- Thread starter
- #121
How is it stupid to require all employers to respect employee safety laws?I wouldn't like it, nor would it be fair. But banning it in every bar is just stupid.
Why should some get a pass? is it because bar employees are undeserving of the same protections as all other types of employees?
I've had this discussion with you before, and I recall your previous arguments, which appear to be unchanged. Everything you say revolves around an unshakeable belief that passive smoking is as dangerous or more dangerous than direct smoking. Like most antis, you will not listen to anyone who is not as convinced as you are, and have an alarming tendency to become more hysterical in your condemnation the longer the debate goes on.
You also have a tendency to muddy the waters of the debate....
I am constantly amused by all the loopy logic some smokers will come up with to try and justify imposing their drug on everyone around them. All this nonsense about how cigarette smoke never hurt anyone...
....such as there where you are (deliberately I would say) confusing some peoples' disagreement with the dangers of passive smoking with the dangers of smoking in general.
Or here...
Why should some get a pass? is it because bar employees are undeserving of the same protections as all other types of employees?
...where you ask an absurd question to try and put others on the back foot.
This seems to be your modus operandi. If there is a danger of "the other side's" objections sounding reasonable, try to undermine their position by putting words in their mouths or resorting to other such nonsense.