So Who's Really Being Intolerant ?

[jknowgood]

"So Who's Really Being Intolerant ?"

Conservatives, who seek to discriminate against gay patrons for no other reason than who those patrons are, in violation of just, proper, and Constitutional public accommodations laws that in no way 'violate' religious liberty.

All the bakers and florist that I heard about was happy to do business with them. They just didn't want to host their wedding. So the queers are intolerant.

 

[WinterBorn]

"Contrary to nature."

Anything exhibited by nature or non-human animals is "natural" yes? So what about the several hundred species of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviours and preferences? Sounds pretty "natural" to me.

Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality Yale Scientific Magazine

My dog also licks his ass, do you lick your ass?

Absolutely not relevant. The comment was made that homosexuality was "unnatural". It was then shown to be natural. No one claimed that we should do everything that every animal does.

 

[candycorn]

"So Who's Really Being Intolerant ?"

Conservatives, who seek to discriminate against gay patrons for no other reason than who those patrons are, in violation of just, proper, and Constitutional public accommodations laws that in no way 'violate' religious liberty.

Liar.

It has to do with one thing, providing a product that conflicts with one's religious principles.

Why does a homosexual's desire to purchase a product outweigh a person's right to religious freedom?

Answer: it doesn't.

Go find one of 99 bakers who will provide the product you seek and leave the 1 who cannot, be. They will either flourish or wither and die but will do so while still enjoying their religious freedom.

This whole thing is nothing but homosexuals screaming 'you must see me, hear me, approve of me or you are a hater.'

Diversity of thought? Yeah, right.

What if you chose not to rent an apartment to a gay couple?

FIrst...how do you know they are gay if they do not tell you. Lots of same sex people live together when they are young to share expenses. Lots of same sex people live together when they are old to share expenses.

Can you justify denying them of shelter based on what you "think" they are doing at night?

 

[AmericanFirst]

"Contrary to nature."

Anything exhibited by nature or non-human animals is "natural" yes? So what about the several hundred species of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviours and preferences? Sounds pretty "natural" to me.

Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality Yale Scientific Magazine

Some animals also eat their young. Animals do all kinds of weird stuff. Doesn't mean we should do it.

Exactly.

 

[WinterBorn]

"So Who's Really Being Intolerant ?"

Conservatives, who seek to discriminate against gay patrons for no other reason than who those patrons are, in violation of just, proper, and Constitutional public accommodations laws that in no way 'violate' religious liberty.

Liar.

It has to do with one thing, providing a product that conflicts with one's religious principles.

Why does a homosexual's desire to purchase a product outweigh a person's right to religious freedom?

Answer: it doesn't.

Go find one of 99 bakers who will provide the product you seek and leave the 1 who cannot, be. They will either flourish or wither and die but will do so while still enjoying their religious freedom.

This whole thing is nothing but homosexuals screaming 'you must see me, hear me, approve of me or you are a hater.'

Diversity of thought? Yeah, right.

What if you chose not to rent an apartment to a gay couple?

FIrst...how do you know they are gay if they do not tell you. Lots of same sex people live together when they are young to share expenses. Lots of same sex people live together when they are old to share expenses.

Can you justify denying them of shelter based on what you "think" they are doing at night?

This simply shows what the "christians" really want. They are not concerned about homosexuality. They are concerned about seeing homosexuality. In other words, if those damned queers would just go back in the closet everything would be ok.

 

[protectionist]

You seem to have no problem with not loving ....your fellow man and woman.....

You seem to have a problem with understanding what someone is saying.

Loving is one thing. Recognizing pathology is another.

 

[Moonglow]

You seem to have no problem with not loving ....your fellow man and woman.....

You seem to have a problem with understanding what someone is saying.

Loving is one thing. Recognizing pathology is another.

Christianity is about forgiveness not persecution...

 

[protectionist]

Actually, they are both being intolerant, Perhaps what it really comes down to is who is right to be intolerant to the other, and for whom is it wrong. The gays are demanding that society recognize them as normal, when they are abnormal, sicko, degenerate perverts, who engage in pure looneybird behavior, that's contrary to nature.

Nature is hertosexual?? You better rethink that..

Yes. Nature IS heterosexual. If you don't think so, than YOU need to do the rethinking.

 

[protectionist]

Are the Christians being intolerant of the gays, or are the gays being intolerant of the Christians ? To hear the gays, and their supporters tell it, only the Christians are being intolerant to them. As the Christians say, they aren't being tolerant or intolerant - they are just following their religious rules.

Actually, they are both being intolerant, Perhaps what it really comes down to is who is right to be intolerant to the other, and for whom is it wrong. The gays are demanding that society recognize them as normal, when they are abnormal, sicko, degenerate perverts, who engage in pure looneybird behavior, that's contrary to nature.

The Christians demand that they have the right to choose what to deal with and not deal with, as set up by the religious freedom laws. Looks like an easy choice. The Christians should not only be able to conduct their business their way, without having to participate in crazy homosexual activiites, but those activities themselves ought to be banned, for the betterment of society and to protect children from this lunacy.

We're not proposing discriminatory laws. That's ya'll.

FALSE! Pence and Hutchinson were pressured by the gay lobby to enact laws amending the RFRA laws.

 

[Moonglow]

Actually, they are both being intolerant, Perhaps what it really comes down to is who is right to be intolerant to the other, and for whom is it wrong. The gays are demanding that society recognize them as normal, when they are abnormal, sicko, degenerate perverts, who engage in pure looneybird behavior, that's contrary to nature.

Nature is hertosexual?? You better rethink that..

Yes. Nature IS heterosexual. If you don't think so, than YOU need to do the rethinking.

