bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,251
- 9,690
Had Barr said the prommHere's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.
Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....
Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!
And you conclude Trump definitely had nothing to do with Russian hacking?Here's the difference bub: for Whitewater and Benghazi, the press protected the Clintons despite actual evidence. For Trump, the press is making up shit, and after over two years of being spied on and investigated, he's clean.
Based on the above bullshit.......Best thing for you is to have a tall glass of orange kool-aid and go back to bed.....
Spin spin spin little moonbat, spin!
The burden is not on me to prove Trump is innocent. The burden is on the accusers to prove his guilt. After $$millions and 2 plus years, you have come up with ZILCH. The evidence that has been unearthed shows that the Obama Admin SPIED on the opposition party's presidential candidate in 2016. You prog loons started this nightmare, and like all liars, you will be caught in your own trap.
Don't move the gaol posts, missy(-: Barr said there was spying despite not showing the probable cause was fudged.