Studies Say This About Progressives....

[NYcarbineer]

6. Academia hides research results that support conservative and traditional doctrines. They can do this, because Liberals/Progressives are in charge.

Why is academia so infused.....infected.....with Liberals?


"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better.


They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear."

“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler



Get it? Liberals 'blacklist ' conservatives, traditionalists, etc., from making a living in academia......just as communists did in Hollywood well before the anti-communist blacklist that is claimed by Liberals; communist Dalton Trumbo bragged about doing so.

There are more liberals in education because conservatives don't give a shit about educating others as a career.

 

[OnePercenter]

6. Academia hides research results that support conservative and traditional doctrines. They can do this, because Liberals/Progressives are in charge.

Why is academia so infused.....infected.....with Liberals?


"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better.


They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear."

“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler



Get it? Liberals 'blacklist ' conservatives, traditionalists, etc., from making a living in academia......just as communists did in Hollywood well before the anti-communist blacklist that is claimed by Liberals; communist Dalton Trumbo bragged about doing so.

There are more liberals in education because conservatives don't give a shit about educating others as a career.

They don't want to pay for education that others paid for them.

 

[TNHarley]

Good gawd. You people are more hackish than the OP

 

[PoliticalChic]

Studies of the facts show that conservation is dying a slow, hideous death.

completely irrelevant

Conservatives aren't completely irrelevant yet, but they're getting there.

Actual conservatives are rich, middle class conservatives are cheap, ignorant, hypocritical goons that nobody likes.

Clearly a conclusion based on the same sort of interviewing techniques used in kindergarten, leading to the 'Nobody likes you' sort of news flash.


Hurry back when you finally graduate from junior high.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Academia hides research results that support conservative and traditional doctrines. They can do this, because Liberals/Progressives are in charge.

Why is academia so infused.....infected.....with Liberals?


"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better.


They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear."

“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler



Get it? Liberals 'blacklist ' conservatives, traditionalists, etc., from making a living in academia......just as communists did in Hollywood well before the anti-communist blacklist that is claimed by Liberals; communist Dalton Trumbo bragged about doing so.

There are more liberals in education because conservatives don't give a shit about educating others as a career.

They don't want to pay for education that others paid for them.

Spoken like a true government school grad.

 

[NYcarbineer]

6. Academia hides research results that support conservative and traditional doctrines. They can do this, because Liberals/Progressives are in charge.

Why is academia so infused.....infected.....with Liberals?


"Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better.


They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear."

“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler



Get it? Liberals 'blacklist ' conservatives, traditionalists, etc., from making a living in academia......just as communists did in Hollywood well before the anti-communist blacklist that is claimed by Liberals; communist Dalton Trumbo bragged about doing so.

There are more liberals in education because conservatives don't give a shit about educating others as a career.

They don't want to pay for education that others paid for them.

The OP doesn't even have a job and lives, apparently comfortably, off the labors of others.

Interesting in light of the content of her posts which so often attack people without jobs.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberal academics, 'social scients,' are actually tin pot tyrants with a fear of being confronted.
Hence....they do everything they can never to have to see or hear the other side.



7. "Unfortunately, when asked to reform by adding diverse voices, social scientists opt for any strategy other than inclusiveness, almost as if they were old-fashioned segregationists. ....so many of their beliefs conflict not so much with tradition as with reality.

.... much new evidence has come to light since the Regnerus controversy that shows that family structure matters:

Princeton University and the left-of-center Brookings Institution released a study that reported "most scholars now agree that children raised by two biological parents in a stable marriage do better than children in other family forms across a wide range of outcomes."


Another study … found that states with more married parents do better on a broad range of economic indicators, including upward mobility for poor children and lower rates of child poverty.

On most economic indicators, the Washington Post summarized, "the share of parents who are married in a state is a better predictor of that state's economic health than the racial composition and educational attainment of the state's residents." MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences



"....most scholars now agree that children raised by two biological parents in a stable marriage do better than children in other family forms..."

"...married parents do better..."




Yet Liberals have made certain that the occupant of the White House is none other than the titular head of the LBGT Movement.


Liberals and Progressives....destroyers of civilization.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If there were anything untrue in the OP, you would have been able to post it.

