrdom of believers in Christ (Revelation 6:9–11), a devastating earthquake causing terrible devastation, and astronomical upheaval (Revelation 6:12–14). Those who survive the six seals are right to cry out, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?” (Revelation 6:16–17).

The seventh seal introduces the seven trumpet judgments. The trumpets include hail and fire that destroy much of the plant life in the world (Revelation 8:7), the death of much of the world’s aquatic life (Revelation 8:8–9; 8:10–11), the darkening of the sun and moon (Revelation 8:12), a plague of “demonic locusts” that torture the unsaved (Revelation 9:1–11), and the march of a demonic army that kills a third of humanity (Revelation 9:12–21).

The seventh trumpet calls forth seven angels who carry the seven bowls of God’s wrath (Revelation 11:15–19; 15:1–8). The bowl judgments include painful sores afflicting humanity (Revelation 16:2), the death of every living thing in the sea (Revelation 16:3), the turning of rivers to blood (Revelation 16:4–7), an intensifying of the sun’s heat (Revelation 16:8–9), great darkness and an intensification of the sores from the first bowl (Revelation 16:10–11), the advance the Antichrist’s armies at Armageddon (Revelation 16:12–14), and a devastating earthquake followed by giant hailstones (Revelation 16:15–21).

Together, the seals, trumpets, and bowls of the end times comprise “the great day of [God’s] wrath” (Revelation 6:17) and serve to judge the Antichrist’s kingdom of wickedness. Revelation 16:5–7declares of God, “You are just in these judgments, you who are and who were, the Holy One, because you have so judged; for they have shed the blood of your saints and prophets, and you have given them blood to drink as they deserve. . . . Yes, Lord God Almighty, true and just are your judgments.”

Too bad our wonderful President isn't putting an end to the SJW culture the way Hitler did to the twisted Weimar culture.

I can sympathize with the German people of the era getting fed up with the wantonness of the time.

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

Dude, you are a Commie Tard, God Hating DemNazi. Everything you post is a lie because you are all Deranged and Insane because God cursed you for being a Hateful Retard.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

The Parallels are between Hitlery Von Cankles McPutin and Hitler.

Just like we compare you to Joseph Goebells.

Don't be sad little DemNazi. After Jesus comes for The Church and removes them from Earth and The 21 End Time Plagues Come, you and Bernie will actually be allowed to Behead People with your Guillotines. You'll accept The Mark of Anti-Christ, The Lefty Messiah, and then on Judgment Day after Armageddon, you will go to Hell, and burn there with Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton too.

There are not 21 end time plagues, your Russian to English translation program glitched again

 

[Correll]

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

First off, I don't understand who "Traditional Americans" are, what defines them, and what connection they have, if any, to "White Americans." As an American who is white, I wonder how I would be "targeted." Do I need to develop some sort of attraction to buff shirtless white guys spraying bullets? (I'll keep the buff shirtless white guys, but leave out the bullets). Do I need a "white-over" with someone teaching me how to be white like Richard Pryor taught Gene Wilder how to be black in Silver Streak?

At the most, what I get from your comment is that you want some sort of quota system in which anyone who makes a movie starring a black "hero" must then make multiple movies starring a white "hero" in which all female and black characters (if any) must conform to rigid racist and sexist stereotypes to somehow compensate. You have some sort of thing about race. What you seem to be complaining about is the appearance of non-white, non-heterosexual characters and female characters who are not submissive.

I haven't seen the movies that you discussed. Superhero movies aren't my thing. Actually, I don't watch many movies, but I do like drama and suspense. Some of my favorites that are not comedies are Shawshank Redemption, Zero Dark Thirty, True Blood, Game of Thrones, Fargo, Hunt for Red October, The Abyss.

1. You asked what could be done to give some balance. I told you one idea. Apply to Captain America the pandering used in Black Panther, but aimed at a far larger audience.


2. Traditional Americans. People that believe in Mom, and Apple Pie and Baseball. You know, Not progressives. It is a general term. YOu know that you could target a movie at them. Don't play pretend.

