Still wondering if Barr is a Trump STOOGE???

Here's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.


Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....


Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!
Had Barr said the promm
Here's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.


Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....


Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!
And you conclude Trump definitely had nothing to do with Russian hacking?


The burden is not on me to prove Trump is innocent. The burden is on the accusers to prove his guilt. After $$millions and 2 plus years, you have come up with ZILCH. The evidence that has been unearthed shows that the Obama Admin SPIED on the opposition party's presidential candidate in 2016. You prog loons started this nightmare, and like all liars, you will be caught in your own trap.

Don't move the gaol posts, missy(-: Barr said there was spying despite not showing the probable cause was fudged.
 
Now taking huge pay-outs for the Clinton Foundation at the same time CRITICAL policy decisions need to made --- or having your AIDES give Clinton foreign donors SPECIAL ACCESS and FAVORS could be a crime.. But you're not interested a wit in that --- are you moron???

Atta boy, Trump cult member and ass licker......"defend" your clown by accusing the Clintons of also being corrupt....without a fucking thought that your are actually ADMITTING that your charlatan is ALSO crooked.
man your butt hurt bad
 
Here's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.


Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....


Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!

Well there's a cogent and reasonable response.

The press didn't "spin and spin". Bill Clinton was the most successful and popular President since Eisenhower. Despite doing EVERYTHING that Republicans hate: raising taxes, raising the minimum wage, going after illegal immigrants, and balancing the budget, Americans saw the greatest increase in American jobs, GDP and wealth not seen since the 1950's. Republicans were losing on every score.

The Whitewater Investigation and the Starr Investigation found NOTHING which touched the President or his Administration. The Paula Jones lawsuit was dismissed "with prejudice", and the judge basically calling it frivolous and baseless. The whole "Clintons are corrupt" narrative that the Republicans tried to sell the American people, in part, as revenge for Iran Contra and Watergate.

Two out of three of the Republican Presidents elected since Eisenhower were plagued with serious scandals: Watergate and Cambodia for Nixon, and Iran Contra for Reagan. Republicans were desperate to take down a Democrat in the same way that Nixon had been politically destroyed. It was one of the most naked displays of partisan politics ever seen in history, and the American public were revolted by it. Republicans paid a horrific price at the mid-terms.

No one has ever "flipped" on the Clintons. No evidence of bribery or corruption has ever been found. The Clintons have been open and public with their tax returns, and their income, as well as it's sources. Their Foundation is one of the most innovative and successful private foundations ever created. And because of their success and popularity, Republicans have demonized and vilified their every move. The continuing legal pursuit of the Clintons by obsessed right wingers is the very essence of a "witch hunt".
 
Here's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.


Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....


Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!
Had Barr said the promm
Here's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.


Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....


Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!
And you conclude Trump definitely had nothing to do with Russian hacking?


The burden is not on me to prove Trump is innocent. The burden is on the accusers to prove his guilt. After $$millions and 2 plus years, you have come up with ZILCH. The evidence that has been unearthed shows that the Obama Admin SPIED on the opposition party's presidential candidate in 2016. You prog loons started this nightmare, and like all liars, you will be caught in your own trap.

There has been NO EVIDENCE shown that Obama spied Donald Trump, and a whole lot of evidence that he didn't.

There is also reasonable and just cause to note that in all cases, Trump officials were contacting people the American security networks were surveilling: Russian spies, operatives and officials. With over direct 100 personal and direct contacts between people connected with the Trump Campaign, the FBI, CIA and NSA would have been negligent and derelict in the performance of their sworn duty to protect the nation NOT to question the nature of these contacts.

But thanks for repeating today's FOX News lies, demonstrating your inability to look at facts, information which is in evidence, and realizing that Trump is still trying to spin the idea that the Mueller Report totally exonerates him, when in point of fact, it does nothing of the kind, as evidenced by William Barr's own letter to Congress.
 
Barr clearly is all set to attack the crooked deep state ?


The main news with this is it looks like Barr knows mueller is guilty of high treason

Mueller sent this to the southern district of New York that protects democrats

And looks like Barr grabbed this and bringing the indictment from the DC district

////////////

Attorneys for Greg Craig told reporters that they expect their client, the White House counsel during the Obama administration, to be indicted soon.


In a statement to several news outlets, attorneys William W. Taylor III and William Murphy said the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington will proffer charges related to Mr. Craig’s work with Ukrainian politicians and disgraced Trump-campaign figure Paul Manafort at the behest of the Justice Department’s national security division.

//////

Not from
Mueller but from the new DOJ !!

Mueller must now know he is in big trouble
 
That if he says “complete exoneration” often enough people will lose interest

You mean like how Hillary thought if she said WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE? often enough, we'd lose interest in the murders behind the Benghazi coverup?

Or do you mean like how when Obama thought that if he just said CORRUPTION AT THE IRS? NOT EVEN A SMIDGEN OF CORRUPTION while the IRS investigation into how they suppressed Romney voters in 2012 was still going on that we'd forget about Lois Lerner and how they stole an election?

No one give a flying crap about Trump's taxes except for a tiny cadre of rabid democrats still out to try to hang something around his neck. If there is anything wrong with Trump's taxes, we have the IRS to take care of that.

