State Bar Investigating Texas Attorney General

[Biff_Poindexter]

Oh look!

It's thrice indicted Ken Paxton

Yup what is it with republicans in Texas?

Do they actually believe that the law doesn't apply to them?

Some of them do, yes.....but to be fair; a politician believing he or she is above the law is a bipartisan thing.

That is true but this guy really has committed a lot of crime.

This isn't the only legal problem he has.

No he hasn't. Neither of you know shit about any of this.

Why can't you refute anything I am saying??

For a "classical liberal" -- you sure do get emotional and put on the cape for Conservatives a lot

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Oh look!

It's thrice indicted Ken Paxton

Partisan politics. You can indict a ham sandwich.

I know the judges on the case. It was initiated here in Collin County. After the now-retired judge passed the case to Judge Angela Tucker (first black judge in collin county and you would probably call her an aunt jemimah or whatever the fuck you assholes call female uncle toms) who then appoint a Houston sitting judge to the case, so the retired judge told me the whole fucking story. It is all bullshit. It will go nowhere, but the stigma will keep Paxton from going higher, so he is making the most of it. Texas will NEVER turn blue because of it.

How come for Obama's whole 8 years there was not a single indictment...

And in Trump's first 8 minutes his admin racked up 80?

Are your saying Obama was just that powerful and Trump and the Republicans are just that weak?

View attachment 499496

I live in Southlake which is not that far away from Collin County.....a sitting Attorney General with 3 indictments isn't a good look no matter how much you try to minimize it or spin it....if the AG was a Democrat -- I guarantee you that you would have a different tune....

Which is funny because you "claim" to be a classical liberal.....

I was speaking specifically about Paxton only.

Now-retired Judge Mark Rucsh told me the entire story after he had (as administrative judge) assigned the case to Angela Tucker (who is very good judge, by the way, love her) and after she had decided that she had ties too close to Paxton (you know he is also from Collin County) so assigned the case to a retired sitting judge out of Houston. When that happened, I sat in Rucsh's chambers for at least an hour where he explained the entire situation, which I can try to sum up like this. Some vindictive ass found a hyper technicality FAR from the legislative intent of the securities act and ran the case through some other agency (DPS or Railroad commission, I can't remember), bypassing the Collin DA, Greg Willis (who was Ken Paxton's college roommate and best friend). The matter was filed in the 416th District Court, for Judge Chris Oldner, who allowed the matter to go to a grand jury, And nothing but political enemies of Paxton made a presentation. It was not a politically smart move by Chris Oldner, because he's now in private practice. They ran him out.

As I said, you can indict a ham sandwich, but the damage is done. The stigma following in Paxton around is going to keep him from doing anything other than being the state AG. (but not Angela Paxton, and everybody better watch out for her. Very skilled politician. Way too "Jesus Nazi" for my tastes, but very talented).

You are in Southlake. You should know about the dude Paxton busted who was running for mayor who sent in 75 mail-in ballots. That dude's going to be sitting in jail for 10 years.

My mistake. The guy was running for mayor in Carrolton, not Southlake.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.da...ted-to-voter-fraud-police-say/?outputType=amp

This is one of several voter fraud cases Paxton pursued leading up to Nov. 2020. The results were AMAZING. Starr County had been blue since the civil war, and OVERWHELMINGLY went to Hillary in 2016, but magically shifted to Trump by a whopping 64%.

But, no voter fraud. Right?

Yea....

So has anyone claimed that million dollar reward Dan Patrick was offering??

Or was that really just him being full of shit and doing theater?

By the way.....from that same Ken Paxton....


"The Texas attorney general’s office spent nearly twice as much time working on voter fraud cases this year as it did in 2018 — logging more than 22,000 staff hours — yet resolved just 16 prosecutions, half as many as two years ago, records show. In its 15 years of its existence, the unit has prosecuted a few dozen cases in which offenders received jail time, none of them involving widespread fraud."

Texas AG Ken Paxton’s beefed-up 2020 voter fraud unit closed 16 minor cases, all in Harris County

The voter fraud unit closed twice as many cases in 2018, before eight sergeants and two...

www.houstonchronicle.com

Voter Fraud is hard to detect and prosecute. What do you want me to say?

But, Starr County and now Harlingen is evidence that it is working. You Dems can't keep cheating like you have been.

