justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 24,618
- 16,681
- Thread starter
- #21
So many conservative cultists screaming out their political nonsense on the topic. The normal people just look at the science, and don't bring politics into it. To such sane people, it's not a matter of wishing humans were causing global warming, any more than it's a matter of wishing humans caused gravity. The observed data shows greenhouse gases holding in more heat. Therefore, global warming.
Remember, global warming denial isn't the cult. Global warming denial is one of the many crazy beliefs that the right wing extremist fringe cult members are required to proclaim loudly. If they don't, they'll be ostracized by their fellow cultists. To such right-wing herd beasts, banishment from the herd would be like a death sentence, so they'll say anything to stay in the good graces of the cult, no matter how crazy it sounds.
Wow another high priest of " Holier than thouness" speaks forth! It's amazing how duplicitous one can be while at the same time believing that they are Just " 100 percent " correct with absolutely no curiosity at all about the opposing point of view. A view which is summarily dismissed as somehow... " less intelligent " not because science proves anything at all but because it is exactly what the top post claims it isn't ....POLITICAL. Peer reviewed Peer pressure has become the norm in Greenscam. People who have doubts are immediately attacked by the Consensus hounds who produce all manner of junk science proclamations in pursuit of total acquiescence. It is the glorious return of Lysenkoism to the once honestly scientific community that is now mandated to come up with results that fit the narrative. The mice that don't make it through the maze are tossed into the trash bin in favor of the few that get coaxed to the cheese.
" The Observed Data " shows many things including a recent halt to the once ballyhooed ski jump into oblivion. We have passed the 400 ppm mark that was once seen by the so called " Consensus " as the point of no return. Now, instead of sticking by their original assumptions like " By 2012 the Arctic ice cap will be gone " , " The Alps will melt off ", " catastrophic droughts " and undersea coastlines....we have to reset the narrative because it won't make any money if people believe the original story that we can no longer save ourselves.
Good Graces? ..... No one is less tolerant of dissent than the " Greenscam consensus hounds "... the many scientists who have questioned their information have suffered a storm of ostracism from that community up to and including job loss, slander, libel and threats.
What a joke.
JO
Last edited: