Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.why three?They need to build a wall between them and us. That will help keep guns and illegals out.
Canada, unlike United State, recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014.
Can somebody post hos many we had during that time?
Is three less than what the US had during that time?
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
LolAccess to guns
If I invented a gun that could take out 1/4th of a football stadium with one pull of the trigger, would you be ok with the masses owning this gun?
Of course you would.
So 16,000 people with one pull of my trigger. You think it would be ok for everyone and anyone to own this gun?
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Lol
If I invented a gun that could take out 1/4th of a football stadium with one pull of the trigger, would you be ok with the masses owning this gun?
Of course you would.
So 16,000 people with one pull of my trigger. You think it would be ok for everyone and anyone to own this gun?
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
You have a right to bare arms. The constitution says nothing about AR's.
What do you mean you don't have a right to those things? I thought in America we are free. If we are, then you do have a right to a knife or hammer or lawn mower. This argument is stupid. Accidents happen.
What you should not be free to do is possess a wmd.
Use the Google... lolLolIf I invented a gun that could take out 1/4th of a football stadium with one pull of the trigger, would you be ok with the masses owning this gun?
Of course you would.
So 16,000 people with one pull of my trigger. You think it would be ok for everyone and anyone to own this gun?
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
Use the Google... lolLol
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
And you can own a gun. Just not an assault rifle. No place for them in our society.
Use the Google... lolLol
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
And you can own a gun. Just not an assault rifle. No place for them in our society.
Lol
If I invented a gun that could take out 1/4th of a football stadium with one pull of the trigger, would you be ok with the masses owning this gun?
Of course you would.
So 16,000 people with one pull of my trigger. You think it would be ok for everyone and anyone to own this gun?
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
You have a right to bare arms. The constitution says nothing about AR's.
What do you mean you don't have a right to those things? I thought in America we are free. If we are, then you do have a right to a knife or hammer or lawn mower. This argument is stupid. Accidents happen.
What you should not be free to do is possess a wmd.
Use the Google... lolSays the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
And you can own a gun. Just not an assault rifle. No place for them in our society.
AR-15s are not assault rifles...to begin with......and you were told you are an idiot in the Supreme Court ruling in Heller.... and the followup in Friedman v Highland Park as well as Caetano v Masschusetts.....not to forget Miller as well....you moron.
Use the Google... lol
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
And you can own a gun. Just not an assault rifle. No place for them in our society.
AR-15s are not assault rifles...to begin with......and you were told you are an idiot in the Supreme Court ruling in Heller.... and the followup in Friedman v Highland Park as well as Caetano v Masschusetts.....not to forget Miller as well....you moron.
SPLITTING HAIRS OVER WHETHER THEY ARE TECHNICALLY ASSAULT RIFLES IS PICKING UP THE PEANUTS WHILE BEING TRAMPLED BY THE ELEPHANTS.
LolIf I invented a gun that could take out 1/4th of a football stadium with one pull of the trigger, would you be ok with the masses owning this gun?
Of course you would.
So 16,000 people with one pull of my trigger. You think it would be ok for everyone and anyone to own this gun?
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
You have a right to bare arms. The constitution says nothing about AR's.
What do you mean you don't have a right to those things? I thought in America we are free. If we are, then you do have a right to a knife or hammer or lawn mower. This argument is stupid. Accidents happen.
What you should not be free to do is possess a wmd.
Here.....this shows you are an idiot.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.
We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.
Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.
Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid.
Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.
Lol
Firearms have nothing to do with violent behavior, because they do not change the person or control the person.
It all comes back to the individual, Blaming an inanimate object Is childish at Best
Says the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
You have a right to bare arms. The constitution says nothing about AR's.
What do you mean you don't have a right to those things? I thought in America we are free. If we are, then you do have a right to a knife or hammer or lawn mower. This argument is stupid. Accidents happen.
What you should not be free to do is possess a wmd.
Here.....this shows you are an idiot.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
Some have made the argument, bordering on the frivolous, that only those arms in existence in the 18th century are protected by the Second Amendment.
We do not interpret constitutional rights that way. Just as the First Amendment protects modern forms of communications, e.g., Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union, 521 U. S. 844, 849 (1997), and the Fourth Amendment applies to modern forms of search, e.g., Kyllo v. United States, 533 U. S. 27, 35–36 (2001), the Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existence at the time of the founding.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf
That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense.
Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629. And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625.
The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.
Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid.
Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.
IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER WHAT YOU CALL THEM, IT MATTERS THAT AR15'S ARE THE WEAPON OF CHOICE FOR MASS KILLERS, AND THE GUN IS DESIGNED TO INFLICT MAXIMUM DEATH AND DAMAGE TO VICTIMS.
if that's what you got from that, you're a fking kook.Use the Google... lol
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
Guns are supposed to defend people, not the other way around. The NRA used to be about gun safety and training. Now it's a lobby for gun manufacturers.
Out of the millions of AR's sold to the American public, it doesn't matter what percentage of them are used in mass murders, it's that all of the mass shooters are using this particular weapon to increase their body counts. One is too many.
