So you love socialism ?????

[Dovahkiin]

Comparing venezuela to america and Bernie's policies that are hardly anything "socialist" is childish.

 

[Contumacious]

EXCUSE ME FUCKTARD

THE REASON THAT SOMALIA IS WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT IS BECAUSE SOCIALISM DESTROYED THAT COUNTRY. IT IS NOT BECAUSE ITS CITIZENS CONCLUDED THAT ANARCHY WAS BEST.

Keep digging that hole your stupidity has dug.....

So, Somalia is screwed up because of socialism? Did Glenn Beck tell you that?

They're NOT screwed up because of tribal differences...They're NOT screwed up because of religious factions....They're NOT screwed up because of thugs with guns..............Your moronic "conclusion" is socialism????

What the hell is the matter with you nut cases? Don't breed and don't vote...Stay home and play with your guns and bibles.

AND THE FACTS CITED THEREIN ARE WRONG BECAUSE..............................................................?.


.

 

[Contumacious]

Comparing venezuela to america and Bernie's policies that are hardly anything "socialist" is childish.

WUT?

 

[nat4900]

AND THE FACTS CITED THEREIN ARE WRONG BECAUSE..............................................................?.

There are NO facts in that article....Just libertarian biases and opinions to con uneducated morons.....like you.

 

[Dovahkiin]

Comparing venezuela to america and Bernie's policies that are hardly anything "socialist" is childish.

WUT?

Please use a normal font.

 

[Contumacious]

Comparing venezuela to america and Bernie's policies that are hardly anything "socialist" is childish.

WUT?

Please use a normal font.

FUCK YOU, THEN.

 

[Rustic]

Unregulated capitolism will destroy itself . We've seen this in our own country .

You need to have that good balance where u don't want to stifle economic growth, but u also don't want it to cause more harm than good .

Socialism has been destroying this country for decades, socialism is all about control and irresponsibility...
Dumbass

 

[Contumacious]

AND THE FACTS CITED THEREIN ARE WRONG BECAUSE..............................................................?.

There are NO facts in that article....Just libertarian biases and opinions to con uneducated morons.....like you.

OK, STAY IGNORANT , AND VOTE FOR COMRADE SANDERS

 

[nat4900]

EXCUSE ME FUCKTARD

THE REASON THAT SOMALIA IS WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT IS BECAUSE SOCIALISM DESTROYED THAT COUNTRY. IT IS NOT BECAUSE ITS CITIZENS CONCLUDED THAT ANARCHY WAS BEST.

Keep digging that hole your stupidity has dug.....

So, Somalia is screwed up because of socialism? Did Glenn Beck tell you that?

They're NOT screwed up because of tribal differences...They're NOT screwed up because of religious factions....They're NOT screwed up because of thugs with guns..............Your moronic "conclusion" is socialism????

What the hell is the matter with you nut cases? Don't breed and don't vote...Stay home and play with your guns and bibles.

Mohamed Siad Barre seized power in 1969 and established the Somali Democratic Republic. In 1991, Barre's government collapsed as the Somali Civil War broke out.

Hey, moron...because Somalia had a civil war you "conclude" that they're now a bunch of socialists????

( how do these idiots even manage to turn their computers on without directions?)

 

[nat4900]

EXCUSE ME FUCKTARD

THE REASON THAT SOMALIA IS WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT IS BECAUSE SOCIALISM DESTROYED THAT COUNTRY. IT IS NOT BECAUSE ITS CITIZENS CONCLUDED THAT ANARCHY WAS BEST.

Keep digging that hole your stupidity has dug.....

So, Somalia is screwed up because of socialism? Did Glenn Beck tell you that?

They're NOT screwed up because of tribal differences...They're NOT screwed up because of religious factions....They're NOT screwed up because of thugs with guns..............Your moronic "conclusion" is socialism????

What the hell is the matter with you nut cases? Don't breed and don't vote...Stay home and play with your guns and bibles.