How is it hard to detect when you folks keep claiming there is widespread voter fraud all over the place??

Having dozens and dozens of government institutions spending millions in taxpayer dollars to find all of this fraud and coming up with zero

And your excuse is -- well, that is because its hard to find.....

But according to you, they can indict a ham sandwich but can't indict anyone or any entity for widespread fraud?

 

[Dana7360]

The excuses and justifications for the crimes of the Texas AG are disgusting.

The so called law and order party. LOL. What a lame lie.

I'm so not surprised.

 

[TNHarley]

Rubes love their political theater

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Oh look!

It's thrice indicted Ken Paxton

Yup what is it with republicans in Texas?

Do they actually believe that the law doesn't apply to them?

Some of them do, yes.....but to be fair; a politician believing he or she is above the law is a bipartisan thing.

That is true but this guy really has committed a lot of crime.

This isn't the only legal problem he has.

No he hasn't. Neither of you know shit about any of this.

Why can't you refute anything I am saying??

For a "classical liberal" -- you sure do get emotional and put on the cape for Conservatives a lot

What do you want me to say? I told you what I know.

There are a lot of things Paxton and I do not agree on. He is stopping a bunch of federal bullshit, so I am liking the work he is doing.

I can still be a classic liberal AND give props where due.

And the number 1 threat to my liberty recently has been that of the hard leftists. So, again, what do you want me to say?

Get your Dems to stop shitting on individual liberty and I might consider some of the candidates.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The excuses and justifications for the crimes of the Texas AG are disgusting.

The so called law and order party. LOL. What a lame lie.

I'm so not surprised.

mad

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Oh look!

It's thrice indicted Ken Paxton

Yup what is it with republicans in Texas?

Do they actually believe that the law doesn't apply to them?

Some of them do, yes.....but to be fair; a politician believing he or she is above the law is a bipartisan thing.

That is true but this guy really has committed a lot of crime.

This isn't the only legal problem he has.

No he hasn't. Neither of you know shit about any of this.

Why can't you refute anything I am saying??

For a "classical liberal" -- you sure do get emotional and put on the cape for Conservatives a lot

What do you want me to say? I told you what I know.

There are a lot of things Paxton and I do not agree on. He is stopping a bunch of federal bullshit, so I am liking the work he is doing.

I can still be a classic liberal AND give props where due.

And the number 1 threat to my liberty recently has been that of the hard leftists. So, again, what do you want me to say?

Get your Dems to stop shitting on individual liberty and I might consider some of the candidates.

How have you lost your liberty to leftists??


Real examples, not feelings....

Examples like.......The Patriotic Act...did leftists force that on you?

Denial of Civil Rights...has leftists launched that on you??

Or do you think not being able to call gay people fags (which you can still do) or discriminating against transgender people is an example of the "left" taking your liberties

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

How is it hard to detect when you folks keep claiming there is widespread voter fraud all over the place??

Why do you care, then, Biff? If it's not wide spread, do your little touchdown dance and leave. You're just mad because Paxton going after fraud caused a BIG SHIFT in border counties. So, I will take it.

Having dozens and dozens of government institutions spending millions in taxpayer dollars to find all of this fraud and coming up with zero

So, now you are worried about government spending? Did you pipe up when Congress wasted millions to impeach FORMER President Trump?

We can't say there is no voter fraud without putting forth an effort to detect it. The REAL question is....why does it make you so mad?

And your excuse is -- well, that is because its hard to find.....

But according to you, they can indict a ham sandwich but can't indict anyone or any entity for widespread fraud?

Wow. What the fuck? You have no idea how the process works, do you?

Those have NOTHING to do with each other...at all. It's hard to find out if and who is doing voter fraud. You need to identify a suspect first. Once identified, the indictment process is nothing more than a prosecutor presenting one side of the evidence.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

How have you lost your liberty to leftists??

I'll just focus on ONE liberty. The one that protects all the others and the one that you commies are DESPARATE to remove.

Example 1: 1994 Assault Weapons Ban - I could just stop right there, given the repeated attempts to REINSTATE that POS.

Then, we ALMOST lost the INDIVIDUAL right to firearms because THE LEFT wanted to make it collective right and we had to fight you motherfucking assholes ALL THE WAY TO THE SCOTUS.

