Your right to bear arms, to defend your life and your property will not be infringed in the least if you have to undergo a thorough and universal background check.sure you are if you are willing to sacrifice one then the others are as meaningless to youNone. How did you conclude that by citing the constitution I was erasing rights?what other rights are you willing to give up
Your right to bear arms is not an absolute. If it were, there would be no restriction no on the type of arms you could bear. If the fully automatic firing system was deemed too dangerous to be on American streets, if that firing system requires special restrictions to obtain, how can we see firing systems as dangerous to shoot up school kids?
Yo Nosmo, you stupid miserable dingle berry
Our right to bear arms is an UNALIENABLE ABSOLUTE - an extra-constitutional natural right.
Not so, but you believe it is true. Prove it, me boy.
How many Jews would have passed Hitler's background check?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
There was no background check, me boy. Because jews and others could not have guns.
At any rate, did you have a point, or are you simply out of ammo?
.
did in fact a non jew could be summary executed for even giving a jew one bullet
the left loves to point out that hitller "relaxed " the gun laws
but they leave out the jew and undesirables problem