Chillicothe
Platinum Member
- Feb 14, 2021
- 10,474
- 6,717
--------------------------------------------------------------
No one has proven otherwise?
I demur.
My voting precinct did.
They counted, checked, checked, and then sent their count to the county....which tabulated all precincts, checked, and re-checked.......and sent their numbers to the State. And the State did their checks and then, as the Constitution mandates, Electoral votes were allocated per those checked and re-checked numbers. That went on across America.
And, with some contention in some geographies re-checks were done again, audits were performed with great effort and cost. And the results were the results. Unchanged from prior to the audits.
And thus, critically, the checked, re-checked again numbers provided the legitimacy and, hold for it.....the 'proof' that the results were valid.
In contradistinction, the losing side has objected to and claimed that all of that was wrong.
Critically though, the American Constitutional process doesn't believe as they do. American jurisprudence .....doesn't believe as they do.
So, with all that said, good poster 9Doc, it is NOT the requirement of the winning side to prove you are wrong.
It is your side's responsibility, your side's requirement to prove that you are right.
To date, after nearly 18 months, ...and 60 courts, and nearly 100 judges.....the losing side has been impotent and unsuccessful in making a persuasive case before our courts .....including up to the highest court in the land.
In short, the requirement that good poster 9Doc, and others, needs to perform is .....is to "prove otherwise" to the Constitutionally mandated count that was legally established with the approval of the Electoral votes during the evening of January 6th in Washington, DC.
Go!
Don't derail the thread.
