Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
News flash, Comrade: Capitalism isn't a system of government. Monarchies can be capitalist. Anarchies can be capitalist. Republics and democracies can be capitalist.Oh so you and Mary think Capitalism is pure and divine but all the other isms are evil?
What ism were we when we were murdering the Indians or enslaving blacks?
All of which were monarchies.Good answer!
Russia, er Stalin sided with NAZI Germany originally. Birds of a feather. Russia sided with Hitler. They invaded say, Poland.
www.usmessageboard.com
Yes. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Agreement was one of convenience for both dictators. Stalin hoped Hitler would get bogged down fighting the English and French, thus wearing all of them out. Then Stalin planned to use his enormous army to conquer all of Europe. He never thought Germany would so quickly take over the continent.When you want to go invading countries, but don't want that big ass military on your ass, you make a pact.
Doesn't mean they sided with each other.
Yes. The Molotov-Ribbentrop Agreement was one of convenience for both dictators. Stalin hoped Hitler would get bogged down fighting the English and French, thus wearing all of them out. Then Stalin planned to use his enormous army to conquer all of Europe. He never thought Germany would so quickly take over the continent.
Then Hitler beat Stalin to the punch, with Operation Barbarossa.
Hitler screwed up not partnering up with Russia. We were lucky they were on our side.
True. Look what Hitler did to Italians. What I’m saying is hitler screwed up by not friending Russia first. Then stab them in the back later.You people are about 15 years behind the information curve. It's been known for some time, thanks to revelations from the Soviet archives, that Stalin had no intention of keeping his pact with Hitler and planned on attacking Germany and the rest of Europe in a matter of months. The reason the Germans were able to capture such huge stockpiles of supplies was that the Russians had staged them in forward areas in preparation for their coming invasion. Read Dr. Sean McMeekin's new book Stalin's War: A New History of World War II. Or, read Viktor Suvorov's 2008 book The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II.
Stalin and Mao had much more time. Hitler’s reign was relatively short. His body count probably would have eclipsed them both combined if he’d had as long as they did.Stalin killed more people than Hitler. Ditto for Mao. Communism starved or persecuted more people than "NAZISM" did. Under Mao: 80 million, under Stalin: 14 million.
Fortunately he offed himself like the pussy he was.
www.usmessageboard.com
The Soviets needed American equipment to defeat Hitler.the US landed in Europe after USSR has already defeated Hitler, just not to miss its share of a pie.
the US contribution in victory over Nazism was insignificant.
the whole US contribution in WWII was insignificant.
except collecting gold for military shipments the US, dod not do much..
How many US troops fought in Pacific at all?
1/20 or 1/30 of Soviet ones in Soviet/German front?
for German/Soviet front all American actions in Pacific ocean would be a local operation..
USSR/German front was as long as US-Canadian border or longer. France is a tiny piece of land and all operations of the Western allies in Europe were local or medium (several biggest of them) if Soviet standards are applied.The Soviets needed American equipment to defeat Hitler.
And of course the Russians mobilized more soldiers than the US. Their country was invaded. We didn’t have to go to Europe at all. We liberated France, Italy and the Low Countries. That’s not “insignificant”. The liberation of Paris alone was one of the greatest triumphs of the Allies.
The western allies were also busy fighting in North Africa, the Middle East and east Asia. If anything, it was the Russians whose operations could be described as local.USSR/German front was as long as US-Canadian border or longer. France is a tiny piece of land and all operations of the Western allies in Europe were local or medium (several biggest of them) if Soviet standards are applied.
lol, in Stalingrad battle alone each side, i. e. Russians and Germans lost more than 1 000 000 soldiers each (USSR - 1,129 mln, Germany - about 1,5 mln) .The western allies were also busy fighting in North Africa, the Middle East and east Asia. If anything, it was the Russians whose operations could be described as local.
the US now has the same dilemma, whome to attack first - China or Russia.True. Look what Hitler did to Italians. What I’m saying is hitler screwed up by not friending Russia first. Then stab them in the back later.
germany had to fight USA and russia. Imagine if russia was on the other side? So in a way tgfr.