That which is asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence.

Was it one of the Hitchens who said that?

Turns out I provided plenty of 'evidence,' huh?

Bet you feel like a fool.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Notice how NOTHING the OP says after her initial rant offers anything to support her initial rant?

That's how losers of debates debate.

 

[Corky]

always appreciate it when the mentally disturbed reveal themselves without the necessity of a questionnaire.

I just look for a TRUMP bumper sticker.

 

[AntonToo]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’

Well you certainly are not expecting to hear such words from conservatives, they are mostly content to just make shit up.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Studies of the facts show that conservation is dying a slow, hideous death.

Only in your Fascist dreams.

Progressive governments like in Greece, Cuba and Venezuela are already Walking Dead

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

always appreciate it when the mentally disturbed reveal themselves without the necessity of a questionnaire.

I just look for a TRUMP bumper sticker.

I appreciate that you haven't denied the conclusion reached about your mental disability.

It is so stipulated.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’

Well you certainly are not expecting to hear such words from conservatives, they are mostly content to just make shit up.

And yet, my authorship of the thread, and your insipid post, prove quite the opposite,don't they.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Studies of the facts show that conservation is dying a slow, hideous death.

Only in your Fascist dreams.

Progressive governments like in Greece, Cuba and Venezuela are already Walking Dead

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

Oooo....look....another Liberal simpleton ( is that redundant?) reduced to an 'is not, isssss noootttttt!!!' post.

 

[Norman]

You don't need a study to show that progressives are simply thieves who choose to speak of themselves very highly.

 

[AntonToo]

And yet, my authorship of the thread, and your insipid post, prove quite the opposite,don't they.

No dumbass, they don't.

 

[koshergrl]

When Liberals/Progressives hear the words ‘ studies show,’ or ‘experts say,’ they cease to ‘question authority.’ Hence the appellation…'Lock-Step Liberals'

But there is a dark side....a darker side...that leads from that reputation.....it bodes the end of Western Civilization.



1. " All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences" MercatorNet: All sides agree: progressive politics is strangling social sciences
Real advances are stymied by the strangle hold that Progressives have on academia.


2." If you thought that the progressive bias in social sciences was considered a problem only by tradition-minded folk, you might be surprised to hear the views of celebrity skeptic, Michael Shermer in Scientific American earlier this year:

A 2015 study by psychologist José Duarte, then at Arizona State University, and his colleagues in Behavioral and Brain Sciences, entitled “Political Diversity Will Improve Social Psychological Science,” found that 58 to 66 percent of social scientists are liberal and only 5 to 8 percent conservative and that there are eight Democrats for every Republican.
How does this political asymmetry corrupt social science? It begins with what subjects are studied and the descriptive language employed.

Duarte et al. find similar distortive language across the social sciences, where, for instance, certain words are used to suggest pernicious motives when confronting contradictory evidence—“deny,” “legitimize,” “rationalize,” “justify,” “defend,” “trivialize”—with conservatives as examples, as if liberals are always objective and rational." Ibid.




3. If our Liberal/Progressive/Democrat voters where bright enough, they would have caught on to the scam long go....
...as conservative/traditional observers have.

4. But hold on! Some Liberals not only caught on....but have the honesty to declaim it!
" As Jesse Singal puts it at New York magazine, discussing a liberal critique, Alice Dreger’s Galileo’s Middle Finger,
If activists—any activists, regardless of their political orientation or the rightness of their cause—get to decide by fiat what is and isn’t an acceptable interpretation of the world, then science is pointless, and we should just throw the whole damn thing out." Ibid.




Just as I said.....Liberals/Progressives presage the end of our civilization.

So true. I was just pointing this out to that idiot Taz.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You don't need to study to show that progressives are simply thieves who choose to speak of themselves very highly.

But.....rubbing it in never hurts.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And yet, my authorship of the thread, and your insipid post, prove quite the opposite,don't they.

No dumbass, they don't.

1. How many of the words in my post did you have to look up?

2. Why are you unable to posit a post of any substance?
Is it because you are a Liberal, or because you are a government school grad, or simply because you're obtuse (better look that up, too)?


Do you appreciate the vocabulary lessons I provide?