35,000 gun deaths every single year. What's the point of spending all of that money on a weapon if you don't get to use it? 1000 children every single year. No other first world nation faces this level of carnage.
I know a guy that owns over 100 cars, he drives only two or three. I used to own millions on baseball cards. They are called collections, people have them because they bring them joy. The largest collection of guns is over 66,000 and is in the Los Angeles area, they are used as props for movies, you know the movies that don't promote violence of any kind. A selection of their guns are in an NRA museum.
Are you advocating for movie violence censorship?
how many were there the previous 14 years? do you even know? Maybe there were two and you increased by one. funny how logic never sticks to a leftist.so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.why three?They need to build a wall between them and us. That will help keep guns and illegals out.
Canada, unlike United State, recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014.
Can somebody post hos many we had during that time?
Is three less than what the US had during that time?
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
it looks mean. they can't stand the look. isn't that fking hilarious?Use the Google... lolSays the purported gun dealer.
The AR15 the Ohio shooter was carrying, killed or injured nearly 30 people in 30 seconds before the police shot him in a hail of bullets. This rifle is sold with advertising it's ability to take out multiple targets quickly with maximum internal damage. This is the preferred weapon of mass shooters everywhere. A gun with no reasonable value except to raise the body count.
Other countries have a tradition of hunting too. Canada also has a tradition of retail hunting and fishing. Rich people flying in to hunt tropies, although many of the trophy species are now facing extinction, like Grizzlies, and polar bears. Restrictions on gun ownership and people killing weapons and handguns have done NOTHING to curb legitmate hunters or the industries built around them in other countries.
My husband's family owns a huge hunting camp near Huntsville, which they bought more than 50 years ago, which sleeps 60. There's a big shindig there at the end of every deer season. One of my brothers went deer hunting for two weeks every year, throughout his adult life. I've enjoyed moose and deer, killed by family members. One of my Toronto neighbours went duck hunting every fall. The Lake Erie community where I now live is on the duck migration route, and hunters are currently spiffing up their blinds.
If gun ownership made people safer, then the USA wouldn't be the most dangerous country in the first world. It would be the safest.
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
And you can own a gun. Just not an assault rifle. No place for them in our society.
AR-15s are not assault rifles...to begin with......and you were told you are an idiot in the Supreme Court ruling in Heller.... and the followup in Friedman v Highland Park as well as Caetano v Masschusetts.....not to forget Miller as well....you moron.
so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.why three?They need to build a wall between them and us. That will help keep guns and illegals out.
Canada, unlike United State, recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014.
Can somebody post hos many we had during that time?
Is three less than what the US had during that time?
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
or he can tell us how many mass shootings the previous 14 years and make him look like a fking idiot he is.so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.why three?Canada, unlike United State, recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014.
Can somebody post hos many we had during that time?
Is three less than what the US had during that time?
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
There's always plan B, you move to Canada.
so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.why three?Canada, unlike United State, recorded only three mass shootings between 2000 and 2014.
Can somebody post hos many we had during that time?
Is three less than what the US had during that time?
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
There's always plan B, you move to Canada.
so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
There's always plan B, you move to Canada.
Why do you call that a plan?
Are you really just pining for some good olde fascist authoritarian rule here in a Merica which takes away the vote.
why don't you tell us how many mass shootings the previous 14 years of your sample?so, not clear your point. so you brag about gun laws that actually don't work, you just proved it, you said three of them. if there is one it's too many, the fact three is a wave of a hand tells me who you really are.
If gun laws in Canada controlled rampage shootings to just three in 14 years, I say write them into law here. Shows they're effective.
There's always plan B, you move to Canada.
Why do you call that a plan?
Are you really just pining for some good olde fascist authoritarian rule here in a Merica which takes away the vote.
Use the Google... lol
ARs and the like are least of this country’s worry’s, Cars, alcohol, lawn mowers, bath tubs, hammers, knives, etc. All have higher body counts then people using ARs.
None of which are an right like firearm ownership is.
It’s American thing you obviously don’t understand... lol
Post the source of this so-called data.
Out of the millions of ARs owned legally by Americans what is percentage of them are used in Violent crime?
Basically a percentage off of an percentage at best... Cars for instance kill far more people. And vehicle ownership is not even an right, it a privilege. Firearm ownership is an absolute right less someone fucks it up for themselves.
Like I said political correctness makes people fucking retarded.
Guns are supposed to defend people, not the other way around. The NRA used to be about gun safety and training. Now it's a lobby for gun manufacturers.
Out of the millions of AR's sold to the American public, it doesn't matter what percentage of them are used in mass murders, it's that all of the mass shooters are using this particular weapon to increase their body counts. One is too many.
35,000 gun deaths every single year. What's the point of spending all of that money on a weapon if you don't get to use it? 1000 children every single year. No other first world nation faces this level of carnage.
I know a guy that owns over 100 cars, he drives only two or three. I used to own millions on baseball cards. They are called collections, people have them because they bring them joy. The largest collection of guns is over 66,000 and is in the Los Angeles area, they are used as props for movies, you know the movies that don't promote violence of any kind. A selection of their guns are in an NRA museum.
Are you advocating for movie violence censorship?