Mohamed Siad Barre seized power in 1969 and established the Somali Democratic Republic. In 1991, Barre's government collapsed as the Somali Civil War broke out.

Hey, moron...because Somalia had a civil war you "conclude" that they're now a bunch of socialists????

( how do these idiots even manage to turn their computers on without directions?)

 

[Dovahkiin]

Comparing venezuela to america and Bernie's policies that are hardly anything "socialist" is childish.

WUT?

Please use a normal font.

FUCK YOU, THEN.

...?

 

[Rustic]

The federal government should not be involved in personal life decisions whatsoever...

When personal life decisions have effects and interference with others, a referee and moderators are needed to rectify the disagreements and disturbances. That is a government's role. You can argue that seat belts should be a personal life decision and not the concern of government, but by not wearing a seatbelt, we know beyond any doubt that others will be paying for the cost of you not wearing that belt if you are injured to a certain extent in an accident. Your personal life decision will cost others and that makes it the government's decision.

the only reason others are paying the cost is the fact that government forces them to. Ino ther words, you used government intervention in the market place as a justification for more government intervention.

How typically liberal

Laws are passed, adjusted or repealed by elected officials who are selectively chosen by citizens. People aren't forced into anything. If a person, as in the seatbelt example, do not want to wear a seatbelt, they don't have to. They can live lives of not riding in cars and using public transportation instead, or they can risk having to pay fines for refusing to wear a seatbelt. They have options, hence, the wearing of the seatbelt is not something being forced upon them.

All laws are enforced with guns. To claim people aren't forced into anything by a law is the height of idiocy. The claim that it isn't force if you have options is even more idiotic. A mugger gives you the choice of handing over your wallet or taking a bullet in the belly. According to you that isn't force because you sill have "options."

I think you just proved that to be a liberal you have to be a complete moron.

You are mixing the option of being killed or shot with the option of being robbed. You are distorting to make try and make your point. Plus, you are not using the example that was given, instead, you have created a new one, hence, you have failed to dispute the original argument about the seatbelt example.

No one should be forced to wear a seatbelt, only a control freak would want such a thing. Dumbass

 

[Contumacious]

EXCUSE ME FUCKTARD

THE REASON THAT SOMALIA IS WITHOUT A GOVERNMENT IS BECAUSE SOCIALISM DESTROYED THAT COUNTRY. IT IS NOT BECAUSE ITS CITIZENS CONCLUDED THAT ANARCHY WAS BEST.

Keep digging that hole your stupidity has dug.....

So, Somalia is screwed up because of socialism? Did Glenn Beck tell you that?

They're NOT screwed up because of tribal differences...They're NOT screwed up because of religious factions....They're NOT screwed up because of thugs with guns..............Your moronic "conclusion" is socialism????

What the hell is the matter with you nut cases? Don't breed and don't vote...Stay home and play with your guns and bibles.

Mohamed Siad Barre seized power in 1969 and established the Somali Democratic Republic. In 1991, Barre's government collapsed as the Somali Civil War broke out.

Hey, moron...because Somalia had a civil war you "conclude" that they're now a bunch of socialists????

( how do these idiots even manage to turn their computers on without directions?)

MOTHERFUCK , THESE STUPID MOTHERFUCKERS MUST BE SPOONFED


The Somali Democratic Republic (Somali: Jamhuuriyadda Dimuqraadiya Soomaaliya, Arabic: الجمهورية الديمقراطية الصومالية‎ al-Jumhūrīyah ad-Dīmuqrāṭīyah aṣ-Ṣūmālīyah, Italian: Repubblica Democratica Somala) was the name that the Marxist–Leninist regime of former President of Somalia Major General Mohamed Siad Barre gave to Somalia during its reign, after having seized power in a bloodless 1969 coup d'état.[4][5][6] The putsch came a few days after the assassination of Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke, the nation's second President, by one of his own bodyguards.[6] Barre's administration would rule Somalia for the following 21 years, until the outbreak of the civil war in 1991"

 

[Rustic]

Socialism worked fine in previously homogenous countries like Sweden and Denmark.

