Still wondering if Barr is a Trump STOOGE???

[nat4900]

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

 

[kyzr]

A SCOTUS sear"? As in burns the democrats asses?
Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. Another Nat troll thread bites the dust...

 

[dudmuck]

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS sear with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

So, now the president (and all federal officials) can now accept bribes from foreign governments, so long as its through their private corporations?

 

[Jitss617]

Schiff should be very worried tonight,, obama, rice, brennon .. tick tic toc

 

[impuretrash]

You were deeply invested in that Russia collusion thing, huh?

 

[boedicca]

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

The stooge in this thread is you, bub.

Just sayin'.

 

[nat4900]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

 

[Jitss617]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

We have a gift for you.. kiss my white ass, 6 more years of trump

 

[boedicca]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.

 

[OKTexas]

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS sear with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

So, now the president (and all federal officials) can now accept bribes from foreign governments, so long as its through their private corporations?

Paying market rate for a service is not a bribe, get back to me when they start paying multiples of the market rate.

.

 

[kyzr]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

Its in the courts, any bets? No? Just keep whining while the Law backs Trump.
Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

 

[Dick Foster]

A

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

And this is what full blown Trump derangement syndrome looks like. You've sure got it bad.

 

[Rustic]

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

... and still no Russian connection

 

[Siete]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

Goldilocks and his Cartel could crap in RW's coffins, and they would thank them for the attention.

 

[WillowTree]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

So why dew ewe hang out with cult members? Ewe a cultist?

 

[boedicca]

Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .

Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO

 

[nat4900]

I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.

Above, a perfect example why fuckheads strongly believe that any defense of Trump MUST include an attack of Hillary, and that maybe TWO wrongs are just fine.......LOL

 

[Auld Phart]

Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS sear with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.

www.theguardian.com/…

So, now the president (and all federal officials) can now accept bribes from foreign governments, so long as its through their private corporations?

Bribes?

what 'bribes'?

 

[nat4900]

So why dew ewe hang out with cult members? Ewe a cultist?

So damn cute...ewe...

Anyway, somebody has to be around to kick your fat asses to the curb.......LOL

 

[boedicca]

I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.

Above, a perfect example why fuckheads strongly believe that any defense of Trump MUST include an attack of Hillary, and that maybe TWO wrongs are just fine.......LOL

A perfect example of the bogus moral equivalency performed by the Progs when they equate perfectly legal business transactions (Trump) with bribes (Clintons).