Frankenstein
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2022
- 7,672
- 5,032
- 1,938
Ya got nothing, because of course I am right!trollboi, go away
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya got nothing, because of course I am right!trollboi, go away
Trump kept saying Cohen got a “monthly retainer."
We are seeing evidence presented that that is a lie.
President Donald Trump and one of his new attorneys admit he reimbursed his longtime fixer for a payment made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, a striking reversal from what the president said just a few weeks ago. But team Trump’s attempts to clear up the matter is full of contradictions.
The proof of the purpose is 2 fold. one was witnesses testifying that Trump tried to stall paying her until after the election to then not pay her at all. The other is the timing of the payment which was about 2 weeks before an election to cover up an affair alleged to have occurred a decade earlier.
Facts underlying the crime billie.Tell me you don't understand without telling me you don't understand.
That's a total farce. He wrote the checks himself to the lawyer as legal fees. Even if you can manufacture a claim of a false business expense, the statute of limitations expired years ago. The convoluted claim that it somehow constitutes a felony because it violated campaign finance law is simply laughable, as many liberal legal experts have stated. The state prosecutor cannot enforce federal campaign law violations as they were already investigated by the DOJ and FEC, declining to prosecute.Prosecutors are making the case, that the payoff were done, concealed in business transactions, sheltered on corporate accounts as business legal expenses, instead of personal expenses, and that they were made to hide his indiscretions from the voters, to affect the campaign and presidential election of 2016. In doing so, it represented a large non-campaign finance violation, and an organized conspiracy. Like so many payoffs, it is not the payoff or the act that prompted, but the conspiracy cover up, that is the felony. It will be up to the Jury to decide, if they make their case. Tell you what, though, I will go with the Jury, and if they say he is innocent, I will congratulate him on here.
Just because you are ignorant does not mean you ar e not lying. His family lives in Florida, and his sons have attended the trial also. Who else did you have in mind?Nah, I think I will stay and keep telling it how it is, no matter what rightwing trump trolls crawl out of their holes. You see, trump is getting what trump calls for, by word, deed and action. If it were a democrat that did the same actions, you would be clamoring for action, wondering what took so long. So, here we are, another day in court and more of the true trump character coming to the surface, along with the background on how his miscalculations and desire to be above the law (along with his usual desires) brings him to another day in court, not even supported by any wife or family, as they all know he fucked her, authorized the payoff, attempted to launder the money through corporate accounts as a business expense, was aware of every facet of the attempted coverup, and now facing what normal people would face if they committed the same and tried to blame it on his lawyer, who served time for his conspiracy to cover up Don's peter track to hide his cheating on his marriage from the voters. The cover up hush money was effective in the time frame it was needed, to secure the religious vote, but it all came out later, anyway.
Trump has changed his story so many times.what evidence is that?
you're confusedThat's a total farce. He wrote the checks himself to the lawyer as legal fees. Even if you can manufacture a claim of a false business expense, the statute of limitations expired years ago. The convoluted claim that it somehow constitutes a felony because it violated campaign finance law is simply laughable, as many liberal legal experts have stated. The state prosecutor cannot enforce federal campaign law violations as they were already investigated by the DOJ and FEC, declining to prosecute.
There was no fucking coverup! You need to get your head out of your ass, or Biden's dick out of your mouth and you might make some sense.
huh? you claimed "We are seeing evidence presented that that is a lie."Trump has changed his story so many times.
The funny thing about that case is that there was absolutely no evidence that the so-called assault ever took place. You and the jurors all missed that part, didn't you?Donald Deny Deny Deny Trump's word is worthless and everybody knows it. He denied sticking a finger in E Jean Carroll against her will, but the jury didn't buy it.
what ever the truth is...Daniels used vulgar accusations & comments with out evidence.No, we are not.
Trump has changed his story so many times.
None of that was illegal depending on your legal opinion and the statute of limitations has long since expired, so what have you got? NDAs are always secret. That is simply what they are to prevent disclosing harmful information. I signed an NDA with the military and in private business on numerous occasions. Perfectly legal.Prosecutors are making the case, that the payoff were done, concealed in business transactions, sheltered on corporate accounts as business legal expenses, instead of personal expenses, and that they were made to hide his indiscretions from the voters, to affect the campaign and presidential election of 2016. In doing so, it represented a large non-campaign finance violation, and an organized conspiracy. Like so many payoffs, it is not the payoff or the act that prompted, but the conspiracy cover up, that is the felony. It will be up to the Jury to decide, if they make their case. Tell you what, though, I will go with the Jury, and if they say he is innocent, I will congratulate him on here.
She has two signed statements that she never had sex with Trump. Was she lying then or is she lying now? She is a liar either way!What has she lied about?
What Kind of relationship does she have with her husband?I sure hope he said "SKANK"!![]()
Geezus.... It looks like all of Trump's court cases are going to fall through. Now I hear ENGO-MORON did some improper communication about the case prior to his judgment.She has two signed statements that she never had sex with Trump. Was she lying then or is she lying now? She is a liar either way!
Geezus.... It looks like all of Trump's court cases are going to fall through. Now I hear ENGO-MORON did some improper communication about the case prior to his judgment.
You cannot have an illegal campaign contribution to your own campaign with your own money! That's why the DOJ and FEC said there was nothing to charge him with!How many times do you need me to repeat the same answer to the same question?
An illegal campaign contribution.