Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know you just want to deny the rich kids from that awesome "opportunity". Why is that?
Oh right, you wont answer that
It's not relevant he says. Yes, Seriously.
I know, its hard for him to explain it with a mouth full of elitist dick. He worships even the rich kids who didnt earn a dime because as you notice he believes the rich to just be better than everyone else
It's not relevant he says. Yes, Seriously.
I know, its hard for him to explain it with a mouth full of elitist dick. He worships even the rich kids who didnt earn a dime because as you notice he believes the rich to just be better than everyone else
Not sure where you invented that. Probably projection for your own inferiority.
The topic here is having poor kids on assistance do some kind of work in exchange for benefits. Do you have an issue with working in exchange for benefits?
Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.I know, its hard for him to explain it with a mouth full of elitist dick. He worships even the rich kids who didnt earn a dime because as you notice he believes the rich to just be better than everyone else
Not sure where you invented that. Probably projection for your own inferiority.
The topic here is having poor kids on assistance do some kind of work in exchange for benefits. Do you have an issue with working in exchange for benefits?
The way I know that is you have yet to say that you DONT believe that. See, normal human behavior says that when someone is accused of something they havent done they deny it. You instead have yet to deny it, you ask how I came to that conclusion.
If working is an opportunity why are you denying rich kids this opportunity? Dont rich kids need to learn stuff like value and work? Or just the poor ones?
Tell me why segregation is good
Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.Not sure where you invented that. Probably projection for your own inferiority.
The topic here is having poor kids on assistance do some kind of work in exchange for benefits. Do you have an issue with working in exchange for benefits?
The way I know that is you have yet to say that you DONT believe that. See, normal human behavior says that when someone is accused of something they havent done they deny it. You instead have yet to deny it, you ask how I came to that conclusion.
If working is an opportunity why are you denying rich kids this opportunity? Dont rich kids need to learn stuff like value and work? Or just the poor ones?
Tell me why segregation is good
The question is whether kids on assistance should be made to do chores around school to help pay for that assistance. What is your view and why?
Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.Not sure where you invented that. Probably projection for your own inferiority.
The topic here is having poor kids on assistance do some kind of work in exchange for benefits. Do you have an issue with working in exchange for benefits?
The way I know that is you have yet to say that you DONT believe that. See, normal human behavior says that when someone is accused of something they havent done they deny it. You instead have yet to deny it, you ask how I came to that conclusion.
If working is an opportunity why are you denying rich kids this opportunity? Dont rich kids need to learn stuff like value and work? Or just the poor ones?
Tell me why segregation is good
The question is whether kids on assistance should be made to do chores around school to help pay for that assistance. What is your view and why?
Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.The way I know that is you have yet to say that you DONT believe that. See, normal human behavior says that when someone is accused of something they havent done they deny it. You instead have yet to deny it, you ask how I came to that conclusion.
If working is an opportunity why are you denying rich kids this opportunity? Dont rich kids need to learn stuff like value and work? Or just the poor ones?
Tell me why segregation is good
The question is whether kids on assistance should be made to do chores around school to help pay for that assistance. What is your view and why?
Yeah except I said "You beat your wife" and you replied
"How do you know?"
Additionally you are deflecting away from the answer. If you didnt believe it it would be easy to answer. Its human nature and you're not fooling anyone
PS. Go fuck yourself. I'm not answering your stupid ass question. It's called doing the Rabbi
You think poor peopel should just be given everything for free? Is that your position? No wonder personal responsibility is so low.Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.The way I know that is you have yet to say that you DONT believe that. See, normal human behavior says that when someone is accused of something they havent done they deny it. You instead have yet to deny it, you ask how I came to that conclusion.
If working is an opportunity why are you denying rich kids this opportunity? Dont rich kids need to learn stuff like value and work? Or just the poor ones?
Tell me why segregation is good
The question is whether kids on assistance should be made to do chores around school to help pay for that assistance. What is your view and why?
Oh, so you think all kids should be made to work? Or is this you playing your semantics games again?
If you think all kids should be made to work, where is your post stating that the OP is wrong and unfair to single out some kids and not apply these same lessons to all the kids. Why haven't you done that?
I see no problem with having a system that helps teach that there is no such thing is a "free" lunch.
I see no problem with having a system that helps teach that there is no such thing is a "free" lunch.
Well, the place to start isn't with the already traumatized children.
There are plenty of other fixes which need to be done.
How about the farm subsidies congress members and their families rake in?
