Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .
Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO
I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.
She made no such decision, dope.
Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .
Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO
I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.
Hillary made no decisions about the Uranium One deal. She attended no meetings and had no participation or input in the discussions. The State Department technical team were the participants in those meetings.
Time to add another definition to the word "gullible" in the dictionary.
Break it down for us. Show us how it went down.
Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO
I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.
Hillary made no decisions about the Uranium One deal. She attended no meetings and had no participation or input in the discussions. The State Department technical team were the participants in those meetings.
Time to add another definition to the word "gullible" in the dictionary.
Break it down for us. Show us how it went down.
Read it for yourself. Of particular note:
June 2010: Bill Clinton gives a speech in Moscow for a $500,000 fee, paid for by Renaissance Capital, “a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin,” and whose analysts “talked up Uranium One’s stock,” saying in a July 2010 report “that it was ‘the best play’ in the uranium markets.” (NYT 4/23/15)
October 2010: The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) approves the partial sale of Uranium One to Rosatom, which gives the Russians (and President Vladimir Putin) a 51 percent controlling stake in Uranium One. With this deal, Rosatom controls 20% of U.S. uranium production. Members of CFIUS included, among others, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, and Attorney General Eric Holder. (*Bloomberg 10/18/2017 and NYT 4/23/15)
Timeline: Uranium Exec. Gave $31.3 Million to Clinton Foundation, Russian Bank Paid $500K to Bill Clinton
You are also gullible, naive, and not particularly bright.
Still wondering if Barr is a Trump STOOGE???
No matter spelling. Or typing skills dont matter much its the content that makes you look like a moron honey and thats all youLol your a moron im tri racial
Well, that makes you a tri-racial idiot,,,,,,,Laern the difference between "you're" and "your" and you'll come off a tiny bit less STUPID....LMAO
Anyway, emoluments are "gifts" or "bribes", while purchasing services is not. .
Perfect response from Trump CULT member..........What a surprise......LMAO
I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.
You were deeply invested in that Russia collusion thing, huh?
So, now the president (and all federal officials) can now accept bribes from foreign governments, so long as its through their private corporations?Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS sear with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.
Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.
The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.
The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.
www.theguardian.com/…
Paying market rate for a service is not a bribe, get back to me when they start paying multiples of the market rate.
.
Still wondering if Barr is a Trump STOOGE???
Nope. Not at all. Mueller report is old news, Barr is going to release the complete report with necessary redactions as per Mueller in about a week meantime I've moved on to relevant bigger news in the hot-pressing matters column, like whether Trump sprays his orange tan on or simply rubs it in. Democrats at Eleven.
So, now the president (and all federal officials) can now accept bribes from foreign governments, so long as its through their private corporations?Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS sear with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.
Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.
The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.
The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.
www.theguardian.com/…
Paying market rate for a service is not a bribe, get back to me when they start paying multiples of the market rate.
.
Well, membership fees at Mar a Lago went from 100,000 before Trump was elected to 200,000 after he became president. Even FOX news ran an article about it.
Trump's Mar-a-Lago doubles initiation fee to $200K
Donald Trump’s luxury resort in Florida is making the most of his leap into the White House by doubling its initiation fee to $200,000, it was reported Wednesday.
The price hike at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach took effect on Jan. 1, less than two months after Trump’s defeat of Hillary Clinton, according to CNBC.
A Reuters report said the increase occurred in two phases — from $100,000 to $150,000 in June, and then to $200,000 this month.
The timing raised red flags for a government watchdog.
“It sure looks like he’s using the presidency to line his pockets,” said Jordan Libowitz of the Center for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, DC.
So how many foreign governments are paying these increased fees, are they paying more than Americans? Also, how do you know these increases weren't planned long before he was elected?
.
Trump's DC hotel raised room rates after inauguration: report | TheHill
You've got T-mobile CEO increasing spending at Trump hotels.So, now the president (and all federal officials) can now accept bribes from foreign governments, so long as its through their private corporations?Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS sear with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.
Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.
The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.
The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.
www.theguardian.com/…
Paying market rate for a service is not a bribe, get back to me when they start paying multiples of the market rate.
.
I bet you don't see anything wrong with Bubba Clinton taking $500K from the Russians for a "speech" in 2010 while hiLIARy was making decisions about the Uranium One deal.
Above, a perfect example why fuckheads strongly believe that any defense of Trump MUST include an attack of Hillary, and that maybe TWO wrongs are just fine.......LOL
A perfect example of the bogus moral equivalency performed by the Progs when they equate perfectly legal business transactions (Trump) with bribes (Clintons).
No President has ever owned a business while President. His only interest is supposed to be his work for and on behalf of the people.
George Washington had a working farm and a brewery, so try again.
.
Yeah?
Were Saudi lobbyists flying in to drop a ton of cash by booking 500 nignts at his luxury hotel?
You've got T-mobile CEO increasing spending at Trump hotels.
Saudi lobbyist paying for 500 nights.
Even Trump's inaugural committee.
Hotel emoluments case he wants thrown out, because Trump cant prove innocence.
No. And it's a pity. Spying is now a judicially authorzed search, regardless of whether there was probable cause.Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.
Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.
The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.
The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.
www.theguardian.com/…
No. And it's a pity. Spying is now a judicially authorzed search, regardless of whether there was probable cause.Perhaps hoping that Trump can fill a SCOTUS seat with his fat ass, Barr is doing ALL of Trump's bidding perhaps stalling judicial oversight of his pro-Trump decisions since Barr is begging for a subpoena to force his biased hands.
Here's another cure pro-Trump decision by the DOJ screwing over any attempts by saner Americans who still believed that the Emolument Clause had some validity.
The Department of Justice has adopted a narrow interpretation of a law meant to bar foreign interests from corrupting federal officials, giving Saudi Arabia, China and other countries leeway to curry favor with Donald Trump via deals with his hotels, condos, trademarks and golf courses, legal and national security experts say.
The justice department stance now closely parallels arguments made in a January 2017 position paper by Trump Organization lawyer Sheri Dillon and several of her law partners. On 11 January 2017, just days before he was sworn in, Dillon said Trump isn’t accepting any payments in his “official capacity” as president, as the income is only related to his private business. “Paying for a hotel room is not a gift or a present, and it has nothing to do with an office,” Dillon said.
www.theguardian.com/…
I heard on the radio today that James Baker, DOJ counsel, testified that a special counsel was being discussed BEFORE Comey was fired. So much for the lie that Comey's firing is what caused it.
.
Its ground zero for the swamp.You've got T-mobile CEO increasing spending at Trump hotels.
Saudi lobbyist paying for 500 nights.
Even Trump's inaugural committee.
Hotel emoluments case he wants thrown out, because Trump cant prove innocence.
Trumpo.....being a smart con-man, RAISED the rates of his D.C. hotel just after his inauguration....
Amazing, in the midst of "thinking" what he was doing to help our country, Trump remembered to raise those hotel rates...........LMAO