Multiculturalism and multiracialism destroys the opportunity for socialism to work.

It doesn't work even then. It reduces their standard of living.

You can argue that, but capitalism is the reason why their standard of living went even lower still.

Capitalism is the reason why mass immigration exists, socialism is just an economic platform.

Utter horseshit. Capitalism is responsible for all the wealth in the world, and I mean all of it. Socialism, at best, is a parasite that sucks off capitalism. It produces nothing.

Socialism produces plenty. Socialism built Germany up from a shit stain that was practically a 3rd world country in the middle of a recession to the current leader of the EU.

Off other people's money shit for brains, the euro zone is as good as dead.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

[

No one should be forced to wear a seatbelt, only a control freak would want such a thing. Dumbass

Or, someone who supports public health and doesn't like paying the bills, including the higher insurance premiums, for people hurt even more in an accident because they refused to use common sense...

 

[Rustic]

One more time:

Capitalism Requires Government
Print this Article Tell a Friend Share on Facebook Tweet this
"Americans need to realize that our economy has thrived not in spite of government, but in many ways because of government."

Without a whole host of government rules, capitalism could not exist. Even regulations and social programs help sustain a market economy by fixing many of its serious social and economic problems.

One of the most common and misleading economic myths in the United States is the idea that the free market is “natural” – that it exists in some natural world, separate from government. In this view, government rules and regulations only “interfere” with the natural beneficial workings of the market. Even the term “free market” implies that it can exist free from government and that it prospers best when government leaves it alone. Nothing could be further from the truth. In reality, a market economy does not exist separate from government – it is very much a product of government rules and regulations. The dirty little secret of our “free” market system is that it would simply not exist as we know it without the presence of an active government that creates and maintains the rules and conditions that allow it to operate efficiently."
Government is Good - Capitalism Requires Government

Socialism and capitalism - oil and water

 

[Arizona Willie]

Bbbut Socialism works!!!!!!! Ask any left loon on this forum. LMAO

=======
I'm sure this will come as a shock to you --- but there are many differences between Democratic Socialism and a dictatorship which is what Venezuela actually is.

The name they call it is irrelevant.

Most of the other Industrialzied Nations practice some form of Socialism and ... and ... and ...

THE UNITED STATES DOES TOO.

don't like it? Move to Somalia --- you'd love it there.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It enhances capitalism . Having a patent /copywrite laws is socialist . But it helps capitolism by protecting intellectual property .

No it doesn't enhance capitalism. It loots the wealth of the country for the sake of parasitic government constituencies.

So once a movie is released it should be freely accessible to anyone with the means to copy it?

You're getting into an obscure area that even libertarians argue about.

You're the one who said copyrighting is parasitic looting.

I just haven't seen a way to accomplish the same result without government getting involved. Some libertarians say there should be no copyright laws. I believe in private law.

Private law, AKA, anarchy...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Put down that bottle, bripat.......Your stupidity is getting worse.

You have been singularly unable to prove it.

Well, I don't have to prove you're an idiot.....Its fairly obvious to anyone (except a few of your fellow imbeciles)

It's "obvious" only to proven idiots like you.

Are you claiming using force against innocent people is good?

Democratic socialism is using the will of the People. Once you've abandoned the will of the People as a means of government,

what's left?

By "will of the people" you really mean "they tyranny of the majority." I would abandon all government because it all sucks.

And in what nation will you live, that has no government?

 

[Rustic]

No it doesn't enhance capitalism. It loots the wealth of the country for the sake of parasitic government constituencies.

So once a movie is released it should be freely accessible to anyone with the means to copy it?

You're getting into an obscure area that even libertarians argue about.

You're the one who said copyrighting is parasitic looting.

I just haven't seen a way to accomplish the same result without government getting involved. Some libertarians say there should be no copyright laws. I believe in private law.

How about anti trust laws? Without them you'll end up with monopolies which destroy the base of capitalism......competition !

The federal government is the largest monopoly the planet has ever seen, definitely the most corrupt...
Shithead