I'll tell that to the next amoeba I talk to...

 

[protectionist]

"Contrary to nature."

Anything exhibited by nature or non-human animals is "natural" yes? So what about the several hundred species of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviours and preferences? Sounds pretty "natural" to me.

Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality Yale Scientific Magazine

NO. "Anything" exhibited by animals is NOT natural. Homosexuality is exhibited by various species of animals, and being contrary to nature (design of body parts and functions) is thereby not natural.

Homosexuality sounds natural to you, because you don't have a correct definition of "natural".

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Tolerance and endorsement are not the same. Homofascists need to learn this.

 

[WinterBorn]

You seem to have no problem with not loving ....your fellow man and woman.....

You seem to have a problem with understanding what someone is saying.

Loving is one thing. Recognizing pathology is another.

And two people loving each other is not dependent on either mismatched genitalia or your approval.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

"Contrary to nature."

Anything exhibited by nature or non-human animals is "natural" yes? So what about the several hundred species of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviours and preferences? Sounds pretty "natural" to me.

Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality Yale Scientific Magazine

Only an idiot would compare irrational animal behavior to rational humans.

Parental killing of offspring, intra-species devouring are also in according with animal nature. Are you saying that filicide and cannibalism are therefore in accordance with human nature?

 

[protectionist]

The ones calling for violence against the shop are intolerant.

The shop owners are intolerant.

The peaceful protesters are not.

Of course the peaceful protestors are intolerant. They refuse to tolerate the religious limitations of the Christians.

 

[WinterBorn]

"Contrary to nature."

Anything exhibited by nature or non-human animals is "natural" yes? So what about the several hundred species of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviours and preferences? Sounds pretty "natural" to me.

Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality Yale Scientific Magazine

NO. "Anything" exhibited by animals is NOT natural. Homosexuality is exhibited by various species of animals, and being contrary to nature (design of body parts and functions) is thereby not natural.

Homosexuality sounds natural to you, because you don't have a correct definition of "natural".

Any behavior exhibited by numerous species and in unconnected contexts is, in fact, natural.

That is not part of the reproductive cycle does not necessarily mean it is unnatural.

 

[WinterBorn]

The ones calling for violence against the shop are intolerant.

The shop owners are intolerant.

The peaceful protesters are not.

Of course the peaceful protestors are intolerant. They refuse to tolerate the religious limitations of the Christians.

I have no problem with someone who actually wants to conform to their religion. But when these assholes have no problem working on the Sabbath, cheating people, lying, and committing adultery, but want to be able to discriminate against someone who does not share their religious beliefs, they are not exercising their religious freedoms. They are hiding their bigotry and hate-mongering behind their beliefs.

 

[Moonglow]

"Contrary to nature."

Anything exhibited by nature or non-human animals is "natural" yes? So what about the several hundred species of animals exhibiting homosexual behaviours and preferences? Sounds pretty "natural" to me.

Do Animals Exhibit Homosexuality Yale Scientific Magazine

NO. "Anything" exhibited by animals is NOT natural. Homosexuality is exhibited by various species of animals, and being contrary to nature (design of body parts and functions) is thereby not natural.

Homosexuality sounds natural to you, because you don't have a correct definition of "natural".

Natural usage would indicate a perspective relative to pro creation..Yet humans are capable of controlling reproduction unlike animals...Elderly couples get married because of love, not for reproduction...If two humans of the same sex want to live that whey I have no problem with it, because of the hope involved with love between humans...
The toxic shame that religious people addicted to religion spread is not helping the cause of what was Jesus' words when he spoke of loving each other, and that was to treat others, as you would want to be treated....if you love the sinner but hate the sin, how can you show them the light and be a positive force, feeding the soul the bread of God? If you are mean and turn them away?

 

[protectionist]

Are the Christians being intolerant of the gays, or are the gays being intolerant of the Christians ? To hear the gays, and their supporters tell it, only the Christians are being intolerant to them. As the Christians say, they aren't being tolerant or intolerant - they are just following their religious rules.

Actually, they are both being intolerant, Perhaps what it really comes down to is who is right to be intolerant to the other, and for whom is it wrong. The gays are demanding that society recognize them as normal, when they are abnormal, sicko, degenerate perverts, who engage in pure looneybird behavior, that's contrary to nature.

The Christians demand that they have the right to choose what to deal with and not deal with, as set up by the religious freedom laws. Looks like an easy choice. The Christians should not only be able to conduct their business their way, without having to participate in crazy homosexual activiites, but those activities themselves ought to be banned, for the betterment of society and to protect children from this lunacy.

I find it amusing that someone has a business that is open on the Sabbath, but they claim it is against their religion to serve gays. lmao It seems to me like they are in desperate need of an education on what their religion actually says.

Now, the threats of violence on either side are wrong. But when you start out passing laws designed to further discrimination, you don't get to complain when people get pissed off at you.

In the case of Christians and gays, it is impossible for someone to not be discriminated against. Discrimination is not necessarily a bad thing. It is done all the time by all of us. What matters is how it is done, and for what reason.

In the case of Indiana and Arkansas, the governors chose to discriminate against the Christians, while letting the gays have their way. Should have been the reverse.

 

[protectionist]

Actually, they are both being intolerant, Perhaps what it really comes down to is who is right to be intolerant to the other, and for whom is it wrong. The gays are demanding that society recognize them as normal, when they are abnormal, sicko, degenerate perverts, who engage in pure looneybird behavior, that's contrary to nature.

Nature is hertosexual?? You better rethink that..

Yes. Nature IS heterosexual. If you don't think so, than YOU need to do the rethinking.

I'll tell that to the next amoeba I talk to...

DODGE!