3. I said nothing of quotas. Save your strawmen for people who might fall for them.

4. You asked a real question. I gave a real answer. Do you have anything to say in response?

 

[Correll]

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

First off, I don't understand who "Traditional Americans" are, what defines them, and what connection they have, if any, to "White Americans." As an American who is white, I wonder how I would be "targeted." Do I need to develop some sort of attraction to buff shirtless white guys spraying bullets? (I'll keep the buff shirtless white guys, but leave out the bullets). Do I need a "white-over" with someone teaching me how to be white like Richard Pryor taught Gene Wilder how to be black in Silver Streak?

At the most, what I get from your comment is that you want some sort of quota system in which anyone who makes a movie starring a black "hero" must then make multiple movies starring a white "hero" in which all female and black characters (if any) must conform to rigid racist and sexist stereotypes to somehow compensate. You have some sort of thing about race. What you seem to be complaining about is the appearance of non-white, non-heterosexual characters and female characters who are not submissive.

I haven't seen the movies that you discussed. Superhero movies aren't my thing. Actually, I don't watch many movies, but I do like drama and suspense. Some of my favorites that are not comedies are Shawshank Redemption, Zero Dark Thirty, True Blood, Game of Thrones, Fargo, Hunt for Red October, The Abyss.

You and I have similar tastes.

How are blacks not "traditional Americans"? ....

Many of them are. But those are not the ones targeted by Black Panther. Black Panther pandered to Black Nationalism.


Any movie that would have a sympathetic character use the term "colonizer", is not pro-American.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

7 seal Judgments
7 trumpet judgments
7 bowl judgments.

What are the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls in the Book of Revelation? | GotQuestions.org

Question: "What are the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls (vials) in the Book of Revelation?"

Answer: The seven seals (Revelation 6:1–17; 8:1–5), seven trumpets (Revelation 8:6–9:21; 11:15–19), and seven bowls/vials (Revelation 16:1–21) are three series of end-times judgments from God. The judgments get increasingly worse and more devastating as the end times progress. The seven seals, trumpets, and bowls are connected to one another. The seventh seal introduces the seven trumpets (Revelation 8:1–5), and the seventh trumpet introduces the seven bowls (Revelation 11:15–19; 15:1–8).

The seven seals include the appearance of the Antichrist (Revelation 6:1–2), great warfare (Revelation 6:3–4), famine (Revelation 6:5–6), plague (Revelation 6:7–8), the martyrdom of believers in Christ (Revelation 6:9–11), a devastating earthquake causing terrible devastation, and astronomical upheaval (Revelation 6:12–14). Those who survive the six seals are right to cry out, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?” (Revelation 6:16–17).

The seventh seal introduces the seven trumpet judgments. The trumpets include hail and fire that destroy much of the plant life in the world (Revelation 8:7), the death of much of the world’s aquatic life (Revelation 8:8–9; 8:10–11), the darkening of the sun and moon (Revelation 8:12), a plague of “demonic locusts” that torture the unsaved (Revelation 9:1–11), and the march of a demonic army that kills a third of humanity (Revelation 9:12–21).

The seventh trumpet calls forth seven angels who carry the seven bowls of God’s wrath (Revelation 11:15–19; 15:1–8). The bowl judgments include painful sores afflicting humanity (Revelation 16:2), the death of every living thing in the sea (Revelation 16:3), the turning of rivers to blood (Revelation 16:4–7), an intensifying of the sun’s heat (Revelation 16:8–9), great darkness and an intensification of the sores from the first bowl (Revelation 16:10–11), the advance the Antichrist’s armies at Armageddon (Revelation 16:12–14), and a devastating earthquake followed by giant hailstones (Revelation 16:15–21).

Together, the seals, trumpets, and bowls of the end times comprise “the great day of [God’s] wrath” (Revelation 6:17) and serve to judge the Antichrist’s kingdom of wickedness. Revelation 16:5–7declares of God, “You are just in these judgments, you who are and who were, the Holy One, because you have so judged; for they have shed the blood of your saints and prophets, and you have given them blood to drink as they deserve. . . . Yes, Lord God Almighty, true and just are your judgments.”

Isn't it a little early for you to start drinking, Tipsy? You just posted that Hilter killed 6 million Jews/gypsies and Catholics to put an end to low morals in the media.

And you have another poster saying that Hitler did it right.

