Stormy Daniels Changes Her Story AGAIN?

[Billiejeens]

The FEC found no violations. Using the John Edwards case as precedent. Why won't this crooked judge allow the man at the FEC who was in charge of that investigation to testify about that?

Same reason that there was no dissenting opinion during the JAN 6th infomercials?

 

[otto105]

You're looking at a minor offense That's trying to grow into a felony and it never will.
Add to that the fact that Ms Daniels apparently can't make up her mind as to whether or not deed was actually done and you have death on appeal.

Hilarious

Does it not bother you that Cheeto cult leader has no moral compass?

While today our President Biden cleaned up the fuckups Foxconned mess with in WI.

 

[otto105]

For an NDA?....pretty obvious

She looked like hie daughter…

He was in!

 

[justoffal]

She looked like hie daughter…

He was in!

So Trump is a scumbag so what? Doesn't make him a felon.

 

[Road Runner]

So Trump is a scumbag so what? Doesn't make him a felon.

Also doesn't make him a bad president.

 

[otto105]

So Trump is a scumbag so what? Doesn't make him a felon.

Falsified documents show different.

If not showing Hunter Biden penis pictures before the 2020 election was illegal (see Fox) and fraudulent then what is hiding pornstar sex?

 

[White 6]

Yeah...why couldn't Trump be more like a Democrat...right, White! You know...like John F. Kennedy! Now there was a man who knew how to keep it in his pants! Or JFK's biggest fan? Slick Willie Clinton? Another man of high moral character who never strayed? Your hypocrisy is palpable!

He should be more like a decent human being, not live down to others before him, Dem or Rep. I take it, this mean nothing to you. If you had a female child, to marry a man that did not honor their marriage, your attitude would be one of acceptance as others have done it before, so as long as he paid the bills, he would be pretty much a good person in your estimation, whether daughter liked it or not, after all, not much to importance whether somebody is a man of their word, or even a promise before God. Couple that, to the times Trump has had to pay off on many fraud judgements, involving his college, or charities where he misused funds for personal profit, so no longer able to set up or operate charities in some states, having proved he cannot be trusted. I don't even remember the Dems you mentioned caught up in that kind of thing. How about the corporation he headed being charged with felonies and having to pay huge fines. All in all, his conduct over the years paints him as a man that cannot be trusted, except to look out for himself, a man of very poor character.

You may be devoted to party. That is your mistake, and one I have never made. Your us vs them mentality is pretty strong, so I have to assume you to be blinded to the shortcomings of your candidate. I am not.

 

[justoffal]

Falsified documents show different.

If not showing Hunter Biden penis pictures before the 2020 election was illegal (see Fox) and fraudulent then what is hiding pornstar sex?

It has nothing to do with hiding the sex It has to do with potentially falsified documents and misuse of campaign funds.

You're looking at some minor fines. No matter how they try to stretch it they're not going to get what they want out of this unless all they really want to do is chew up his campaigning time which they have succeeded in doing.

I don't understand why his wife is still with him. Actually maybe she really isn't.

 

[otto105]

And has nothing to do with hiding the sex It has to do with potentially falsified documents and misuse of campaign funds.
You're looking at some minor fines. No matter how they try to stretch it they're not going to get what they want out of this unless all they really want to do is chew up his campaigning time which they have succeeded in doing.

It’s not a trial because of a small misdemeanor, but rather a felony.


Also your guy rawdogged a pornstar just after his son was born.

Any issues with that?

 

[justoffal]

It’s not a trial because of a small misdemeanor, but rather a felony.


Also your guy rawdogged a pornstar just after his son was born.

Any issues with that?

I have issues with it just like I have issues with Biden grabbing a 9-year-old's breast in public. Not something I would do ...however I really don't give a shit.

There's no felony here and the federal elections commission is not going to back up Bragg on this one unless they want to have a thousand cases reopened over the past decade.

 

[White 6]

That's a total farce. He wrote the checks himself to the lawyer as legal fees. Even if you can manufacture a claim of a false business expense, the statute of limitations expired years ago. The convoluted claim that it somehow constitutes a felony because it violated campaign finance law is simply laughable, as many liberal legal experts have stated. The state prosecutor cannot enforce federal campaign law violations as they were already investigated by the DOJ and FEC, declining to prosecute.

There was no fucking coverup! You need to get your head out of your ass, or Biden's dick out of your mouth and you might make some sense.

So, I take it, you no longer support courts, trials and juries. How about the constitution. You took an oath to that, at one time. Do you still support it, or figure it is time for a change? You might get it.

