Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not the question you posed.Just say it. Don’t be a bitch. Say it.
Do you condemn that part of the Oath Keepers that is anti-fascist? Very simple question. Yet you struggle so massively.
Sigh. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracyThey are using "seditious conspiracy" to allege the man not only communicated his desire to harm the government, but also had the ability to do it.
I pay far more attention to these things than you obviously do.
Lock their sorry asses up in Guantanamo and throw away the keys!
Meager is the idiot. We aren’t talking about taking action against an enemy force. Just keep throwing shot in the wall, meager. Some of it will stick.He's an idiot.
Unless you are government sanctioned, any action you take against an enemy force, you would be ruled an unlawful combatant. And have no legal protections under the Geneva conventions.
That's not the standard. Because as they say "ignorance of the law is no excuse"
I dont work for the DOJ, asshat. Is this the first time you've heard of a case take a year to make arrests? You cant be that ignorant, can you?Explain it to the judge. Call him/her “dummy” for not thinking like you.
Or they would rather take a plea deal for a lesser crime with a guaranteed lesser sentence than take their chances on going to jail for 10-20 years. Less than 8% of people charged with Federal Crimes go to trial. Everyone isn't flipping on someone else.Which means they will be giving someone higher than themselves up in exchange.
Sigh. 18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
See, no mention of guns. But they did "conspire.....by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States". That's gonna be pretty easy to prove with everything the government has on these traitors. They can say bye bye for 20 years. My guess is they will plead guilty, just like the rest of the traitors.
The oath keeper gang leader, being the dummy that he is, sent several texts and left messages on websites for all to read. Here's a snippet of what the feds have:There is no ignorance because there is no provable intent.
I didn't read the indictment, but from reports they have the receipts for a whole arsenal of weapons, ammunition, and para-military gear, and transports to carry out the insurrection.Uh no. They have to prove he had the weapons at all.
The indictment describes Rhodes as hand-picking a top deputy, known as “PERSON TEN,” to be the “operations leader” for the group on Jan. 6.
That's why they were arrested. But dont tell us proving anything in a court of law actually means anything to you. If found guilty, you'll simply say the judicial system is run by communists and all the jurors were communists or some such nonsense. Because you dont actually believe in the rule of law.Mens rea, once again.
And if you know what the government actually has, other than his communicating things like "the next Lexington is coming" or "it's time for us to take action" via an obscure social messaging app... then the government has nothing. Lots of political groups use similar grandeose phraseology, such as "take action." That does not imply they are taking violent action.
The government needs to provide proof he planned out a distribution network of any kind to furnish weapons to those of like mind, or that he intended to act in the manner it alleges.
Quoting the law means nothing to me unless you can prove beyond a reasonable doubt it was violated. And you can't.
I didn't read the indictment, but from reports they have the receipts for a whole arsenal of weapons, ammunition, and para-military gear, and transports to carry out the insurrection.
You do realize that when you make an arrest you need to charge them? Have they all or anyone of them been charged with being a traitor or with Insurrection? Yes or no?I dont work for the DOJ, asshat. Is this the first time you've heard of a case take a year to make arrests? You cant be that ignorant, can you?
Boy you sure are stupid. Where are weapons mentioned in the law code I provided? You're fucking slower than most of the right wing nut jobs on here, and that's saying something. Listen we're not holding a trial here I dont have to prove shit to you. That is the DOJ's job. Your tax dollars at work!So, does that imply he intended to take violent action against the government? Does that prove he orchestrated a weapons distribution network?
Seditious conspiracy is the charge. you know that.You do realize that when you make an arrest you need to charge them? Have they all or anyone of them been charged with being a traitor or with Insurrection? Yes or no?
That's why they were arrested. But dont tell us proving anything in a court of law actually means anything to you. If found guilty, you'll simply say the judicial system is run by communists and all the jurors were communists or some such nonsense. Because you dont actually believe in the rule of law.
You're right I cant. But the DOJ can. And that's all that matter.
You are either taking up arms against an enemy force, or against the US or allied force. You need government sanction for either one, or you would suffer being an unprotected illegal combatant in the former, and a seditionist in the later.Meager is the idiot. We aren’t talking about taking action against an enemy force. Just keep throwing shot in the wall, meager. Some of it will stick.
Where are weapons mentioned in the law code I provided?