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

The Parallels are between Hitlery Von Cankles McPutin and Hitler.

Just like we compare you to Joseph Goebells.

Don't be sad little DemNazi. After Jesus comes for The Church and removes them from Earth and The 21 End Time Plagues Come, you and Bernie will actually be allowed to Behead People with your Guillotines. You'll accept The Mark of Anti-Christ, The Lefty Messiah, and then on Judgment Day after Armageddon, you will go to Hell, and burn there with Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton too.

There are not 21 end time plagues, your Russian to English translation program glitched again

There are no plagues associated with the opening of the first 5 seals

 

[Correll]

Except, your use of the word "triggered" is a lie.


The fact that you are lying, indicates that you know that the truth is the opposite of your position.

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors.

What is or is not entertainment is subjective. To claim that inserting "political propaganda" is abusing their position is, frankly, ludicrous. There has been political commentary put in film from the very beginning. Authors put it in fiction. Musicians put it in their lyrics. Your argument seems to be that entertainers are only allowed to be creative in ways that you approve of.

If the artistic vision, truly has a political message in it, such as in say... the original Rollerball, with it's anti-corporate message, that in one thing.


BUt if some character just equates watching Fox News with wanting to wage a genocidal war of conquest, for no reason, that is bullshit and someone should have told the writer who wrote it, to save his partisan bile for his personal time. And to be less of an asshole.

 

[Correll]

Why do you think that Black Panther made so much money?

Because it was a really well made movie with a good story line.

Bullshit. It sucked. But it pandered to a ethnic group that likes to spend money and spent a lot of money seeing it over and over again.

it was a great movie, one of the better superhero movies ever. That you think it sucks is all on you, and not on the movie.

i guess there were too many black people for you in it.,

Wow. YOu made it about race. What a shocker. I am shocked. Shocked.


It sucked. The story was weak as shit. They failed to explain, pretty much everything about Wakanda. They tried to have a fusion of high tech and ancient african culture, which was brave, but they failed, they pandered shamelessly to racist black nationalism, insulting the intelligence of their target audience by doing it badly.

But they made a shit load of money, because they pandered to what their audience wanted to see.


How much money do you think they could have made, if they had did something similar but to a much larger group? Only not without being shit?

Black Panther is the 12th highest grossing movie of all time, so....probably not much more.

REally? You think that if instead of pandering to a small minority, that they had instead pandered to a target audience five times bigger, that they could not have earned even more?

AND, my point was not that they had to choose between them, but that they could do BOTH.


BALANCE.


Not just serve one side of the socio-political divide, but both.


They are leaving BILLIONS on the table. BILLIONS.

 

[The Original Tree]

Let’s call Them all Judgments. The word “plague” has many meanings.

You could be plagued with stupidity.

Plagued with financial issues.

Plagued with TDS.

One thing is certain, you don’t want to be left behind for The Tribulation.

Approximately 1/2 The life on Earth perishes, and if you accept The Mark, you are going to Hell, and if you refuse it you will be beheaded.

Not many people will survive these judgments and plagues.

7 seal Judgments
7 trumpet judgments
7 bowl judgments.

What are the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls in the Book of Revelation? | GotQuestions.org

Question: "What are the seven seals, seven trumpets, and seven bowls (vials) in the Book of Revelation?"

Answer: The seven seals (Revelation 6:1–17; 8:1–5), seven trumpets (Revelation 8:6–9:21; 11:15–19), and seven bowls/vials (Revelation 16:1–21) are three series of end-times judgments from God. The judgments get increasingly worse and more devastating as the end times progress. The seven seals, trumpets, and bowls are connected to one another. The seventh seal introduces the seven trumpets (Revelation 8:1–5), and the seventh trumpet introduces the seven bowls (Revelation 11:15–19; 15:1–8).

The seven seals include the appearance of the Antichrist (Revelation 6:1–2), great warfare (Revelation 6:3–4), famine (Revelation 6:5–6), plague (Revelation 6:7–8), the martyrdom of believers in Christ (Revelation 6:9–11), a devastating earthquake causing terrible devastation, and astronomical upheaval (Revelation 6:12–14). Those who survive the six seals are right to cry out, “Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who sits on the throne and from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?” (Revelation 6:16–17).

