Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
- Thread starter
- #101
You're right. The Actual Law that Loretta Lynch is citing says absolutely nothing about imagined & self-diagnosed gender identity. Nor could it be construed that way to the demise of the real, actual female sex behind doors marked "women" (17 million of whom are rape victims who would suffer PTSD if a person of the male sex was in there with them) Moreover, Justice Ginsburg also said that equal rights for the sexes in no way suggested that bathrooms would become unisex.
Lynch has her work cut out for her. No wonder she was very defensive at that press conference last Monday!
From your link:
********
On June 23, 1972, the President signed Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq., into law. Title IX is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity. The principal objective of Title IX is to avoid the use of federal money to support sex discrimination in education programs and to provide individual citizens effective protection against those practices. Title IX applies, with a few specific exceptions, to all aspects of federally funded education programs or activities. In addition to traditional educational institutions such as colleges, universities, and elementary and secondary schools, Title IX also applies to any education or training program operated by a recipient of federal financial assistance. The Department of Education has issued regulations on the requirements of Title IX, 34 C.F.R. § 106.1et seq. The Title IX common rule published on August 30, 2000 covers education program providers/recipients that are funded by other federal agencies.
***********
No words at all about imagination fairyland self-diagnosed "gender-fluid", or games of pretending to be another sex.
Again, EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER HERE FOLKS: This isn't JUST an interest of men wanting access to women's restrooms. It is also a matter of women not wanting them to be there!
I know it's easy to forget the rights and considerations of women all the time in preference to men. But isn't this exactly why Title IX came into being??? The irony.. Loretta Lynch has her head up her ass. I can't wait to see what she produces in clarification on this matter and on the North Carolina lawsuit. She must be sweating right now..
Not to mention the most recent science ready to club her arguments over the head: http://www.usmessageboard.com/threa...rmerly-denounce-sex-change-procedures.484596/
And the fact that Johns Hopkins considers "sex change" operations butchery without science backing it up; and refuses to do them anymore... JHMN: Sexual Healing
“It’s pretty rough surgery; some people consider it mutilating. And, of course, the scientific side of it is pretty damn weak.”
Finally, in 1979, the unit’s then-director, Meyer, published a study questioning certain benefits of the surgery that helped convince the Hopkins hierarchy to eliminate its sex reassignment program entirely.
Last edited: