Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahem:There it is, you got it.It does? Perhaps you can point out the specific text that grants the federal government that power.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
Ahem:There it is, you got it.
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
"Justice Clark noted that under the Interstate Commerce Act, the power of Congress to promote interstate commerce also includes the power to regulate the local incidents thereof, including local activities in both the States of origin and destination, which might have a substantial and harmful effect upon that commerce. One need only examine the evidence which we have discussed above to see that Congress mayas it hasprohibit racial discrimination by motels serving travelers, however 'local' their operations may appear.
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (1964)
There it is, you got it.It does? Perhaps you can point out the specific text that grants the federal government that power.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
There it is, you got it.It does? Perhaps you can point out the specific text that grants the federal government that power.
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
There it is, you got it.
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
Sure, except the federal judiciary on my side. You don't like it, sue.
There it is, you got it.
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
Pollution is a national security issue. The federal government has the mandate to protect the American people from all enemies, foreign and domestic. The military of the United States is derived from the People, so in the interests of national defense, which is an explicit federal responsibility, the protection of the health and safety of the People is a national security interest.
That's what I read.
Looks like he's trying to straddle a prickly fence and not doing a very good job of it.
And neither one of you read the first post.
You simply pick and choose what you want out of context and then start maligning people. Just as you did in the OP.
Immie
Your statement I put in blue cannot be fixed with context, unless of the context is to add,
hey, I didn't mean what I said.
Why don't you just confirm or deny what said, in the blue quote, and be done with it.
That's what I thought.
You got nothing!
Sure, except the federal judiciary on my side. You don't like it, sue.
You haven't shown anything that supported your claim. so yea , you got nothing.
Sure, except the federal judiciary on my side. You don't like it, sue.
You haven't shown anything that supported your claim. so yea , you got nothing.
If the courts had ruled the EPA unconstitutional it wouldn't be there.
The constitution doesn't protect the rights of the free market.To not eat there, and then to give my business to a restaurant that doesn't have a bigoted POV (and probably has better quality food).Why not? The country was founded on the principal of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness...the federal documents (the constitution) includes the bill of rights. If someone wants to be an American and/or operate in America they cannot act in an un-American manner.And that makes him wrong how?
His issue is that federal government shouldn't be involved in certain matters.
What liberty do you really have if someone can refuse to serve you a meal simply because of your skin color?
Free Market at work there.
You haven't shown anything that supported your claim. so yea , you got nothing.
If the courts had ruled the EPA unconstitutional it wouldn't be there.
Was it ever challenged?
It doesn't give you rights, either, though.The constitution doesn't protect the rights of the free market.To not eat there, and then to give my business to a restaurant that doesn't have a bigoted POV (and probably has better quality food).Why not? The country was founded on the principal of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness...the federal documents (the constitution) includes the bill of rights. If someone wants to be an American and/or operate in America they cannot act in an un-American manner.
What liberty do you really have if someone can refuse to serve you a meal simply because of your skin color?
Free Market at work there.
I'll look it up to see if it has been, anyway. Just to satisfy curiosity.If the courts had ruled the EPA unconstitutional it wouldn't be there.
Was it ever challenged?
Its been around since Nixon. If it hasn't been challenged yet maybe you should. Until then its the law.
It doesn't give you rights, either, though.The constitution doesn't protect the rights of the free market.To not eat there, and then to give my business to a restaurant that doesn't have a bigoted POV (and probably has better quality food).
Free Market at work there.
Democrats: making stupidity into an artform.
I know. What does that have to do with my question?It doesn't give you rights, either, though.The constitution doesn't protect the rights of the free market.To not eat there, and then to give my business to a restaurant that doesn't have a bigoted POV (and probably has better quality food).
Free Market at work there.
