So it appears the "whistleblower" was not truthful.

[LaDairis]

We have a whole section for retarded conspiracy theories way over there

"conspiracy theories" = telling the truth about Hillary, Israel, Biden, or Algore's Fraud

 

[GreenBean]

Then yesterday, the Intelligence Community’s inspector general, Trump appointee Michael Atkinson, posted a short statement online correcting Davis. Using heavily bureaucratized language and the patient and polite tone city officials use to assure the local gadfly that the water department is not sending alien nodes through his plumbing, the I.G. made a few basic points. First, the rules governing whistle-blowers have not changed. At all.

Second, the I.G. had developed a new form for whistle-blowers to use to file their complaints because the old form may have been confusing. (“[C]ertain language in those forms and, more specifically, the informational materials accompanying the forms, could be read — incorrectly — as suggesting that whistleblowers must possess first-hand information.”) That’s the change Davis seized upon — a clarification of the wording in the submission form, not a change in the requirement.

In a rational world, The Federalist would be publishing mortified corrections and Republicans would be engaged in soul-searching as to how such a simplistic fallacy had gained credence at the highest levels of their party. In a world where the conservative movement had at least some slight attachment to reality, the Federalistas would be quietly slinking away and changing the subject.

But in the actual world, they are continuing to insist they were right all along. The Federalist reporting team has not even developed its own alternative sources. Instead, they are plucking out sentences from the I.G. report that was written to correct their errors and claiming them as vindication.

Trump-Picked Intelligence I.G. Debunks GOP Conspiracy Theory

" heavily bureaucratized language and the patient and polite tone city officials " and Blind Boos - - - your post goes in a full circle and doesn't say a whole helluva lot - try taking off the sunglasses , get the joystick outta your mouth and try that again dumbass

 

[depotoo]

It's my understanding that the evidence does not look like it came from one author,
but, a collage from many.
Would the democrats stoop to that level?

Yes.

 

[rjs330]

Its getting much worse than just the leaker lying.

The CIA's IG along with other inside operatives were the ones who changed the WB rules as Adam Schiff and his merry band were creating the document leaked by the leaker. A rules change requires the White House and the presidents approval under the Whistle blower Act, which did not occur. The change was made by CIA staffers and the IG.

Schiff and the IG colluded to create this false flag in an attempt to damage Trump and set him up for impeachment. This is why the Dems wanted to move very fast to get to impeachment. But Trump releasing the transcripts blew a hole in their ship a mile wide and uncovered the Coup Attempt, again... As the ship sinks the rats are fleeing and giving up their leaders...

People need to go to prison for this..

While I agree with you mostly, I'm not seeing the Dems admitting their ship is sinking and fleeing from it. It seems they are continuing.

 

[JusticeHammer]

It's my understanding that the evidence does not look like it came from one author,
but, a collage from many.
Would the democrats stoop to that level?

Yes.

 

[justoffal]

The Whistleblower's actions before and after filing the "complaint" was coordinated with a change in the complaint form that deliberately muddied the requirements of the Whistleblower to actually have direct knowledge of WTF the complaint is about.

Would any judge accept second hand knowledge from anyone in any legal case? Of course not, this is legal absurdity.

In short, it's the Democrats again playing games with the law to push through their Impeachment dream of Donald Trump.

I'm anxious for the impeachment vote it will put all of the traitors on record and bring out the backstabbing bastards in the Senate also. This is what the Republican party has needed for a long time ...a good cleaning out.

Jo

Can't imagine that the there will be an open actual vote.
They haven't even voted for the formal inquiry yet.
The Grand Illusion.

Like I said in a post a few days ago
They're cowards because to take a formal vote it becomes a matter of public record. What an awesome campaign gimmick for an opposing Republican! Hold up the signature on the campaign trail: "this is the guy who voted to impeach a United States president based on nothing."

I'm telling you it would be a knockout punch in 90% of the swing districts.

Jo

 

[SmokeALib]

A walk down fantasy lane...

No need to post your address on here...

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It's my understanding that the evidence does not look like it came from one author,
but, a collage from many.
Would the democrats stoop to that level?

Everything I've read says the same but not firsthand. Would they stopped that low? Theyll stoop as low as they can if it means getting rid of trump. Evidence be damned.