 

[White 6]

Just because you are ignorant does not mean you ar e not lying. His family lives in Florida, and his sons have attended the trial also. Who else did you have in mind?

Making a payoff is not illegal, so why would he hide it? No coverup existed. Also, his lawyer was convicted of other crimes, and nothing to do with Stormy Daniels payoff, which he did on his own to keep her quiet. That is perfectly legal so he could not be convicted for that. You can just color yourself wrong on so many levels. Why do you lie if you know the truth?

Oh, of course. Can't afford the travel from Florida for something so inconsequential and unimportant.

 

[Man With A Plan]

He should be more like a decent human being, not live down to others before him, Dem or Rep. I take it, this mean nothing to you. If you had a female child, to marry a man that did not honor their marriage, your attitude would be one of acceptance as others have done it before, so as long as he paid the bills, he would be pretty much a good person in your estimation, whether daughter liked it or not, after all, not much to importance whether somebody is a man of their word, or even a promise before God. Couple that, to the times Trump has had to pay off on many fraud judgements, involving his college, or charities where he misused funds for personal profit, so no longer able to set up or operate charities in some states, having proved he cannot be trusted. I don't even remember the Dems you mentioned caught up in that kind of thing. How about the corporation he headed being charged with felonies and having to pay huge fines. All in all, his conduct over the years paints him as a man that cannot be trusted, except to look out for himself, a man of very poor character.

You may be devoted to party. That is your mistake, and one I have never made. Your us vs them mentality is pretty strong, so I have to assume you to be blinded to the shortcomings of your candidate. I am not.

I thought Jimmy Carter was a wonderful human being...someone to be admired. I did not find him to be a good President.
You don't remember John F. Kennedy or Bill Clinton? Seriously? LOL

 

[White 6]

The funny thing about that case is that there was absolutely no evidence that the so-called assault ever took place. You and the jurors all missed that part, didn't you?

I was not on the jury, nor the judge. I will go with what the jury and judge ruled. Not everybody has to come before me. I still believe in the courts, whether you do or not.

 

[Man With A Plan]

So, I take it, you no longer support courts, trials and juries. How the constitution. You took an oath to that, at one time. Do you still support it, or figure it is time for a change? You might get it.

Looking at what Democrats are doing with their lawfare campaign against Trump and pointing out how wrong it is doesn't mean you don't support "courts, trials and juries", White! That's an absurd argument. If you believe in our system of justice then you should speak up when it's being abused for political reasons by the people in power NO MATTER WHO THEY ARE! I'm sorry but you're on the wrong side of this issue.

 

[otto105]

I have issues with it just like I have issues with Biden grabbing a 9-year-old's breast in public. Not something I would do ...however I really don't give a shit.

There's no felony here and the federal elections commission is not going to back up Bragg on this one unless they want to have a thousand cases reopened over the past decade.

Excuses and deflection.

The fact the trial stands and will come to verdict based on evidence is scary to you.

It should not be. If your guy is innocent then then he will have shown the evidence.

That’s not your issue. You like all of maga want to control justice and law,

 

[White 6]

I will overlook those flaws in consideration of 9% inflation vs. 1.4%
Has not and will not change my vote.

View attachment 944305

Gee, I missed the 9% inflation number. Most say 7.5 then dropped to 3.5, but whatever. Too bad you didn't learn anything from the 70s and 80s of consistent 6.5 to 12.5% inflation and employment being scarce, unlike today's vibrant economy.

 

[IM2]

When Bill Clinton was sexing an intern we ddn't see all the attempts to justify from the right. And Democrats did not cut Clinton any slack. Clinton lost his ability to practice law over his behavior. So at minimum, Trump should not be able to run for publlic office.

 

[Man With A Plan]

I was not on the jury, nor the judge. I will go with what the jury and judge ruled. Not everybody has to come before me. I still believe in the courts, whether you do or not.

Would you have "gone with" what juries and judges ruled in the deep South during the Civil Rights fight for equal justice? Or would you have seen that the juries were biased and the judges corrupt and spoken out against what was taking place? This is akin to what's happening in New York. You've got a biased jury pool and activist judges that aren't going to arrive at a just decision. That's obvious from the Tish James verdict of almost a half a billion dollars in a case where there were no victims and there was no fraud!

 

[IM2]

Looking at what Democrats are doing with their lawfare campaign against Trump and pointing out how wrong it is doesn't mean you don't support "courts, trials and juries", White! That's an absurd argument. If you believe in our system of justice then you should speak up when it's being abused for political reasons by the people in power NO MATTER WHO THEY ARE! I'm sorry but you're on the wrong side of this issue.

There is no lawfare campaign against Trump. Trump is simply a corrupt man.