The seventh seal introduces the seven trumpet judgments. The trumpets include hail and fire that destroy much of the plant life in the world (Revelation 8:7), the death of much of the world’s aquatic life (Revelation 8:8–9; 8:10–11), the darkening of the sun and moon (Revelation 8:12), a plague of “demonic locusts” that torture the unsaved (Revelation 9:1–11), and the march of a demonic army that kills a third of humanity (Revelation 9:12–21).

The seventh trumpet calls forth seven angels who carry the seven bowls of God’s wrath (Revelation 11:15–19; 15:1–8). The bowl judgments include painful sores afflicting humanity (Revelation 16:2), the death of every living thing in the sea (Revelation 16:3), the turning of rivers to blood (Revelation 16:4–7), an intensifying of the sun’s heat (Revelation 16:8–9), great darkness and an intensification of the sores from the first bowl (Revelation 16:10–11), the advance the Antichrist’s armies at Armageddon (Revelation 16:12–14), and a devastating earthquake followed by giant hailstones (Revelation 16:15–21).

Together, the seals, trumpets, and bowls of the end times comprise “the great day of [God’s] wrath” (Revelation 6:17) and serve to judge the Antichrist’s kingdom of wickedness. Revelation 16:5–7declares of God, “You are just in these judgments, you who are and who were, the Holy One, because you have so judged; for they have shed the blood of your saints and prophets, and you have given them blood to drink as they deserve. . . . Yes, Lord God Almighty, true and just are your judgments.”

Hitler preferred to drink water. Ban water.

Hitler built the Autobahn, ban highways.

Hitler was correct about degenerative art.

Get over it.

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.

You should really give upon that whole line of argument.

You should really take your own advice.

The Parallels are between Hitlery Von Cankles McPutin and Hitler.

Just like we compare you to Joseph Goebells.

Don't be sad little DemNazi. After Jesus comes for The Church and removes them from Earth and The 21 End Time Plagues Come, you and Bernie will actually be allowed to Behead People with your Guillotines. You'll accept The Mark of Anti-Christ, The Lefty Messiah, and then on Judgment Day after Armageddon, you will go to Hell, and burn there with Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton too.

There are not 21 end time plagues, your Russian to English translation program glitched again

There are no plagues associated with the opening of the first 5 seals

 

[Harpy Eagle]

he wants 100% conservative propaganda and 0% liberal.

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

1. It could be that in the modern political climate, that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.


2. The terms are changing as America changes. I used both to signify that point.

3. My point was that Captain America COULD have been used to pander to a certain target audience like Black Panther was used. Black Panther outperformed Captain America, despite being a far worse movie, and targeting a minority population. If similar tactics were used aimed at a viewer pool that was five times larger...

1. Or it could be you are a racist that does not like movies about black people with power.

2. If the term changes with time then there is no such thing as a “traditional American”.

3. The target audience for Black Panther was every non-racist super hero movie fan.

 

[Correll]

I am a student of WWII, and I am well aware of what Hitler did, and the many, many frightening parallels between Donald Trump and the rise of Adolf Hitler, which lead directly to WWII, and how similar they are.

I can write an entire thesis on the rise of Hitler, using anger against the Treaty of Versailles to fan the flames of German resentment at being forced to pay reparations to the Allies, bankrupting the German treasury, and blaming the Jews for letting it happen.

To his co-opting of the socialist Nazi Party as his vehicle to the election. Hitler used production of his war machine to employ and enrich the German people, and Make Germany Great Again.

Then he allowed people to attack Jews in public. Made them wear stars so people knew who they were, because you can't always tell just by looking at someone who is Jewish. This is where the USA is now. Attacking and bulling visible minorities is acceptable because they're not "real Americans".

Now he's trying to use the Department of Justice to prosecute his opponents. Shit's getting real.


You should really take your own advice.

Your theory is baseless and worthless. But it is funny. The entertainment industry seems to be doing quite well. This "SJW" shit is just total garbage. You just seem angry with the industry for some reason known only to you, or need to whine about something to get attention.

Most men in rage would beat the shit out of most female cops. And yet they are lofted up into the highest equality platitudes. There are actually civilian guys who help female cops out when in trouble. The added costs to the police departments and less value for the dollar spent is just the start. So the entertainers make it look quite different. We see it everyday. Just one issue.

