Moonglow
Diamond Member
Talking to yourself I see, insanity or just need a good man to talk to?The way I see it there are only 2 reasons you aren't willing to answer what I ask.I didn't deflect anything I answered the question honestly be saying that it's an impossible question to answer, we're talking probabilities not absolute numbers. I even gave an analogy. But again you are deflecting. Why do you think POSSIBLE economic harm warrants a high degree of potential harm to future generations. Harm that ranges from severe storms at the very least, to possible mass extinction at it's highest range?You pussy you defected from my question.
Once again how many of the 97% agree on how much man contributes to global warming?
It's an easy answer...
Is it
5%
20%
50%
85%
What is the number they agree on?
.
Like the hurricanes al promised us after Katrina?
Your ilk wants to bankrupt us from the something we can't control..
You are not using logic we are on this planet for a ride.
-"I'm convinced I'm right so the scientific community can suck it."
To which I would say." Being convinced of something while most evidence suggests you're wrong is faith, and you can't argue with a religious person."
-" I don't care if I'm right, my future is the only one that matters, my children can suck it."
To which I would say. " you are selfish and irresponsible."
If there's a third option I don't know what it would be. So what is it?
Still posting babbling stuf and throwing a temper tantrum?
Again the paris accord does nothing except transfers wealth .
You don't want science.. That's not your goal.
It's a ruse..
.