So as long as there is no Speaker, they can't vote more money for Ukraine. What's wrong with that?

Right, the Swamp already got their fix of money so they are good, for a few months anyway

heroin-addict-injecting-his-dose-picture-id1093202290

McConnell realized that the Republican Congress was incapable of agreeing on anything.
If he wanted anything done, he would have to do it this year
 
It highlights why you don't elect Republicans. They simply don't want to govern...they want anarchy at this point.

It should be fun to see the weekend news shows if this goes on.
Remember when the Democrats in Congress dutifully lined up to vote for Nancy Pelosi like good little boys and girls in exchange for nothing.

Think better!
 
The press is shittin' razorblades but the public knows we are getting a break. ;)
 
Remember when the Democrats in Congress dutifully lined up to vote for Nancy Pelosi like good little boys and girls in exchange for nothing.

Think better!
Exchange for nothing?

Did you miss all the Democratic legislative achievements last year?
 
And they can't run up any more debt on our grandchildren. I say that's a win-win.
That's why they passed the bill with money for Ukraine just a few weeks ago, with bipartisan support.... Because they knew the new Congress might not get the money for Ukraine passed, or in the amounts needed passed.
 
That's why they passed the bill with money for Ukraine just a few weeks ago, with bipartisan support.... Because they knew the new Congress might not get the money for Ukraine passed, or in the amounts needed passed.
Awesome, now we can blow the arms and legs off more people. Let's hear it Dems, three cheers for blowing arms and legs off people...#SARCASM
 

Forum List

Back
Top