So your issue is that women should not be cops and they should not be portrayed as cops in movies. Women make very good cops in real life, and certainly very good detectives, which takes brain work.

You just don't want women to be shown on screen unless they are serving coffee or having sex with some guy. I get it.

Show reality. 95 pound women beating the crap out of buffed former special forces guys is quite a push. you are questioning people who question. As long as I know who does the dirty work needed to keep everything going that is what counts. And it ain't you.

I have heard of studies on how women cops have to escalate violence a lot faster, then male cops who can actually physically subdue male criminals.


It does raise an interesting question. Has there been any studies done on how well female cops are doing? We've had a couple decades with large numbers of female officers, so we should have the data.


Has anyone dared to collect it and look at it? Or don't we do stuff like that anymore as a society?

I hear the opposite where female cops are more likely to de escalate a situation and relieve tension

Male cops are more likely to pound heads

Could go either way. A bad guy might be intimidated by a big male cop, while seeing the female as someone he can take.


Or the male cop might just not be prepared to take his shit, while the female cop might want to avoid physical violence, for whatever reason.


Hard data is needed to see which way it is actually trending.

 

[The Original Tree]

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

1. It could be that in the modern political climate, that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.


2. The terms are changing as America changes. I used both to signify that point.

3. My point was that Captain America COULD have been used to pander to a certain target audience like Black Panther was used. Black Panther outperformed Captain America, despite being a far worse movie, and targeting a minority population. If similar tactics were used aimed at a viewer pool that was five times larger...

1. Or it could be you are a racist that does not like movies about black people with power.

2. If the term changes with time then there is no such thing as a “traditional American”.

3. The target audience for Black Panther was every non-racist super hero movie fan.

America has more Black Millionaires and Billionaires than the entire world combined.

 

[Correll]

I would like some balance in the shit that Hollywood puts out.

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

1. It could be that in the modern political climate, that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.


2. The terms are changing as America changes. I used both to signify that point.

3. My point was that Captain America COULD have been used to pander to a certain target audience like Black Panther was used. Black Panther outperformed Captain America, despite being a far worse movie, and targeting a minority population. If similar tactics were used aimed at a viewer pool that was five times larger...

1. Or it could be you are a racist that does not like movies about black people with power.

2. If the term changes with time then there is no such thing as a “traditional American”.

3. The target audience for Black Panther was every non-racist super hero movie fan.

1. I made a real point. Nothing I have said, justifies an accusation of racism. My point stands. It could be that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.



2. Sure there are. They just aren't the super majority they used to be. So, why ignore them as a target audience? Maybe because of partisan political bias in Hollywood?


3. No, the target audience was Black Americans. The rest of the world was welcome to give them money too, but nothing was done for them. Indeed, "colonizers" is insulting the majority of American movie goers.

 

[Desperado]

Because if they are like me they had to google SJW to find out what it meant.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I still question why you continue to watch "the shit that Hollywood puts out," whatever that is. But exactly what would you consider to be "balance" even? What has to be added to provide "balance"?

That is a very good question! THank you for actually asking something, instead of just inventing shit in your head, and then attacking me based on your hallucinations!



Well, a good place to start for balance, in the context of the movies we have discussed,


would have been if the Captain America movies had targeted Traditional Americans/White Americans with the same style of pandering and ego stroking that Black Panther did for Black Americans.


It is worth noting that such a potential viewing population would be nearly 5 times the size of the Black American target audience and could potentially make absolutely stupid amounts of money.


For starters, that would be a good start.

It is just weird how only a few white people had an issue with Black Panther and they are all of the same political leaning.

What did you find lacking in the Captain America movies in regards to Traditional Americans/White Americans (and I will not even get into how you equate those two things)?


By the way, the Captain America movies had a world wide gross revenue of $714,264,267

1. It could be that in the modern political climate, that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.


2. The terms are changing as America changes. I used both to signify that point.

3. My point was that Captain America COULD have been used to pander to a certain target audience like Black Panther was used. Black Panther outperformed Captain America, despite being a far worse movie, and targeting a minority population. If similar tactics were used aimed at a viewer pool that was five times larger...