College students are also there to study. But if I understand the US correctly many of those students who do not have rich parents work, either in the college or nearby. And no one finds this in the least demeaning. So what exactly is the difference?
You think poor peopel should just be given everything for free? Is that your position? No wonder personal responsibility is so low.Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.
The question is whether kids on assistance should be made to do chores around school to help pay for that assistance. What is your view and why?
Oh, so you think all kids should be made to work? Or is this you playing your semantics games again?
If you think all kids should be made to work, where is your post stating that the OP is wrong and unfair to single out some kids and not apply these same lessons to all the kids. Why haven't you done that?
College students are also there to study. But if I understand the US correctly many of those students who do not have rich parents work, either in the college or nearby. And no one finds this in the least demeaning. So what exactly is the difference?
You don't see the difference between organizing a work detail of impoverished 6-year-olds versus an adult who is voluntarily going to college voluntarily working to pay for his education?
Yes sir, it has been shown that young, poor kids are already at an educational disadvantage. Of course with no good education, you might as well have them sweep the floors. Call it on the job training.
Cause that's about the best jobs they will find with no good education.
And you rethugs think that the Dems promote class distinctions. You rethugs want to train the underclass starting in what, first grade?
Zeke, you certainly know about lack of education first hand.
No one is denying anyone an education. Kids on assistance will get the exact same education as those not. The difference is they will learn that being on assistance comes with a price. It's called "responsibility." You should try it sometime.
You think poor peopel should just be given everything for free? Is that your position? No wonder personal responsibility is so low.Oh, so you think all kids should be made to work? Or is this you playing your semantics games again?
If you think all kids should be made to work, where is your post stating that the OP is wrong and unfair to single out some kids and not apply these same lessons to all the kids. Why haven't you done that?
And now try answering the actual question. Is it really that difficult?
College students are also there to study. But if I understand the US correctly many of those students who do not have rich parents work, either in the college or nearby. And no one finds this in the least demeaning. So what exactly is the difference?
You don't see the difference between organizing a work detail of impoverished 6-year-olds versus an adult who is voluntarily going to college voluntarily working to pay for his education?
Who's talking about work details for impoverished 6 yr olds? Only you.
Yes sir, it has been shown that young, poor kids are already at an educational disadvantage. Of course with no good education, you might as well have them sweep the floors. Call it on the job training.
Cause that's about the best jobs they will find with no good education.
And you rethugs think that the Dems promote class distinctions. You rethugs want to train the underclass starting in what, first grade?
Zeke, you certainly know about lack of education first hand.
No one is denying anyone an education. Kids on assistance will get the exact same education as those not. The difference is they will learn that being on assistance comes with a price. It's called "responsibility." You should try it sometime.
They'll learn that the powers-that-be resent them and begrudge them having scraps, and they'll be easy targets for the criminal element in their neighborhood who offer them a chance to feel like somebody.
You think poor peopel should just be given everything for free? Is that your position? No wonder personal responsibility is so low.
And now try answering the actual question. Is it really that difficult?
What was the actual question again? When did I stop beating my wife?
Uh no. Once again you are wrong. Saying "I do not beat my wife" implies the opposite. I've already posted that all kids should learn responsibility. So you are wrong there.
The question is whether kids on assistance should be made to do chores around school to help pay for that assistance. What is your view and why?
Yeah except I said "You beat your wife" and you replied
"How do you know?"
Additionally you are deflecting away from the answer. If you didnt believe it it would be easy to answer. Its human nature and you're not fooling anyone
PS. Go fuck yourself. I'm not answering your stupid ass question. It's called doing the Rabbi
i.e. you cannot debate the actual issue and can only throw ad homs around. Why is this not surprising to me? Get back to me when you have some education and skills.
Please point out which post of mine said that. I'll wait.And now try answering the actual question. Is it really that difficult?
What was the actual question again? When did I stop beating my wife?
Why don't you think the rich kids should have to work at school just like the poor kids?
Yeah except I said "You beat your wife" and you replied
"How do you know?"
Additionally you are deflecting away from the answer. If you didnt believe it it would be easy to answer. Its human nature and you're not fooling anyone
PS. Go fuck yourself. I'm not answering your stupid ass question. It's called doing the Rabbi
i.e. you cannot debate the actual issue and can only throw ad homs around. Why is this not surprising to me? Get back to me when you have some education and skills.
The issue isnt what you want it to be. My issue is that you see work as a good thing only for the less fortunate.
