Stephanopoulos-Gate.Does This Mean That Previous And Future President Polls Will Be Under Scrutiny?

[Rexx Taylor]

Then again, no one ever takes polls coming from ABC/NBC/CNN seriously anyway! but now that we have found out that "Georgy-Poos" has been donating to the Clintons, it should give us a reason to doubt any Presidential Poll coming especially from ABC. Wasn't it ABC that has kept Bush and Clinton ahead in most of their polling this year? And yet when we all hear that Bush and Clinton are the clear leaders for their parties going into 2016, who isn't saying, "Yah Right, Clinton and Bush are ahead?" Is Bush way ahead now? Hillary ahead in all the purple states? Lets just see if they keep taking polls keeping Hillary way ahead of Cruz, Walker and Rubio. Will anyone believe ABC anymore?

 

[Kosh]

ABC is owned by Disney!

Walt Disney Co Summary OpenSecrets

 

[Rexx Taylor]

ABC is owned by Disney!

Walt Disney Co Summary OpenSecrets

u have to wonder if George takes some of the polls, automatically gives Hillary 50% over anyone.

 

[Kosh]

ABC is owned by Disney!

Walt Disney Co Summary OpenSecrets

u have to wonder if George takes some of the polls, automatically gives Hillary 50% over anyone.

I have never believed these polls regardless what they show, because they can be easily manipulated to show what anyone wants them to..

Polls maybe once upon a time be a good tool, but now they are owned by certain organizations. Far left organizations will show the people are against what ever the current narrative is.

I have always considered all these "scientific" polls nothing more than opinion polls..

 

[Rexx Taylor]

I think George is 65% Female, 15% Male, 20% Mouse.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

ABC is owned by Disney!

Walt Disney Co Summary OpenSecrets

well george is out, i guess then that Chelsea Clinton will be one of the debate moderators.

 

[MisterBeale]

But then, when they announce who won the election, even though none of you voted for them, you still all belive the MSM media.

Why? Because they are the establishment media, and they don't lie. Right? And it would be a. . . . a . . . . conspiracy if the let the election officials announced and seated the wrong person, right?

It'll be a globalist. Count on it.

 

[francoHFW]

It's a CHARITY fer chrissake...lol

 

[Rexx Taylor]

I am beginning to wonder if George Crapadopolis is also an alien like James Carville and Henry Waxman.

 

[Zander]

Stephanopoulis is Clinton hack. He worked for Bill and Hillary Clinton and for that reason alone he cannot be "objective".

Now it turns out he donated money to The Clinton Foundation and never disclosed it? Even when he was covering the foundation? He's just as bad as Brian Williams. He should resign.

 

[Zander]

I wonder how many other "reporters” have given money to the Clinton Foundation........

 

[NLT]

It's a CHARITY fer chrissake...lol

a charity to fill bill and hildabeasts bank account

 

[Dragonlady]

Paranoid conspiracy theories.

Gawd you people are pathetic.

 

[Pogo]

Paranoid conspiracy theories.

Gawd you people are pathetic.

There's no link but I happen to have heard exactly where he got this drivel. Was looking for a baseball game tonight and came across Sean Hannity. Sure enough, ten minutes later it shows up here, word for word, obedient puppets on the job. God forbid they should ever come up with a thought of their own -- nah, just parrot the radio. "Yes master... I hear and obey..."

"Stephanopoulosgate" my ass.....

 

[Wildman]

Will anyone believe ABC anymore?

well of course, all the mind numbed liberfools will swallow any thing the alphabet non-news liars say.

anyone care to tabulate the USMB luberturds here will quote them ?

 

[Wildman]

I have always considered all these "scientific" polls nothing more than opinion polls..

yes, they are opinion polls designed to in the ignorant, stupid, liars ..., oooh hell !! just call them luberturds and be done with it.

 

[Wildman]

I think George is 65% Female, 15% Male, 20% Mouse.

male mouse ?

 

[MisterBeale]

It's a CHARITY fer chrissake...lol

If you want to believe that, go on believing that. What was the Clinton campaign tune again? Hey don't stop. . . .



But getting caught up in a fantasy is no substitute for reality. Aren't you the one that is always telling folks not to get duped? The Clinton's are far better at duping people than the Republicans ever were. And the Republican's are pretty bad, aren't they?

Top Clinton Foundation Official: “This Is Not Charity”
Top Clinton Foundation Official This Is Not Charity

"Bill Clinton’s right-hand man, the one who helped design and build the Clinton Foundation from the ground up, explicitly stated that the foundation’s efforts are commercial and not charitable in nature. If Bill Clinton trusted him to accurately characterize the foundation’s activities, shouldn’t we?"


After all, didn't their campaign manager end up working where? Ehm. . . . Fox news?

 

[francoHFW]

It's a CHARITY fer chrissake...lol

If you want to believe that, go on believing that. What was the Clinton campaign tune again? Hey don't stop. . . .



But getting caught up in a fantasy is no substitute for reality. Aren't you the one that is always telling folks not to get duped? The Clinton's are far better at duping people than the Republicans ever were. And the Republican's are pretty bad, aren't they?

Top Clinton Foundation Official: “This Is Not Charity”
Top Clinton Foundation Official This Is Not Charity

"Bill Clinton’s right-hand man, the one who helped design and build the Clinton Foundation from the ground up, explicitly stated that the foundation’s efforts are commercial and not charitable in nature. If Bill Clinton trusted him to accurately characterize the foundation’s activities, shouldn’t we?"


After all, didn't their campaign manager end up working where? Ehm. . . . Fox news?

Oh yes it is...from your bs link...

Magaziner was referring to the energy and climate change activities of the Clinton Foundation. Back in 2007, when Magaziner was interviewed at length about the organization’s activities by reporter Jonathan Rauch, the Clinton Foundation was still a singular entity. It had not yet spun off its pharmaceutical purchasing and distribution business into the separate Clinton Health Access Initiative, or CHAI (CHAI was officially spun off and separated from the Clinton Foundation in January of 2010, according to the group’s tax filings).
By 2012, the Clinton Foundation–the entity that officially added Hillary Clinton to its board in 2013–had ceased its programmatic pharmaceutical efforts entirely. After the 2010 spin-off, CHAI–on whose board Hillary does not sit–took complete control of those activities. The energy and climate efforts, however, stayed with the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation as part of the “Clinton Climate Initiative.”
The Clinton Foundation’s 2013 tax filings characterize the Clinton Climate Initiative as one of the organization’s top charitable programmatic efforts, behind the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI), which focuses almost exclusively on planning and funding CGI’s annual meeting, and the Clinton Presidential Center, which funds the former president’s official library in Little Rock, Arkansas.

 

[francoHFW]

Stephanopoulos Gave to Foundation. So What -- NYMag

In the absence of a material conflict, is there some symbolic conflict? It is hard to imagine what. The Clinton Foundation has taken on nefarious connotations owing to conflict-of-interest problems that don’t implicate Stephanopoulos. But it is, after all, a charity. It used to have non-partisan overtones.In the heat of the 2012 election, Mitt Romney spoke at the Clinton Global Initiative. News Corporation Foundation and Donald Trump, for goodness sake, donated to it.
Stephanopoulos’s defense — that he just wanted to donate to the Foundation’s work on AIDS prevention and deforestation — seems 100 percent persuasive. He is the victim of the ethical taint of the Clintons’ poorly handled business dealings, combined with an underlying right-wing suspicion of the liberal media, but what his critics have yet to produce is a coherent case against him.