1. Or it could be you are a racist that does not like movies about black people with power.

2. If the term changes with time then there is no such thing as a “traditional American”.

3. The target audience for Black Panther was every non-racist super hero movie fan.

1. I made a real point. Nothing I have said, justifies an accusation of racism. My point stands. It could be that only a few white people dare to voice criticism of a movie that sucked, but was an Epic of Identity Politics.



2. Sure there are. They just aren't the super majority they used to be. So, why ignore them as a target audience? Maybe because of partisan political bias in Hollywood?


3. No, the target audience was Black Americans. The rest of the world was welcome to give them money too, but nothing was done for them. Indeed, "colonizers" is insulting the majority of American movie goers.

1. I made a suggestion of the probable cause, just as you did.

2. If the definition is ever changing as you said then there really is nothing traditional.

3. And thus my reason for point 1. You see pandering, most do not. You really seem to have a problem with black people with power.

 

[Montrovant]

Because it was a really well made movie with a good story line.

Bullshit. It sucked. But it pandered to a ethnic group that likes to spend money and spent a lot of money seeing it over and over again.

it was a great movie, one of the better superhero movies ever. That you think it sucks is all on you, and not on the movie.

i guess there were too many black people for you in it.,

Wow. YOu made it about race. What a shocker. I am shocked. Shocked.


It sucked. The story was weak as shit. They failed to explain, pretty much everything about Wakanda. They tried to have a fusion of high tech and ancient african culture, which was brave, but they failed, they pandered shamelessly to racist black nationalism, insulting the intelligence of their target audience by doing it badly.

But they made a shit load of money, because they pandered to what their audience wanted to see.


How much money do you think they could have made, if they had did something similar but to a much larger group? Only not without being shit?

Black Panther is the 12th highest grossing movie of all time, so....probably not much more.

REally? You think that if instead of pandering to a small minority, that they had instead pandered to a target audience five times bigger, that they could not have earned even more?

AND, my point was not that they had to choose between them, but that they could do BOTH.


BALANCE.


Not just serve one side of the socio-political divide, but both.


They are leaving BILLIONS on the table. BILLIONS.

Define how a movie might pander to a white audience the way Black Panther pandered to a black audience. As far as I see it, Black Panther pandered by having a black director, black star, and largely black cast. Those things have been true of many, many movies as far as whites are concerned. What, specifically, do you think should or could have been done to pander to the larger audience?

 

[Montrovant]

It is not a lie, this whole thread is proof it is not a lie.

Yes, the way you are using it, is a lie. YOur position is a lie.


Why are you defending the lib assholes that abuse their position to put propaganda into entertainment?

How is it abusing their position?

In fact, wait, just who is it you think is abusing their position, and then how are they doing so? What are the rules of video entertainment you think the abusers must follow?

Any producer, or director, or writer, is hired to produce or direct or write entertainment. To the extent that they choose to NOT do that, and instead produce political propaganda, they are abusing their position, to their selfish partisan ends, instead of making money for the investors.

What is or is not entertainment is subjective. To claim that inserting "political propaganda" is abusing their position is, frankly, ludicrous. There has been political commentary put in film from the very beginning. Authors put it in fiction. Musicians put it in their lyrics. Your argument seems to be that entertainers are only allowed to be creative in ways that you approve of.

If the artistic vision, truly has a political message in it, such as in say... the original Rollerball, with it's anti-corporate message, that in one thing.


BUt if some character just equates watching Fox News with wanting to wage a genocidal war of conquest, for no reason, that is bullshit and someone should have told the writer who wrote it, to save his partisan bile for his personal time. And to be less of an asshole.

Why did George Lucas put Jar-Jar in the prequels? Should he be prosecuted for abuse of power for such horrible writing as those movies contained? We could point out various problems with any movie, I'm sure...what's the point? Why is shit writing so terrible when it involves political statements, but not otherwise?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I am so excited. I was just hired by a big movie exec to act as official editor for the 40 year celebration 2020 re-release of the movie "Airplane"!

Now, it may sould like a daunting task, but it's really much easier than it may seem to bring the movie into alignment with today's standards. All i really have to do is go through the movie, remove all the funny bits and voila'