There was no Benghazi "coverup" as determined by 7 Republican Investigations - no coverups, no lies, just a witch hunt to discredit Clinton in the eyes of American voters. That's your first lie.

How could the IRS possible suppress voters? They didn't strike Republican names from voter rolls, block voter registration applications, or change ID requirements.That one of the dumbest things you've ever posted which is saying a LOT.

As a Russian troll, perhaps you might not be aware but non-profit corporations CANNOT BE POLITICAL in nature. If your non-profit's goals are to promote Republican causes, your application for non-profit status will be declined. So yes, it is necessary for the IRS to ask more questions from those Tea Party non-profits which flooded the IRS with requests for non-profit status. Lois Lerner is a registered Republican. That's you second lie.

Barrack Obama won the 2012 election in a landslide. One of the largest electoral college victories in history. That's your third lie.

I know you Russians are in the habit of lying over and over again and changing history. That's pretty much the Joseph Stalin playbook that Donald Trump is currently using, but the vast majority have watched this dangerously incompetent idot stumble through the first two years of his Presidency like a bull in a china shop, destroying every aspect of the institutions which make America rich and powerful, sellling access and policy through his golf clubs.

And here's the thing, going into 2020. Competent and experienced candidates will not run down ticket to be part of Donald Trump's Congress or Senate. Everything Donald Trump touches dies, and right now, he's killing the Republican Party.

When you have a toxic and corrupt President like Donald Trump, who doesn't reflect sound American values, only corrupt and venal people will want to be part of his government. That, in part, is why Republicans lost the House. People will not vote for Trump's agenda of hate and cruelty. Americans want better people working on their behalf, and Trump has only worked to enrich himself and his billionaire buddies, and to punish his enemies. He has done nothing for the working Americans he promised to help.
only corrupt and venal people will want to be part of his government.}}}
how very true and only stupid people with low IQ's would believe this moron in our WH and support him One day when I have the time I'll make a list of those supporters here
 
It's almost funny how these morons latched onto the spying bullshit like it was the life preserver from a sinking ship, but are conveniently deaf when Barr walked it back once confronted with the fact it was legal surveillance.
 
Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.


www.theguardian.com/…

Perhaps no more than Holder and Lynch were BO's stooges.
 
A
Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.


www.theguardian.com/…
And this is what full blown Trump derangement syndrome looks like. You've sure got it bad.
I'm just waiting for the day when Trump pulls a Jim Jones & tells assholes like you to start sipping.

I'll just light a cigar, sit back & laugh.
 
A
Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.


www.theguardian.com/…
And this is what full blown Trump derangement syndrome looks like. You've sure got it bad.
I'm just waiting for the day when Trump pulls a Jim Jones & tells assholes like you to start sipping.

I'll just light a cigar, sit back & laugh.

Is that going to be after he replaces RBG and Sotomayor?
 
A
Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.

Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.

The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.

The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.


www.theguardian.com/…
And this is what full blown Trump derangement syndrome looks like. You've sure got it bad.
I'm just waiting for the day when Trump pulls a Jim Jones & tells assholes like you to start sipping.

I'll just light a cigar, sit back & laugh.
Take that lit cigar and stick it up your dumb republican ass
 
Perhaps no more than Holder and Lynch were BO's stooges.


Was Obama ALSO being investigated by almost everyone in law enforcement ???

Sip that kool-aid....and stick to the thread's topic....
 
Now taking huge pay-outs for the Clinton Foundation at the same time CRITICAL policy decisions need to made --- or having your AIDES give Clinton foreign donors SPECIAL ACCESS and FAVORS could be a crime.. But you're not interested a wit in that --- are you moron???

Atta boy, Trump cult member and ass licker......"defend" your clown by accusing the Clintons of also being corrupt....without a fucking thought that your are actually ADMITTING that your charlatan is ALSO crooked.

I could CARE LESS about his business practices. And you don't understand how to run an intl real estate development gigue either. I CARE --- that he's earnest in tackling problems and finding solutions that Congress is no longer capable of or interested in..

Now the Clinton's I care about.. Because their little personal empire resembles a shadow State and Commerce Dept and influence peddling when one of them IS the Sec State does bother me.. Couple with getting their cronies to SELL stuff to struggling countries that DONT NEED their shit..
 
You are truly, and without a doubt, around the proverbial bend. A hell of a lot of Cops are driving the Dodge Charger. Dodge, a storied American Brand, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fiat, an Italian Company.

Does this mean that Italy is being bribed by the various agencies, State, Local, County, and Federal, who buy Dodge cars after a process to bid and select cars that suit the needs of the cops?

I swear the longer this goes on, the more insane you Hate Trump folks get. In one breath, the left swears that Trump is ruining our International Image. In the very next breath, you swear that Trump is a puppet of International Influence because his company does business internationally. I wish you frothing at the mouth lunatics would pick a story for just one damned day so we can figure out what the hell you are talking about. Is international business and internationalism bad, and Trump is part of some wild eyed one world Government insanity? Or is Nationalism bad, and Trump is a Nazi for threatening to close the border with Mexico.

Just make up your fucking minds for ten damned minutes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top