SO, fuck you. If we're not constantly fighting YOU LEFTISTS, we will lose it all.

Or do you think not being able to call gay people fags (which you can still do) or discriminating against transgender people is an example of the "left" taking your liberties

Hold on. Do you think I should NOT be allowed to call gay dudes fags?

The defense rests...

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

How is it hard to detect when you folks keep claiming there is widespread voter fraud all over the place??

Why do you care, then, Biff? If it's not wide spread, do your little touchdown dance and leave. You're just mad because Paxton going after fraud caused a BIG SHIFT in border counties. So, I will take it.

Having dozens and dozens of government institutions spending millions in taxpayer dollars to find all of this fraud and coming up with zero

So, now you are worried about government spending? Did you pipe up when Congress wasted millions to impeach FORMER President Trump?

We can't say there is no voter fraud without putting forth an effort to detect it. The REAL question is....why does it make you so mad?

And your excuse is -- well, that is because its hard to find.....

But according to you, they can indict a ham sandwich but can't indict anyone or any entity for widespread fraud?

Wow. What the fuck? You have no idea how the process works, do you?

Those have NOTHING to do with each other...at all. It's hard to find out if and who is doing voter fraud. You need to identify a suspect first. Once identified, the indictment process is nothing more than a prosecutor presenting one side of the evidence.

^Temper tantrum ^

Is it frustrating having to concede that much of the shit you morons try to use to justify your voting restriction bills -- was all a lie?

But it's cool......the same justifications you "Republicans" use now are the EXACT SAME justifications that "Democrats" used 50 and 60 years ago while trying to do the same thing.....restrict voting rights....

Seems like it ain't political party they all had in common....but political ideology.....or in other words, being conservatives

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

How have you lost your liberty to leftists??

I'll just focus on ONE liberty. The one that protects all the others and the one that you commies are DESPARATE to remove.

Example 1: 1994 Assault Weapons Ban - I could just stop right there, given the repeated attempts to REINSTATE that POS.

Then, we ALMOST lost the INDIVIDUAL right to firearms because THE LEFT wanted to make it collective right and we had to fight you motherfucking assholes ALL THE WAY TO THE SCOTUS.

SO, fuck you. If we're not constantly fighting YOU LEFTISTS, we will lose it all.

Or do you think not being able to call gay people fags (which you can still do) or discriminating against transgender people is an example of the "left" taking your liberties

Hold on. Do you think I should NOT be allowed to call gay dudes fags?

The defense rests...

Gun control laws were originally proposed to target black folks...so I am not a fan of gun control laws....which is why you can't point to single comment I ever made advocating for it

Difference is.....when gun control laws EXPLICITLY TARGETED BLACK FOLKS -- it wasn't the "Liberals" who were doing it......


But acknowledging the racist origins of gun control bills tends to trigger cucks like yourself who pretend gun control bills started in 1994

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Is it frustrating having to concede that much of the shit you morons try to use to justify your voting restriction bills -- was all a lie?

Nope. It was obviously NOT a lie. See Starr and Zapata counties.

^Temper tantrum ^

Spin it anyway makes you feel less inferior.

But it's cool......the same justifications you "Republicans" use now are the EXACT SAME justifications that "Democrats" used 50 and 60 years ago while trying to do the same thing.....restrict voting rights....

Trying to retroflash us back to 1964, before we were born, and accuse us of being retro-racists AGAIN?

Seems like it ain't political party they all had in common....but political ideology.....or in other words, being conservatives

That word has about as much meaning as "liberal" has now.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Gun control laws were originally proposed to target black folks...so I am not a fan of gun control laws....which is why you can't point to single comment I ever made advocating for it

I agree. And THAT is a shining example of REAL racism which I find repulsive.

But you apparently vote for people who do advocate for gun control. Why?

Difference is.....when gun control laws EXPLICITLY TARGETED BLACK FOLKS -- it wasn't the "Liberals" who were doing it......

I don't disagree with you one bit. It was 100% racist and I have said so countless times. You and I are on the same page.

But acknowledging the racist origins of gun control bills tends to trigger cucks like yourself who pretend gun control bills started in 1994

Do my comments above appear as though I would get triggered by acknowledging the racist origin of gun control?