Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it wouldn't. The far right and nativists in the GOP would cheer. So would the prison guard unions you support.
Because we have prison capacity, federal, state, and county prisons of 2,266,000 and we are busting at the seams.... there is no space for the 11 million.The EO is to force Congress to act.
I am sure the Dems want Congress to act "poorly."
Why doesn't he just round them up and put them in prison? That would also force them to act.
If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Which is why Congress will most likely pass no immigration legislation that the president will sign.The EO is to force Congress to act.
I am sure the Dems want Congress to act "poorly."
Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Every law enforcement agency, including the agencies that enforce immigration laws, has “prosecutorial discretion” — the power to decide whom to investigate, arrest, detain, charge, and prosecute. Homeland Security can legally prioritize and delay prosecution and deportation. Immigration laws gives the administration wide latitude in granting work permits.
Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Every law enforcement agency, including the agencies that enforce immigration laws, has “prosecutorial discretion” — the power to decide whom to investigate, arrest, detain, charge, and prosecute. Homeland Security can legally prioritize and delay prosecution and deportation. Immigration laws gives the administration wide latitude in granting work permits.
Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Every law enforcement agency, including the agencies that enforce immigration laws, has “prosecutorial discretion” — the power to decide whom to investigate, arrest, detain, charge, and prosecute. Homeland Security can legally prioritize and delay prosecution and deportation. Immigration laws gives the administration wide latitude in granting work permits.
Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Every law enforcement agency, including the agencies that enforce immigration laws, has “prosecutorial discretion” — the power to decide whom to investigate, arrest, detain, charge, and prosecute. Homeland Security can legally prioritize and delay prosecution and deportation. Immigration laws gives the administration wide latitude in granting work permits.
Executive Orders and Executive Actions can be reversed by Congress.
Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Every law enforcement agency, including the agencies that enforce immigration laws, has “prosecutorial discretion” — the power to decide whom to investigate, arrest, detain, charge, and prosecute. Homeland Security can legally prioritize and delay prosecution and deportation. Immigration laws gives the administration wide latitude in granting work permits.
So based on your interpretation, a President can take any law that has been passed that he doesn't happen to agree with, and through executive order say ..... It's not what I prefer to see, change it, and in the mean time I just don't feel the law should be enforced. I mean, what's to stop a Republican president simply demanding change and refusing to enforce Obamacare on his own, without any "checks and balance" of government power?
What Constitutional article and section specifically gives him that power?
The Republicans in congress ARE going to give them amnesty so they can garner the Hispanic vote.... the writing is on the wall.... I read a Briebart article yesterday on it, which pretty much showed how congressional leadership has set it up, to be so...The Democrats first lost the House. Then in the next midterm election the Senate, with the Republicans gained the second largest House majority in our nation's history. This looks more like a desperate plea by this President to try and use whatever means he can, to get another voting block to support putting his party back into power.
Yep, with a 2/3 vote of both the House and Senate Republicans can pass legislation to nullifies it and overrides a presidential veto. However, since Republicans have only 56% of the House and 54% of the Senate, there is almost no chance of it happening.Executive Orders and Presidential Memorandums carry the wait of law but they are not laws. Executive Actions are orders that are within the scope of existing law. Unlike laws congress passes, these actions by the president are temporary and last only as long as the president is in office. They are not laws nor are they changes to the law.If you say don't believe it, after the info has been posted on the Board, as it has, then, yes, you do need to refute it with data.
Hint: it does not exist.
Jake, when have YOU been able to provide any data? Seriously. "Information from the board" may be all you can say if you can't even defend your own position.
Shakles, I have read all of the information available. You have not. You can't compete.
The EO can't be shaken in court. Watch as your arguments are dismissed.
I figure from the evidence to the conclusions; you begin with a conclusion and then fit evidence to it. The EO is an EO. It is what it is.
That's why you always fail.
Why don't you present YOUR evidence on why you think Obama's executive order still respects those immigrants who came here legally and would treat ALL immigrants the same under this provision. Why do you think it should still stand, and where it specifically states in the Constitution that this President has the executive authority to simply change laws that he doesn't agree with? Really Jake, anyone can make a small comment over what someone else said without backing it up.
I do respect Care4all for her input in presenting an interesting argument regarding the reason for the need to address the issue, and is one of among a few here willing to have a real discussion about it through an opposing view.
Every law enforcement agency, including the agencies that enforce immigration laws, has “prosecutorial discretion” — the power to decide whom to investigate, arrest, detain, charge, and prosecute. Homeland Security can legally prioritize and delay prosecution and deportation. Immigration laws gives the administration wide latitude in granting work permits.
Executive Orders and Executive Actions can be reversed by Congress.
they already have AMNESTYThe Republicans in congress ARE going to give them amnesty so they can garner the Hispanic vote.... the writing is on the wall.... I read a Briebart article yesterday on it, which pretty much showed how congressional leadership has set it up, to be so...The Democrats first lost the House. Then in the next midterm election the Senate, with the Republicans gained the second largest House majority in our nation's history. This looks more like a desperate plea by this President to try and use whatever means he can, to get another voting block to support putting his party back into power.
true story
huh? what do you mean?they already have AMNESTYThe Republicans in congress ARE going to give them amnesty so they can garner the Hispanic vote.... the writing is on the wall.... I read a Briebart article yesterday on it, which pretty much showed how congressional leadership has set it up, to be so...The Democrats first lost the House. Then in the next midterm election the Senate, with the Republicans gained the second largest House majority in our nation's history. This looks more like a desperate plea by this President to try and use whatever means he can, to get another voting block to support putting his party back into power.
true story
Republicans are gonna give them an offer to pay taxes like the rest of the people that work in this country.
